Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500249 Translation and Interpreting | OB | 3 | 1 |
Students with C1 can understand a wide range of demanding, long texts, and recognise implicit meaning; they can express themselves fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions; they can use language flexibly and effectively for social, academic and professional purposes; they can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices.
Translation competence is more than simply substituting words from one language to another. It encompasses a number of interrelated linguistic and extra-linguistic sub-competences. Translators, as a mediators between cultures and languages, should be able to understand cultural references.
The translator’s intercultural competence involves a deep knowledge and understanding of both source culture and target culture as well as abilities to perform cross-cultural comparisons, and attitudes of flexibility, open-mindedness, and adaptabiliy. Identifying, interpreting and translating "culturemes" (cultural references) is a complex task that requieres practice and training.
By the end of the course the students will be able to:
"Culturemes" designates a variety of phenomena related to:
1. Natural culture: toponymy, climate, living species, natural resources, landscapes,places, etc.
2. Material culture: art, buildings, monuments, clothing, and other objects.
3. Social, historic and folkloric culture: historical facts and characters, legends, festivities, popular beliefs, etc.; conventions and social habits : moral values, politeness, gestures, eating manners, everyday activities, etc.; Social organisation: political, legal and educational systems, etc.
4, Religious culture and spirituality.
5. Conceptual culture.
6. Linguistic culture: proverbs, interjections, idioms, curse words, etc.
7. Cultural interferences
All activities have a deadline that must be met, according to the proposed schedule.
Work by students mainly consists in assisting to the lectures, research and analysis of information and assignments.
The readings are aimed to enable assignments.
The different exercises will be returned with comments and guidelines for further improvement.
The main tools used will be: course materials, complementary readings material, and course schedule.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 3, 1, 8, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 |
Oral and written productions | 30 | 1.2 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervising oral and written productions | 35 | 1.4 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study | 60 | 2.4 | 1, 8, 6, 7 |
The following information concerning student evaluation is only a general orientation. The lecturer will provide a detailed description at the beginning of the semester.
Revision
Prior to formally entering final marks, the lecturer will publish the date / time for assessment revision and the final mark.
Recovery
Students have the right to resit or make up evaluated work providing they have submitted a minimum of 66.6% (two thirds), or more, of the formally assessed work, and who have an average of 3.5 or more.
The lecturer will inform students of the procedure for resitting or making up evaluated work. The lecturer may require an individual assignment / test to make up for each failed evaluated task, or task not performed, or choose to combine failed assessed tasks for the same purpose.
"No-evaluable" mark
A mark of (N/A Not Assessable) will be awarded if a student fails to hand in less than 30% of the assessed work.
Plagiarism, copying, identity theft
In cases of plagiarism, copying, identity theft, etc. in an evaluation activity, a mark of "0" will be given. If such a case is detected over more than one of the evaluable exercises then the student will be given a final mark of "0" for the course.
A student does not have the right to resitting or making up work in cases of plagiarism, copying or identity theft.
Special cases
Students whose mother tongue is French will have to achieve the same assessment conditions than the rest of students.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Active student participation | 10% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11 |
Oral exercices and tests | 45% | 6 | 0.24 | 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 8, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 |
Written exercises and tests | 45% | 6 | 0.24 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 |
Bibliography
Adoumié, Vincent (dir.). Géographie de la France. Hachette, 2013.
Avezou, Laurent. 100 Questions sur les mythes de l'histoire de France. Les Éditions de La Boétie, 2013.
Bancel, Nicolas. et al. Ruptures postcoloniales. Les nouveaux visages de la société française. La Découverte, 2010.
Blanchard, Pascal et al. Décolonisations françaises. La chute d'un empire. Éditions de la Martinière, 2020.
Blanchard, Pascal. La France noire. La Découverte, 2011.
Blum Le Coat, Jean-Yves (dir.). Les immigrés en France. La Documentation française, 2014.
Boucheron, Patrick. (dir.). Histoire mondiale de la France. Le Seuil, 2017.
Citron, Suzanne. L'histoire de France autrement. Éditions de l'Atelier, 1992.
Citron, Suzanne. Le mythe national. L'histoire de France revisitée. Éditions de l'Atelier, 2008.
Cordonnier, Jean-Louis. Traduction et culture. Didier, 1995.
Être Français. Le Monde, hors-série, mars 2016.
Greffe, Xavier et al. La politique culturelle en France. La Documentation française, 2015.
Marchon, Olivier. Atlas de la France incroyable. Autrement, 2014.
Morrison, Donald ; Compagnon, Antoine. Que reste-t-il de la culture française?. Denoël, 2008.
Noiriel, Gérard. Une histoire populaire de la France. De la Guerre de Cent Ans à nos jours. Agone, 2018.
Nora, Pierre (éd.). Les lieux de mémoire. Tome 1. LaRépublique; Tome 2. La Nation; T. 3. Les France. Gallimard, 1984-1992.
Prédal, René. Histoire du cinéma français. Des origines à nos jours. Nouveau monde éds., 2013.
Rochet, Caroline. Comment (ne pas) devenir Parisien. Leduc.s éditions, 2010.
Spear, Thomas C. (ed.). La culture française vue d'ici et d'ailleurs. Treize auteurs témoignent. Karthala, 2002.
Waline, Charles et al. Les institutions de la France en questions. La Documentation française, 2013.
Yahi, Naïma. et al. La France arabo-orientale. La Découverte, 2013.
Webography
Media
Le Monde: http://www.lemonde.fr/
Libération: http://www.liberation.fr/
Courrier international: http://www.courrierinternational.com
Le Figaro, http://www.lefigaro.fr
Les Inrockuptibles: http://www.lesinrocks.com/
L'Express: www.lexpress.fr/
Le Point: www.lepoint.fr/
Le Nouvel Observateur: http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/
Marianne: http://www.marianne.net/
Charlie Hebdo: http://charliehebdo.fr/
Africultures: http://www.africultures.com/
France Culture : https://www.franceculture.fr/
France Inter : https://www.franceinter.fr/
Radio France Internationale : https://www.rfi.fr/fr/
Arte: http://www.arte.tv/fr
TV5 monde : http://www.tv5.org/TV5Site/enseigner-apprendre-francais/accueil_apprendre.php Arte: http://www.arte.tv/fr/70.html/
Institut National de l'Audiovisuel (INA): http://www.ina.fr/
Varia
Atlas sonore des langues régionales de France : https://atlas.limsi.fr/
BNF: http://classes.bnf.fr/index.php/
Encyclopédie Larousse en ligne : https://www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie
Hérodote. Le média de l'Histoire : https://www.herodote.net/
L'Histoire pour tous : https://www.histoire-pour-tous.fr/
La documentation française : www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/
Lumni enseignement : https://enseignants.lumni.fr/