Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500246 Philosophy | OB | 2 | 1 |
There are no special prerequirements. A previos information: Jèssica Jaques and Gerard Vilar are both the teachers responsable of the course.
The general objectives of the course are:
The specific objectives of the subject are:
RANCIÈRE, J., Sobre políticas estéticas. Barcelona, Macba, 2005 . Chapters 1 and 2
1. Mimesis
PLATO, book X of the Republic.
ARISTOTLE, Poetics. [selected fragments]
2. Expression
KANT, I., Critique of judgment §§ 23–29
3. Form
BENJAMIN, W., The work of art in the age of its technical reproducibility.
4. Symbol
JAQUES, J., La Estética del Románico y el gótico. Chap. IV, el Símbolo 2003.
HEGEL, Lessons on Aesthetics (Introdution). (1835)
CASSIRER, E.,”Art”, Chap. IX Philosophical Antropology.(1944)
5. Aesthetic experience / Taste
[VOLTAIRE, "Goût", Encyclopédie (1757)]
KANT, I., Critique of judgment §§ 1–22
6. Arts
GOODMAN, "When is Art?", Ways of worldmaking.
HEIDEGGER, M, The origin of the artwork (1936) (selected fragments)
NIETZSCHE, F., The birth of tragedy
NOË, A. Strange Tools. Art and Human Nature (selected fragments)
The methodology is Neosocratic, that is: the generation and the transfer of knowledge from the vindication of the formative potential of both students and teachers. It is directed from the Artencurso Teaching Innovation Project, of which Jèssica Jaques is Principal Investigator. In this teaching innovation project, various degrees are involved: Philosophy, History of Art, Musicology, Design, Dance and Choreography, with special attention to its intersection. The scope of action is the route of learning outside the classroom into the classroom, in this direction. The pedagogical model is the neosocratic one. The scope is that of applied aesthetics, in an effort to professionalize philosophical-artistic projects of incidence in the public sphere.
The directed activities consist of discursive praxis classes, as well as a tutorial system of small groups and individuals for the elaboration of conceptual maps with formative validity.
The supervised activities consist of artistic praxis workshops and visits to exhibitions, as well as written tests, contributions in artistic research and contribution to the seminars. There will be a special emphasis on the student linking his discursive praxis to aesthetic practices according to the procedures of applied aesthetics.
Autonomous activities focus on the readings, their conceptual systematization, and on the application of argumentation and the vocabulary of evaluable texts to aesthetic practices.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures, seminars, small-group and individual tutorials | 60 | 2.4 | 4, 26, 10, 13, 18, 21, 22, 23, 3 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Workshops on aesthetic practices, exhibition visits, artistic events, tests, participation in seminars | 30 | 1.2 | 17, 8, 2, 26, 11, 6, 16, 15, 12, 25, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual and group readings, making of conceptual and evolutive maps | 52 | 2.08 | 2, 11, 20, 5, 16, 25, 7, 24 |
Assessment will be carried out continuously and evolutionarily. There will be three compulsory and one optional assessment items.
The compulsory ones will be : Tests 1 and 2, to be done at home. For the first test, the student will have chosen a creative practice, either their own or from a third person, that they will maintain throughout all assessments. The two tests will be sent by email one week before their submission. Test 3: a written text with documentation (if appropriate) of its video/audio/image record or of the literary for the six aesthetic concepts of this course. Maxim. 3000 words. All tests will be submitted by email to the address <esteticatroncal@gmail.com>. If the student finds themselves in the situation of the digital gap, they will communicate it to Jèssica Jaques beforehand, before the deadline of the first test, and an institutional solution will be proposed.
In principle and except for changes in the day to day of the Faculty or force majeure, the days of the tests/submissions are: October 16 (test 1), November 16 (test 2) and January 15 (test 3). We will try to make Test 1 correspond to the first and second concepts, and Test 2 correspond to the third and fourth concepts. Test 3 will include the six concepts of the course. The three compulsory tests will have the same value each - 2.5 points. That means a maximum of 7.5/10 in total. In addition, the student is invited to submit the optional Logbook that will be sent every two weeks to the address <esteticatroncal@gmail.com> under specific requirements and will be evaluated with a maximum of 2.5 points; submissions must be punctual and every two weeks from October 1, which means one submission each of the following dates: October 1, October 15, October 29, November 5, November 19, December 3, and December 17.these dates are deadlines and cannot be replaced for posterior dates. A follow-up on the submissions through tutorials in office hours is highly encouraged.
Assessment will be not only continuous, but evolutionary, which means the final grade will not be the average of the three tests, but rather a final evaluation of the student's formative evolution will be made.
The second-chance test, with date and place set by the Faculty, is reserved for students who have not done one of the tests (being compulsory to submit 2/3 tests) on the day indicated in the calendar or who have failed one, two or three compulsory test. Each test must be passed independently of the others.
The student's grade will be "not evaluable" if at the end of the process they have not submitted one, two or three compulsory tests.
The evaluation criteria will be:
The ordinary revision will be carried out after each test until the date of submission of the next test, during the usual office hours. The ordinary global revision of the course will be made on a specific day that will be indicated in January, and will take place in the office.
Students are encouraged to come to work in the office their aesthetic / artistic references and their logbooks. Once the subject is finished, you will be invited to contribute to the artencurs blog: <https://artencurs.wixsite.com/artencurs>
All the important indications will be written in Moodle, in order to leave a public written record.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Logbook | 25 % | 5 | 0.2 | 4, 8, 26, 1, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 3 |
three papers online | Three exercices 25 % each one | 3 | 0.12 | 4, 17, 8, 2, 26, 1, 9, 11, 19, 20, 13, 5, 6, 16, 14, 15, 18, 12, 25, 21, 7, 22, 23, 24, 3 |
1. Compulsory readings (to be downloaded from web <greta.cat/grau>)
ARISTÒTIL, Poètica. Barcelona, Ed. 62.[textos sel·leccionats]
BENJAMIN, W., La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. Madrid, Taurus (1935)
CASSIRER, E.,”Arte”, Antropologia filosófica. FCE (1944)
GOODMAN, "When is Art?", Ways of world making. NY, Hacked publishing, 1978.
HEGEL, Lliçons d’estètica (Introducció). Barcelona, ed. 62 (1835)
HEIDEGGER, M, El origen de la obra de arte. FCE. (1936)
JAQUES, J., La Estètica del Románico y el gótico. Madrid, Antonio Machado, 2003.
KANT, I., Crítica de la facultat de jutjar. Barcelona, Ed. 62, 2004 (1790) [textos sel·leccionats]
NIETZSCHE, F., El Nacimiento de la tragedia. Madrid, Alianza Editorial
NOË, A. Strange Tools. Art and Human Nature. NY, Hill and Wang, 2015.
PLATÓ, llibre X de la República. Madrid, Gredos.
RANCIÈRE, J., Sobre políticas estéticas. Barcelona, Macba, 2005 [Caps- 1 i 2]
VOLTAIRE, "Goût", Encyclopédie, 1757
2. Secondary Bibliography
ARNHEIM, R., Arte y percepción visual, Alianza Forma, Madrid, 2002
BARASCH, M., Teorías del Arte: De Platón a Winckelmann, Alianza, Madrid, 1991; Modern Theories of Art, 1: From Winckelmann to Baudelaire, New York UniversityPress, New York, 1990; Modern Theories of Art, 2: From Impressionism to Kandinsky, New York University press, New York andLondon, 1998.
BOZAL, V., Historia de lasideas estéticas I iII, Historia 16, Madrid1998; (ed.), Historia de las ideas estéticas y de las teorías artísticas contemporáneas. Visor, Madrid, 1996.
CARROLL, N., Philosophy of Art. Routledge, 1999.
CASACUBERTA, D., “Nueve escollos para entender la cultura digital”. Enrahonar: Quaderns de filosofía, ISSN 0211-402X, Nº 32-33, 2001, pags. 235-244
DAVIS, S., The Philosophy of Art. Blackwell, 2006.
DANTO, A. C., El abuso de la belleza. La estética y el concepto del arte. Paidós, Barcelona, 2005.
DANTO, A., “La obra de arte y el futuro histórico”, La madonna del futuro. Paidós, Barcelona, 2003 (2000).
FISHER, E., La necesidad del arte. Barcelona, Nexos, 1993 (1959)
GAUT, B.; LOPES, D. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics.Second Edition, Routledge, 2005.
GOMBRICH, E. H., Breve historia de la cultura, Ediciones Península, Barcelona, 2004.
GOMBRICH, E. H., La historia del arte. Madrid, Phaidon (1950).
GUASCH, Anna Maria (coord.), La crítica de arte, Ediciones del Serbal, Barcelona, 2003.
JAQUES, J.,“El sentido estético”, Disturbis 3 <http://www.disturbis.esteticauab.org/Disturbis234/Disturbis_3.html>
JAQUES, J., , “Ernst Cassirer y la urdimbredelamemoria simbólica”, Er 33, pp. 59-73,2004.
JAQUES, J., “Neokantisme i neokantians”, Enrahonar 23, 1995, 35-69.
JAQUES, J., “Notícia d’Ernst Cassirer”, Enrahonar 24, 199.
JAQUES, J., “Friendships are not in heaven. The Genealogy between Aristotle’s Philia and Kant’s Aesthetic Disinterestedness”. Revista de Filosofía, Vol. 37, n. 2 (2012): 55-68.
JAQUES, J. (ed.), “Pels camins de la raó crítica”, 36 (2004), número extraordinari sobre Kant en el segon centenari.
JAUSS, H. R., Pequeña apología de la experiencia estética. Barcelona, Paidós, 2002 (1972)
JIMENEZ, M., ¿Qué es la estética?, Barcelona, Idea Books, 1999.
JIMÉNEZ, J., Teoría del Arte, Tecnos, Madrid, 2002.
KELLY, M., (ed.), Oxford Enciclopedia of Aesthetics, 1998. 2a edició, 2014. (Especialment recomanat)
KIERAN, M., (ed.), Contempory Debates in Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art. Blackwell, 2006.
KRIS, E. i KURZ, O., La Leyenda del artista, Ensayos Arte Cátedra, Madrid, 1982.
LAMARQUE, P., – H. OLSEN, H., (eds.), Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. The Analytic Tradition. An Anthology. Oxford, Blackwell, 2004.
LYNCH, Enrique, Sobre la belleza,Anaya, Madrid, 1999.
LEVINSON, J., Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, 2003.
MURRAY, Chris, Key Writers on art: From Antiquity to the Ninetenth Century, Routledge, London and new York, 2003; Pensadores clave sobre el arte: elsiglo XX. Ensayosarte Cátedra, Madrid 2006.
NIETZSCHE, F., El naixement de la Tragèdia. Madrid,Alianza Editorial, 1995 (1872).
RAMIREZ,J.A. Ecosistema y explosión de las artes. Anagrama, Barcelona 1994. (Especialmentrecomanat)
SHINER, Larry,La invención del arte, Paidós Estética 36, Barcelona, 2004.
TATARKIEWICZ, e., Historia de seis idees. Madid, Taurus, 1987 (1976). (Especialment recomanat)
VALVERDE, J. M., Breve historia y antología de la estética, Barcelona, Ariel. (Especialment recomanat)
VILAR, G., Las razones del arte. Madrid, Antonio Machado, 2005.
VILAR, G., La desartización del arte. Universidad de Salamanca, 2012.
C. Online sources
http://esteticauab.org/home.html
https://vimeo.com/instituthumanitatsbcn
https://www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/history
https://www.edx.org/
http://www.canal-u.tv/producteurs/universite_de_tous_les_savoirs