Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2502443 Psychology | OT | 4 | 2 |
This course does not include prerequisites.
1. To distinguish among the main theoretical models in the study of collective processes and collective action.
2. To analyze psychosocial processes where social movements act as agents of change.
3. To highlight the main effects of social institutions upon social order.
1.- SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND PERSPECTIVES OF COLLECTIVE ACTION
2.- SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: COLLECTIVE ACTION AND SOCIAL CHANGE
3.- SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS, CONTINUITY OF THE SOCIAL ORDER
Theoretical sessions in large groups where teacher develops different arguments regarding the subject according previous readings.
Practical sessions analysing change and social reproduction dynamics.
Virtual discussions chaired by teachers
N.B. The proposed teaching and assessment methodologies may experience some modifications as a result of the restrictions on face-to-face learning imposed by the health authorities. The teaching staff will use the Moodle classroom or the usual communication channel to specify whether the different directed and assessment activities are to be carried out on site or online, as instructed by the Faculty.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Case study analysis | 12 | 0.48 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 6 |
Theory | 24 | 0.96 | 9, 7, 10 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 15 | 0.6 | 11 |
Virtual discussions | 7 | 0.28 | 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Documentation search | 9 | 0.36 | |
Group work | 15 | 0.6 | 8 |
Individual works | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 8, 11 |
Reading texts | 30 | 1.2 | 1 |
Study | 30 | 1.2 |
Evidence 1: Groupal case study report.
This evidence accounts for 40% of total grade.
Date: second evaluation period
Evidence 2a: Individual written test on the first part of the theoretical contents.
This evidence accounts for 22.5% of total grade.
Date: first evaluation period
Evidence 2b: Individual written test on the second part of theoretical contents.
This evidence accounts for 22.5% of total grade.
Date: second evaluation period
Evidence 3: Oral presentation of a reading linked to the theoretical sesion.
This evidence accounts for 15% of total grade.
Date: In each theory session.
Rating:
Passed: The subject will be considered passed if the student gets an average grade greater than 5 in the entire evaluation tests.
Evaluable: The student who has presented assessments weighing equal to 40% of the total subject will be considered Evaluable.
Non-evaluable: Students that have presented several assessments, the total weight in relation to the subject as a whole is less than 40%, will be considered not evaluable.
Reassessment: Those students that during the continuous evaluation have done evidences with a weight equal or bigger than ⅔ of the total qualification and have obtain a mark lower than 5 points and bigger or equal to 3.5 points. The judgment of passed subject will be the same that the one for the continuous evaluation, replacing only the marks of the recovered evidences. The maximum mark can’t be higher than 5, except in the case of the students that couldn’t present but have a justified reason (the teaching team will evaluate this cases).
It can also be presented to the reassessment those who with justified reasons couldn’t present to the evaluation of the evidences 2a and /or 2b.
Nounique final synthesis test for students who enroll for the second time or more is anticipated.
Evaluation Guidelines of theFaculty of Psychology: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EV1: Groupal case study report | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 6, 8, 11 |
EV2a: Individual written test on the first part of the theoretical contents | 22.5 | 1 | 0.04 | 5, 9, 7, 10 |
EV2b: Individual written test on the second part of the theoretical contents | 22.5 | 1 | 0.04 | 5, 9, 7, 10 |
EV3. Oral presentation of a reading linked to the theoretical sesion | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1, 11 |
Chihu Amparán, Aquiles. (2000). El análisis cultural de los movimientos sociales. Sociológica, 15(42), 209-230.
Chihu Amparán, Aquiles (2012). La teoría del framing: un paradigma interdisciplinario. Acta Sociológica, (59). Recuperado a partir de http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/33119