Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2501933 Journalism | OB | 3 | 1 |
-Distinguish facts from opinion
-Good development in interpretative journalistic genres
- Linguistic competence
The objectives for the students are:
- To know about the characteristics of the argumentative journalistic genres
- Be capable to analyze them
- Control the style and the expressive resources of argumentative pieces
1. Discoursive genres
2. Genology in journalism
3. Rethoric and argumentation
4. Cultural critique
The course has on line theory and practice sessions. In the magistral classes it will be developed and debated the basic argumentative skills, with a focus in the argumentative genres.
All the lab practices are presential and evaluable.
The proposed teaching methodology and evaluation activities may undergo some modifications depending on the health authorities' attendance restrictions.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lab | 22.5 | 0.9 | 6, 10 |
Salon sessions | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tuorial activities | 9.5 | 0.38 | 3, 6, 9 |
Tutorial meetings | 9.5 | 0.38 | 8, 1, 4, 3, 6, 7, 9 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Journalistic pieces design | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 5, 10 |
Reading and studying | 26.5 | 1.06 | 1, 2 |
The calendar will be available on the first day of class. Students will find all information on the Virtual Campus: the description of the activities, teaching materials, and any necessary information for the proper follow-up of the subject. In case of a change of teaching modality for health reasons, teachers will make readjustments in the schedule and methodologiesThe evaluation system is continued and progressive. Are evaluated the practices (journalistic pieces based on argumenation) with a 70% of the weight in the scores, and the theoretical sessions, with a 30% of the weight in the final scores.
The journalistic pieces are argumentation articles and analysis.
The theoretical exams are a test and a journalistic comment, this one excluded of reavaluation.
All the journalistic pieces and the test can be recovered (reavaluated) only if the student coursed a 2/3 of the activities.
The test has to be reavaluated if the score is major of 3 and minor of 5.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final test and comment | 30% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 5, 6 |
Journalistic pieces | 70% | 38 | 1.52 | 8, 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, 7, 9, 10 |
Aristòtil (1998) Retòrica. Poètica. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
Cassany, Daniel (1992) Descriure escriure. Barcelona: Empúries.
Cassany, Daniel (1995) La cuina de l'escriptura. Barcelona: Empúries.
Chillón, Albert (1994) La literatura de fets. Barcelona: Llibres de l'Índex
García Damborenea, Ricardo (2000) Uso de razón. Diccionario de falacias. Madrid: Bibliotea Nueva.
Lodge, David (1998) L'art de la ficció. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
Marina, Juan Antonio (1992) Elogio y refutación del ingenio. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Miranda Alonso, T. (2002) Argumentos. Alcoi: Publicacions de la UV.
Pastor, Lluís (2008) Escriptura sexi. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
Sàez, Ferran (2003) Comunicació i argumentació. Barcelona: Trípodos.
Teruel, Elvira (1997) Retòrica, informació i metàfora. Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès): Servei de Publicacions de la UAB – Aldea Global.
Vega Reñón, Luis (2003) Si de argumentar se trata. Barcelona. Montesinos.
Vega, L. y Olmos, P. (2016). Compendio de lógica, argumentación y retórica. Trotta.
Weston, Anthony (1994) Las claves de la argumentación. Barcelona. Ariel.