Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2501573 Economics | OT | 3 | 2 |
2501573 Economics | OT | 4 | 0 |
UAB courses (for UAB students): Mathematics I, Mathematics II, Microeconomics I, Microeconomics II
General (for exchange students): courses on intermediate microeconomics and knowledge of basic mathematic tools for economic analysis (algebra and calculus)
1. Develop the concept of comparative advantage as a key aspect for commerce.
2. Understand the role of the endowment of factors for the development of international trade.
3. Analyse the behaviour of firms regarding the opportunities and challenges that trade presents in a globalised world.
4. Understand the different mechanisms available to governments to regulate international trade.
5. Study the logic of political decisions in terms of international trade and their economic and political impact.
PART I: THEORY ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE
1. Absolute and comparative advantage. The Ricardian model
2. The specific factors model and the distribution of income
3. Initial endowments and trade. The Heckscher-Ohlin model. The Stolper-Samuelson model
4. Firms’ behaviour in front of international trade
PART II: INTRUMENTS AND POLICIES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE
5. Tariffs and other instruments of international trade
6. International trade policies
Combination of both theoretial and practical approaches, including: theoretical lectures, supervised study, problem solving, preparation of individual and group activities and presentations, and office hours follow-up.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classes with the main instructor | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 8, 4, 13, 12, 7, 5 |
Problem sets and other activities | 19.5 | 0.78 | 1, 2, 3, 8, 6, 9, 11, 4, 10, 13, 12, 15, 7, 14, 5 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Office hours | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 8, 6, 9, 11, 4, 10, 13, 12, 15, 7, 14, 5 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Problem solving and preparation of activities | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 3, 8, 6, 9, 11, 4, 10, 13, 12, 15, 7, 14, 5 |
Study | 52 | 2.08 | 1, 2, 8, 6, 11, 4, 13, 12, 7, 14, 5 |
The course evaluation will consist in several evaluative activities. These activities and their share on the final grade are:
Option A:
30% mid-term exam 1 + 30% mid-term exam 2 + 20% presentation + 20% activities
This option require scoring -at least- 40/100 in each mid-term exam.
Option B:
50% final exam + 20% presentation + 30% activities
This option require scoring -at least- 40/100 in the final exam.
If applying the above mentioned weights the qualification of the student is 5/10 or higher, the course is considered passed and this will not be subject to a new evaluation. In the case of a grade less than 3.5/10, the student will not pass the course. For those students who have obtained a grade that is equal to or greater than 3.5/10 and less than 5/10, there will be a re-take exam. The re-take exam grade will be qualitative and will only have two possible outputs: PASS or NO PASS. If the student obtains a PASS grade, they will pass the course with a maximum numerical grade equal to 5/10. If the student gets a NO PASS score, the final grade will be equal to the one obtained before the re-take.
A student is considered to be "Not Evaluated" in the subject if he/she has not participated in any of the course activities. Therefore, if a student attends one or more activities of the evaluation, he/she can no longer opt for a "Not Evaluated".
Those students who attend the subject for the second, third or fourth time have the option to follow the continuous assessment or to present themselves directly to the final exam, which will mean that it will count 100% of the final grade.
Calendar of evaluation activities
The dates of the evaluation activities (midterm exams, exercises in the classroom, assignments, ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.
The date of the final exam is scheduled in the assessment calendar of the Faculty.
"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity." Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB). Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' reschedule
https://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/application-for-exams-reschedule
Grade revision process
After all grading activities have ended, students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.
Retake Process
"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject." Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.9.
The date of the retake exam will be posted in thecalendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who takethis exam and pass, will get a grade of 5 for the subject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, student will fail the course.
Irregularities in evaluation activities
In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exams | 60% | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 2, 8, 4, 13, 12, 7, 5 |
Other evaluation activities | 40% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 8, 6, 9, 11, 4, 10, 13, 12, 15, 7, 14, 5 |
Main texts:
International economics: Theory and policy
Krugman, Obstfeld and Melitz
Pearson, 2018 (11th ed.)
Advanced International: Trade Theory and Evidence.
Robert C. Feenstra,
Princeton University Press, (2nd Edition)