Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500260 Social Education | OT | 3 | 2 |
2500260 Social Education | OT | 4 | 0 |
This course is part of two mentions of social education, the mention of education of children and youth and adult education mention.
1. knowing closed and open institutions in the field of justice: prisons and juvenile justice centres.
2. Analysing the basic conceptual and regulatory framework regulating justice institutions.
3. Acquiring the concepts of reeducation, rehabilitation and social reintegration.
4. Knowing how to make reeducational treatment programs.
5. Analysing the functions of the social educator in institutions of justice and in open institutions.
Learning outcomes
1. To accept, understand and be sensitive to the population in social difficulty.
2. Acquire the procedural knowledge to perform an intervention program in educational fields of justice.
3. Acquire skills educational intervention with population under compliance with court orders.
4. To acquire values and attitudes of respect for the diverse social and cultural backgrounds that are characteristic of our contemporary societies.
5. Analyze the ethical aspects of social education in working with people at risk of exclusion.
6. Analyze the socio-historical evolution of different forms of marginalization and social exclusion.
7. Clarifying the dilemmas and ethical debates raised by working with marginalized populations in a situation of social inequality as the current one.
8. Understand and respect diversity as a factor of enrichment.
9. Understand the characteristics and conditions that make up the educational proposals in diverse contexts.
10. Knowing the theoretical and methodological foundations of health education.
11. Know the main lines of intervention of health education.
12. Design and implement educational prevention actions attitudes and actions of discrimination.
13. Design plans and programs for groups at risk of exclusion.
14. Develop orientation programs for socio employment.
15. Identify i appreciate the multiplicity of historical, social, political and legal references themselves inclusive education.
16. Plan and develop educational interventions with individuals and various groups.
17. Recognize the nature assimilationist, segregationist, integrative or inclusive of proposed educational action aimed at working with immigrant population.
18. Recognize foreigners or people belonging monitored groups (Gypsies b.p.) as citizens with full rights and freedoms on an equal basis to the entire citizenry.
19. Respect and value the potential ofall people regardless of functional limitations they may have.
20. Knowing attend the institutions belonging to the internal population justice according to their specific needs education.
Content
1. REEDUCATION AND REINTEGRATION
1.1. Definition and understanding of concepts
1.2. Differences with related notions
1.3. Conceptual and regulatory framework
1.4. Approach to the theories of the penalty function
2. PENITENTIARY SERVICES
2.1. Penitentiary centres: types and characteristics
2.2. Approach to basic regulations
2.3. Organisation of penitentiary and professional centres and generic functions they develop
2.4. Effects of deprivation of freedom on inmates
3. PENITENTIARY TREATMENT
3.1. Penitentiary treatment and rehabilitation programs
3.2. Functions of social educators in penitentiary centres
3.3. Skills of social educators in the penitentiary field
4. JUVENILE JUSTICE
4.1. Juvenile justice centres: types and characteristics
4.2. Approach to basic regulations.
4.3. Functions of social educators in juvenile justice centres
Student presentations, participatory work of case studies, simulations and discussion of articles or professional aspects of current events related to the subject.
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exhibitions by teachers the content and basic issues syllabus. It is done with the whole group and allows class exposure main contents through a open participation by students. | 45 | 1.8 | 5, 7, 15, 17 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Distance work directed from pautes provided by teachers. | 30 | 1.2 | 5, 7, 15, 17 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Own work to acquire the skills of self-regulated manner. | 75 | 3 | 5, 7, 15, 17 |
Assessment criteria
It will leave a system based on continuous assessment criteria, a fact that makes mandatory class attendance i will allow us to measure the degree program of specific skills that the student has achieved.
General criteria such as the level of student participation, the ability to relate the conceptual content with the procedural framed all ethical values of the profession are valued.
The evaluation will consist of three assessment data. A first consisting of passing an examination of all content working on the subject by explaining the teacher, graphic display document, readings, conclusions of group work, etc. which constitute 50% of the final qualification.
A second evaluation activity will be a final course work that its content will be agreed with the professor of the course, work will constitute 25% of the final qualification.
Finally 25% of the final qualification will be the result note of the work of analysis and synthesis groupware on monographic themes proposed by the teacher.
The evaluation of the subject related to the teacher's explanations and readings will be held on 27.01.2020. The date of the retake exam will be on 03.02.2020. In addition to the three assessment areas that determine the final grade, the general oral and written communicative competence will be valued, as well as a good command of the language.
A minimum mark of 40% of the grade must be reached in each evaluation area to make an average. To pass the subject a 5 out of 10 must be reached.
Attendance at lectures is compulsory. A minimum attendance of 80% must be accreditted to be able to take the final evaluation. Otherwise the person will be considered as having not attended.
The plagiarism of any text in the course work or the copy to the evaluation activities will lead to suspension.
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group work to be developed in relation to a specific topic to choose among several presented by the teacher | 25% | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 8, 11, 16, 15, 17, 12 |
Individual examination of the relevant contents. | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 18, 19, 20, 13, 8, 10, 9, 11, 14, 16, 15, 17, 12 |
Individual practical work to be proposed in class and will be resolved along the course. | 25% | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 8, 11, 16, 15, 17 |
Bibliography
AYO FERNÁNDEZ, M. (2004), Las garantías del menor infractor (Ley Orgánica 5/2000, de 12 de enero, sobre Responsabilidad Penal de los Menores y sus modificaciones posteriores), RdPP monografía, núm. 12, Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi.Institucions de justícia i reeducació 2015 - 2016
CANTARERO BANDRÉS, R. (2002), Delincuencia juvenil. ¿Asistencia terapéutica versus justicia penal?, Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja
CENTRE INICIATIVES PER LA REINSERCIÓ CIRE (2004): Centre Iniciatives per la Reinserció CIRE Presentació; Barcelona
COYLE, ANDREW. (2002): La administración penitenciaria en el contexto de los derechos humanos; Centro Internacional de Estudios Penitenciarios; Londres
FACAL FONDO, T. (2002): La reinserción social en el medio penitenciario 2002; Tesis Doctoral; A Coruña
LARRAURI, E., ROVIRA, M., SALES, A. (2017): Qualitat de vida als centres penitenciaris i programes d'intervenció; Centre d'Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada. Generalitat de Catalunya
LÓPEZ PAYAN, Samuel y otros (2018): Gènere i presó; Programa de perspeciva i equitat de gènere en l'àmbit penitenciari; Programa compartim; Edició Generalitat de Catalunya.
MANZANOS BILBAO, C., ELIAS, ANGEL, Y OTROS (2000): Cárcel, drogas y sida. Trabajo Social Frente al Sistema Penal; Salhaketa; Vitoria-Gasteiz
REDONDO, S.,(2000) Psicología aplicada: Los programas de rehabilitación en Europa. Barcelona
ROMANS, M., PETRUS, A. y TRILLA, J. (2000): De profesión, educador(a) social. Papeles de Pedagogía; Editorial Paidós; Barcelona
SAINZ, M Y GONZÁLEZ, S. (2004). "El Vis a Vis como un espacio psicoterapéutico para la reestructuración familiar dentro de la prisión". Comunicación del II Congreso la Familia en la sociedad del siglo XXI Fundación de Ayuda contra la Drogadicción.