Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Activitats diverses a l'aula - Entrega evidències	20	0	0	2, 3, 4, 6, 5
Debate	20	0	0	2, 4, 6, 5, 1
Primer parcial	30	1.5	0.06	3, 5
Segon parcial	30	1.5	0.06	3, 5

 

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

Note: To be eligible for continuous assessment, students must:

• Attend both partial exams.

• Have completed and submitted at least 70% of classroom activities.

• Have completed the "Citizen Debate" activity, including all required submissions and oral presentations.

Students who cannot attend classes regularly must opt for single assessment.

Weight of each component in continuous assessment:

• First partial exam: 30%

• Second partial exam: 30%

• In-class activities: 20%

• “Citizen Debate” activities: 20%

---

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

The single assessment will consist of:

• A written exam synthesizing course knowledge: 50%

• An individual written summary of the required readings: 25%

• An individual written synthesis of assigned papers: 25%

To be eligible for single assessment, students must submit all required work by the established deadline.

---

REQUIREMENTS TO PASS

To pass the course, in either assessment method, students must:

• Obtain a minimum grade of 4 (out of 10) in the average of the two partial exams or in the synthesis exam.

• Achieve a final grade equal to or greater than 5.0 out of 10.

If a student fails to meet one of these requirements but obtains a grade equal to or greater than 3.5, they will be entitled to a make-up exam. This final exam will allow them to pass the coursewith a grade of 5.0 out of 10.

---

PLAGIARISM

If a student commits any irregularity that could significantly alter the assessment result, the activity in question will be graded with a 0, regardless of any disciplinary process that may follow.
If multiple irregularities occur in the assessments of the same course, the final grade for that course will be 0.

---

 

This subject allows the use of AI technologies as an integral part of the submitted work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection.
The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.