Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

To pass the course, the following must be taken into account:

• Attendance on the field trip is strictly mandatory.

• Students must have completed the practical exercises, contributed to the design and setup of the exhibition, and delivered a public presentation of the exercises.

• A minimum grade of 3.5 is required in each of the five assessable activities, regardless of their weight in the final grade.

• Among the failed activities, only the written exam on the course content and the practical exercises may be retaken. If either one has already been passed, it cannot be repeated.

• If a student commits any irregularity (plagiarism or fraudulent behavior) that could significantly alter the evaluation of an activity, that activity will receive a grade of 0, regardless of any disciplinary proceedings that may follow. In cases of multiple irregularities within the same course, the final grade for the course will be 0. Additionally, these evaluation activities will not be eligible for resit.

• A student will receive a “not assessable” grade if they have completed less than 30% of the evaluation activities.

• The final grade, calculated based on the weighted average of the five assessable activities, must be a pass (between 5 and 10 points). A final grade between 0 and 4.8 will be considered a fail.

Additional relevant information:

• This course does not allow for a single assessment model.

• Students have the right to review the grades of all assessment activities. The teaching staff will inform them of the procedure and review date.

• The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as part of the work process, as long as the final result reflects a significant personal contribution from the student in terms of analysis and critical thinking. The student must clearly identify which parts were generated using AI tools, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how they influenced the process and the final result. Lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may lead to a lower grade or more serious penalties in severe cases.

• Copying or plagiarizing material, whether in assignments or exams, constitutes academic misconduct and will be penalized with a zero on the activity. In case of repeated offenses, the entire course will be failed. Please note: “copying” refers to submitting work that replicates all or most of someone else’s work. “Plagiarism” refers to presenting all or part of someone else’s text as your own, without citing the sources, whether printed or digital. See UAB documentation on plagiarism: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html