Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2501002 Geography and Spatial Planning | OB | 3 | 2 |
There is no specific requirement to take this subject
The objective of the course is that students systematically reason about the procedures involved in the development of a research work in social sciences, emphasizing the elements of epistemology, methodology of the research process and the study of the main quantitative and qualitative methods.
1. Research in Social Sciences
1.1.Epistemological considerations (theory)
Positivism, Hermeneutics / Phenomenology
Paradigms
Scientific debates and geography
1.2. Methodological considerations (method)
Inductivism-deductivism
Quantitative-qualitative debate
Methodological triangulation
Structuring the research: conceptualization and measurement, operationalization, index and typologies
1.3. Ethical issues
2. Research process
Approach to the investigation. Initial questions
Objectives / Hypothesis / Research questions
Methodological design of the research
Analysis of the information
Dissemination of results
3. Methods
Quantitative methods: interview with questionnaire. sampling
Qualitative methods: observation
Qualitative methods: the interview
Qualitative methods: walking interviews and colective mapping
Analysis of documents and other methods
Theoretical classes on concepts and theoretical elements will be complemented by work on real research projects, which will allow students to reflect on the problems and difficulties of social science research.
Students must build, in parallel with the lessons, an original research project (thematic dimension, objectives, state-of-the-art and methods) as part of the training process in this course. It will be mandatory to read a series of basic texts on epistemological reflection, research design and methods.
The process of learning and acquisition of skills will be supervised by the teacher through individual and/or group tutorials. The teaching staff of the course will be available to the students to solve the doubts and follow the evolution of this learning process and acquisition of student competencies.
All the graphic information used by the lecturer in the theoretical classes and seminars as well as the different materials prepared by the students will be available in the Virtual Campus. In addition, the virtual campus will be the space that will convey the information related to the organization of the course.
The modality of virtual geography will follow the same index and the same contents will be worked on as in the presential modality.
The activities that could not be done onsite will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools. Exercises, projects and lectures will be carried out using virtual tools such as tutorials, videos, Teams sessions, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lessons | 45 | 1.8 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutories | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal work and completion of reviews and the course project | 52 | 2.08 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
The evaluation of the course will be based on the continuous evaluation of the process of acquisition of knowledge and competences by the student and will consist of:
Exam (40% note)
Course project (40%)
Complementary exercises, participation in class / forums (20%)
To pass the course, each of the different parts that are include in the evaluation must be exceeded (minimum of 5). Students will be suspended when, presenting the set of practices, the project course and the exam, will not arrive to a minimum of 5. Students who has delivered just a part of the materials will be considered as "not evaluable".
This course aims to follow a continuous assessment method. This course involves following the delivery schedule marked by the lecturer. It will be mandatory the strict compliance with delivery dates set in the calendar of practices and works. Late delivery will be penalized with a 20% each day of reduction of the grade.
There is a call for final re-evaluation for those students who have followed the course and have submitted to the final exam.
All evaluable tasks (including the exam) will have a maximum grade of 5.
Students who do not submit to the final exam and do not provide medical proof will be considered "not evaluable". Students will receive the grade ‘Not assessable’ instead of ‘Fail’ if they had only submitted part of the course exercises.
The copy or plagiarism of material, both in the case of works and in the case of exams, constitute a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero to the activity. In case of recidivism the entire subject will be suspended. Assessment acitivities with a zero grade because of irregularities can not be reassessed. We remind you that a copy of a work that reproduces all or a large part of a fellow's work is considered a "copy". "Plagiarism" is the fact of presenting all or part of a text by an author as his own, without citing the sources, whether on paper or in digital format. See the UAB's documentation on "plagiarism" at: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html.
At the time of completion of each evaluation activity, the lecturer will inform the students via moodle of the procedure and date of review of the grades.
In the event that assessment activities cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complementary exercices | 20% | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
Course project | 40% | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
Exams | 40% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6 |
Ayllón Pino, B. (2010), “Consejos prácticos para realizar una buena investigación” a E. Echart Muñoz, R. Cabezas Valencia, J.A. Sotillo Lorenzo (coords.), Metodología de investigación en cooperación para el desarrollo. Madrid: Catarata, pp. 57-74.
Babbie, E. (2010, 12è edició), The practise of social research, Wadsworth.
Brunet, I., Pastor, I., & Belzúnegui, A. (2002). Tècniques d'investigació social: Fonaments epistemològics i metodològics. Barcelona: Pòrtic.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). New York (US): Oxford University Press.
Capel, H. (1981), Filosofía y ciencia de la Geografía contemporánea. Barcelona: Barcanova.
Cea D’Ancona, M.A. (1996), Metodología cuantitativa: estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis
Cook, I. (1997), “Participant Observation” a R. Flowerdew, D. Martin (eds) Methods in Human Geography - a guide for students doing a research project. Longman: Essex, pp. 127-150.
Corbetta, P. (2007), Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Cloke, P. et al (2004), Practising human geography. Londres: Sage
Creswell, John W. (2003), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA).
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California (US): SAGE Publications Ltd.
Echart Muñoz, E., Cabezas Valencia R., Fernández García, M. (2010) "La estructura del proceso de investigación". a Echart Muñoz, E., Cabezas Valencia R., Sotillo Lorenzo, J. Á. Metodología de investigación en cooperación para el desarrollo. Madrid: Catarata, pp. 75-122.
Eco, U. (1977). Come si fa una tesi di laurea (1a ed.). Milano: Bompiani.
Estruch, J. (1992), "El conflicte quantitatiu/qualitatiu: un fals problema" a Técniques qualitatives en Ciències Socials. Cicle de conferències, Barcelona: Societat Catalana de Sociologia, pp. 7-16.
Flowerdew, R. (1997), Methods in Human Geography. A guide for students doing a research project, Harlow, Prentice Hall.
García Ballesteros, A., coord. (1998), Métodos y técnicas cualitativas en geografía social, Barcelona: Oikos-tau.
Guasch, O. (1997), Observación participante, Madrid, CIS.
Harper, D. (2002) "Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation", Visual Studies 17(1): pp. 13-26.
Hay, I. (ed.) (2005), Qualitative research methods in Human Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitching, Rob; Tate, Nicholas J. (2000), Conducting research into Human Geography. Theory, methodology and practice, Harlow, Prentice Hall.
Pujadas Muñoz, J.J. (1992), El método biogràfico: el uso de las historias de vida en ciencias sociales, Madrid, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Quivy, R., & Campenhoudt, L. V. (2001). Manual de recerca en ciències socials (2a ed.). Barcelona: Herder..
Rodríguez Osuna, J. (2005), Métodos de muestreo. Casos practices, Madrid: CIS.
Rose, G. (2008), “Using photographs as illustrations in Human Geography”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32 (1), pp. 151-160.
Silverman, D. (Ed) (1997). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage.
Taylor,S.J.; Bogdan, R. (1992), Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados, Barcelona [etc], Paidos (or. anglés, NY 1984).
Valles, Miguel S. (1999), Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional, Madrid: Síntesis.
Valles, Miguel S. (2002), Entrevistas cualitativas, Madrid: CIS.
Vilagrasa, J. (1989), "Novela, espacio y paisaje. Sugerencias para una geosofía estética", Estudios Geográficos, 191, pp. 271-285