Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Gestión de los Recursos Humanos en las Organizaciones | OP | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisites.
This module explores how the application of new technologies in organisations has an influence in various psychosocial phenomena which are of great significance in the understanding, decision-making and management of human resources.
Upon completion of the module the student will be able to:
Describe the characteristics, constraints and effects of the relevant psychosocial phenomena and processes in order to understand the day-to-day operation of an organisation.
Analyse various problematic and organisational situations according to the related psychosocial aspects.
Explain the relationships between different processes, human resources, new technologies and psychosocial processes.
1.- The Digital Culture Technological revolution
New digital skills.
Digital economy.
2.- Generations
New expectations. Digital natives.
Managing the millennials.
The impact of the digitalisation of teams.
How to improve work processes in virtual environments.
Work skills in virtual teams.
4.- Critical Aspects
Critical Management Studies, Power and Ethics.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exercises and games | 15 | 0.6 | |
Master class | 15 | 0.6 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Defence of an Action Plan | 2 | 0.08 | |
Group tutorials | 30 | 1.2 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Research and review of bibliography, case analysis | 58 | 2.32 |
Lectures. The presentation of the various topics will be done through lectures given by the teaching staff who are responsible for this module.
Case presentations. Cases related to the various content topics will be analysed in the classroom to review practical actions of professionals.
Exercises. Dynamic exercises and role playing and experiments will also be carried out which will allow students to solidify their knowledge and work on the competencies assigned to the module.
<tdvalign="top" width="72">15
Title |
Hours |
ECTS |
Learning Outcomes |
Type: Directed |
|
|
|
Master class |
0.6 |
2 |
|
Exercises and games |
15 |
0.6 |
1, 4 |
Type: Supervised |
|
|
|
Defence of an Action Plan |
2 |
0.08 |
2 |
Group tutorials |
30 |
1.2 |
3 |
Type: Autonomous |
|
|
|
Research and review of bibliography, case analysis. |
58 |
2.32 |
2, 3, 4 |
Title |
Hours |
ECTS |
Learning Outcomes |
Type: Directed |
|
|
|
Master class |
15 |
0.6 |
2 |
Exercises and games |
15 |
0.6 |
1, 4 |
Type: Supervised |
|
|
|
Defence of an Action Plan |
2 |
0.08 |
2 |
Group tutorials |
30 |
1.2 |
3 |
Type: Autonomous |
|
|
|
Research and review of bibliography, case analysis. |
58 |
2.32 |
2, 3, 4 |
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment 1: Self-reflection on the dynamics carried out in class (individual) | 33% | 9 | 0.36 | CA13, SA23, SA24, SA25 |
Assessment 2 Analysis and resolution of a practical and applied case study (groupal) | 33% | 12 | 0.48 | CA14, CA15, KA18, SA23, SA24 |
Assessment 3 Analysis and resolution of a case study (individual) | 33% | 9 | 0.36 | CA13, KA18, SA23, SA24 |
Evidence 1. Self-reflection on the dynamics carried out in class, as well as the skills and learning put into practice. This will be individual evidence, with a weighting of 33%.
Evidence 2. Analysis and resolution of a practical and applied case study on organizational, labor, and human resource dynamics. This will be group evidence, with a weighting of 33%.
Evidence 3. Analysis and resolution of a case study applied to personnel selection and in the context of human resources. This will be an individual assignment, with a weighting of 33%.
The final grade for the course will be the sum of the grades for each of the three pieces of evidence, with a weighting of 1/3 (33%) for each piece of evidence.
Single assessment
Academic regulations of the Autonomous University of Barcelona https://www.uab.cat/doc/tr_normativa_academica_uab
Article 265. Single assessment:
2. Requesting single assessment means waiving continuous assessment and involves submitting the necessary number of pieces of evidence on a single date to prove and guarantee that the learning objectives and outcomes established for the course have been achieved.
Single assessment does not mean that students do not have to attend classes. During classes, students may carry out activities that are necessary to satisfactorily complete the assessment evidence.
Students who choose the single assessment option must notify the course coordinator at the beginning of the semester and, once the module has been completed, submit the same evidence as for the continuous assessment option.
The assessment system will be the same as for continuous assessment.
Retakes
Students who have not met the criteria for passing the module and those who have been assessed in a set of activities with a minimum weight of 2/3 of the total module grade may opt forrecovery.
The minimum grade to be eligible for recovery is 3.5.
Assessment guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology https://www.uab.cat/doc/doc_pautesavaluacio_fp_23-24
The feedback of each piece of evidence will be carried out in two ways: 1) In writing, via Moodle, with comments and general areas for improvement, as well as the strengths of the submissions and evidence; or 2) Orally in class, with individual follow-up and feedback on each student's learning.
For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translations. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty on the activity grade, or more severe penalties in serious cases.
Barry, D.; Hansen, H. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of New Approaches in management and Organization, Londres: Sage.
Beranek, P. M., y Martz, B. (2005). Making virtual teams more effective: improving relational links. Team performance management, 11(5/6), 200-213.
Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X., y Wilbon, A. D. (2015).Rethinking virtuality and its impact on teams. Small Group Research, 46(3),267-299.
Martín, A; Rubio. R (2015) Jóvenes y generación 2020. Revista de Estudios de Juventud. 108. Madrid
Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., y Peiró, J. M. (2011). Gestión de equipos virtuales en las organizaciones laborales: algunas aportaciones desde la investigación. Papeles del Psicólogo, 32(1), 82-93.
Tabernero, C. (2010) Efectividad de los Equipos de Trabajo, una revisión de la última década de Investigación (1999.2009). Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 26,1, 47-71.
Tirado, F. Baleriola, E y Gálvez A. (2017). Critical Management Studies. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
Zuboff, S. (2020). La Era del Capitalismo de la Vigilancia. Paidós.
-
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Spanish | first semester | afternoon |