Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Content follow-up tests	30%	0	0	8, 7, 2
Oral presentation	10%	0	0	11, 6
Participating in classes and debates	10%	0	0	11, 6
Realization of assignments	50%	0	0	1, 4, 5, 3, 10, 9

1. 1.     Evaluation

The final grade will result of combining four ways of evaluating the academic performance:

1.-Carrying out essays that will be the 50% of the final grade. 50%

2.-Taking a type test exam about the reading of a text. The qualification of this test will be a 30% of the final grade.

3.-Oral presentation to the class of one of the readings of the course, valued at 10% of the final grade.

4.-Class attendance and participating in debates and academic controversies that will take place in class. This will be a 10% of the final grade.

 

2. Reevaluation

Students will be entitled to reassessment in the course if they have been evaluated on a set of activities accounting for at least two-thirds of the total course grade.

Both the test and the essay can be retaken. Assistance and participation and oral presentation will be not evaluated a second time.

Only students who have failed the test or the essays previously will be suitable for retaking either one or both of them, as long as their final mark for the module is below 5 points. Students with a higher final grade than 4,9 will not be able to retake any activity.

 

3. Not evaluable

It will be considered non-assessable when less than 85% of the assessable evidence is provided.

 

4.Ordinary revision of the evaluation activities

In the case of not agreeing with the marks given to each different evaluation activity, the student will have the right to an ordinary revision of those with the professor. The date and time of this revision will be announced on the Virtual Campus module’s class.

5.Extraordinary revision of the module’s final mark

In case of not agreeing with the final qualification of the module, the student will have the right to ask for an extraordinary revision. He or she will have to fill a reasoned request to the Communication Sciences Faculty office within the fifteen days following the publication of the final mark. The revision will be carried outfollowing the extraordinary revision instructions approved by the Faculty Board on the 5^th of May of 2016, whichcan be found on the Faculty’s web:http://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/grados/informacion-academica/evaluacion/revision-extraordinaria-de-la-calificacion-final-1345717361537

 

6. Single assessment

This module does not include a single assessment system.

 

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for tasks such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translations. Students must clearly identify any parts generated with these technologies, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how AI has influenced the process and final outcome of the assignment. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty to the assignment grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases. Teachers will be able to use tools to detect similarities or plagiarism and tools to detect the use of generative artificial intelligence.

PLAGIARISM: The student who performs any irregularity (copy, plagiarism, identity theft) that can lead to a significant variation of the qualification of an evaluation act, will be qualified with 0 this act of evaluation. In case there are several irregularities, the final grade of the subject will be 0.

NOTE: The proposed teaching methodology and evaluation activities may undergo some modifications depending on the health authorities' attendance restrictions.