Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Education Studies | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Management and leadership of educational institutions is part of a series of courses aimed at providing a minimum level of specialization in organization and management of educational organitzations and training. Taught in 3rd year for which it is considered that students have already acquired a number of competencies related to knowledge of structures and the operation of organizations. It is also assumed that they have taken, or are taking, the subject of Organizational Development.
The subject presented, in the third year of the Pedagogy degree, is the second part of the subject “Coordination and Management of Educational Institutions” and is complemented by the subject “Organizational Development of Educational Institutions”. These two subjects form the foundation of the 4th year “Management of Training and Socio-Educational Institutions”. Placing students in the processes of change and improvement of organizations, this subject focuses on analyzing the role of managers as agents of change.
Its goals are:
PART 1: Leadership in organizations
1. Interpersonal power and leadership
2. Leaderdhip Theories
3. Leadership in educational contexts. The feminization of the profession and leadership.
PART 2: The management of educatioal institutions and leadership
1. Conceptualizations, the nature and functions of management
2. Managers as agents of change
3. Participatory Management
PART 3 : Strategies and tools for managers
1. Self Management strategies
2. Management strategies
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Big group face to face | 15 | 0.6 | 6, 10, 12 |
Seminars | 30 | 1.2 | 6, 7, 9, 12 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activities | 30 | 1.2 | 6, 9 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous activities | 75 | 3 | 10, 12 |
It is considered, that the main person in the teaching-learning process is the student and it is under this premise that the methodology of the subject has been planned. The lecturer will offer summaries and analyses of the content of the subject. She will also propose challenges, problems and cases to be solved by the students, according to the theory learned, and will facilitate discussions by objectives and learning through group techniques.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Classroom Practices (Teamwork) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 3, 6, 7, 10, 9, 11, 12, 4 |
Self-directed program (individual task) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 5, 1, 6, 10, 12 |
Written Test (individual task) | 40% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 6, 7, 10, 9, 8, 12, 4 |
The continuous assessment of the subject will be carried out throughout the course through the activities shown in the grid.
The subject is face-to-face. It is for this reason that attendance at the guided activities is considered an essential requirement to be able to pass the subject and a minimum attendance of 80% is established (36 hours, which means a maximum of 2 classroom sessions of possible absences). The supporting documents presented do not exempt from attendance. In the event of prolonged illness that prevents being in the classroom, the student must contact the professor, and the situation will be studied individually.
To apply the percentages that appear in the grid and pass the subject, each of the three-assessment evidence must be passed with a 5 out of 10:
1. The exam on May 15th or, if it has been failed, the retake exam on June 26th.
2. The individual self-leadership work (the due date and, if applicable, the retake date will be indicated at the beginning of the subject).
3. The teamwork of classroom practices (the due date and, if applicable, the retake date will be indicated at the beginning of the subject).
The grades of the evaluation evidence will be announced during the three weeks following their delivery. The results of the evaluation will be discussed in a large group and/or individually during the tutorial hours,if necessary.
Those who take the single assessment must submit on May 15 the evaluation evidence that the teacher will explain at the beginning of the course. These four pieces of evaluation evidence are:
1. A theoretical in-depth work on the contents of the subject (individual work) (20% of the final grade)
2. A self-leadership work (individual work) (20% of the final grade)
3. A practical in-depth work on the contents of the subject (individual work) (20% of the final grade)
4. A written exam (individual assignment) (40% of the final grade)
The works will be presented in writing and orally on May 15th in a session in which the teacher will ask questions about them, to ensure authorship.
For all students, regardless of the assessment method chosen (continuous or single):
- In case of failing some of the four pieces of evaluation evidence, they can be re-presented to recover them on June 26th. To pass the subject, each of the evidence must be approved with a minimum of 5. The review of the final grade will follow the same procedure as for continuous assessment. Those who have not submitted any of the assessment evidence will be considered non-evaluable. In the event of failing one of the pieces of evidence and passing the others, the grade that will appear on the transcript will be that of the part that was failed. In the event of failing more than one, the grade that will remain will be the highest of the failed ones.
- In all activities (individual and group) linguistic correction, writing and formal aspects of presentation will be considered. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. Any activity may be suspended if the teacher considers that these requirements are not met.
- In the works, the sources must be cited within the text and the final bibliography must follow the APA regulations (2019, 7th version).
-In addition to all the above, to pass this subject it is essential toshow behavior compatible with the educational profession: active listening, respect, participation, cooperation, empathy, kindness, punctuality, non-judgment, argumentation, appropriate use of electronic devices (mobile, computer, etc.), etc.
- The use of generative artificial intelligence is permitted only in the following support tasks: bibliographic search, text correction and translations. The student must clearly identify which tasks have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
- Copying or plagiarism, in any type of assessment test, as well as the use of artificial intelligence, constitute a crime and will be penalized with a 0 (zero), losing the possibility of recovering it, whether it is traced.
MAIN REFERENCES
Aronson, E. (2000). El animal social. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Gairín, J. Antúnez, S. (Eds.) (2008): Organizaciones educativas al servicio de la sociedad. Madrid: Walters Kluwer.
Gairín, J.; Castro, D. (2021). El contexto organizativo como espacio de intervención. Madrid: Síntesis
Tomàs, M. (2012). El Lideratge Educatiu i Tècniques de Direcció. Bellaterra: UAB
Yulk, G. (2008). Liderazgo en las organizaciones. 6ª ed. Pearson: Madrid.
Yulk, G. & Gardner, W. L. (2019). Leadership in organizations, global edition. Georgia: Pearson Education.
COMPLEMENTARY REFERENCES
Acosta, J.M. (2019). Dirigir. Liderar, motivar, comunicar, delegar, dirigir reuniones. Madrid: ESIC
Alberoni, F. (2003): L’art de liderar. Barcelona: Gedisa
Alonso, M. (2004): Madera de líder. Claves para el desarrollo de las capacidades de liderazgo. 2ª ed.. Barcelona: Empresa activa.
Alvarez, S. y Güell, M. (2019). La dirección de sí mismo: Orientaciones para directores y directoras escolares. Barcelona: Horsori.
Bates, B. y Bailey, A. (2018). Educational Leadership Simplified. A guide for existing and aspiring leaders. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Bizarra, L. y Casanova, O. (2021). El liderazgo humilde de los mandos intermedios: Los que consiguen que las cosas se hagan, cambien y sucedan. Madrid: Narcea.
Berkovich, I. y EYAL, O. (2020). A model of emotional leadership in schools. Effective leadership to support teachers’ emotional wellness. London: Routledge.
Blanchard, K. (1990): El poder ético del directivo. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
Blanchard, K.H. (2004): La píldora del liderazgo. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
Billson, S. (2021). Leadership for mental wellbeing in the secondary school. Implementing whole school strategies. London: Routledge
Bolívar, A. (2019). Una dirección escolar con capacidad de liderazgo pedagógico. Madrid: La Muralla.
Boyle, B. y CLARKE, P. (2019). The headteachers as effective leader. London: Routledge.
Browne, L. (2020). Effective School Leadership in Challenging Times. A practice-first, theory-informed approach. London: Routledge.
Cardona Herrero, S. (2019). Coaching para todos. Claves para el desarrollo personal y profesional. Pozuelo de Alarcon: ESIC
Castro, D. & Tomàs, M.(2010).El gobierno y la gestión de la universidad: estudio de los órganos unipersonales. Estudios sobre Educación..(19).165-184.
Covey, S. R. (1991): El liderazgo centrado en principios. Barcelona: Paidós.
de Toni, A. y de Marchi, S. (2022). Self-organised schools. Educational leadership and innovative learning environments. London: Routledge.
Dinham, S., Elliot, K., Rennie, L. y Stokes, H. (2018). I’m the Principal. Madrid: A.C.E.R.
Druker, P. (2000): El management del siglo XXI. Barcelona: Edhasa.
Druker, P. F. (Ed.) (1996): El líder del futuro. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Essomba, M. A. (2006): Liderar escuelas interculturales e inclusivas. Equipos directivos y profesorado ante la diversidad cultural y la immigración. Barcelona: Graó.
Farrell, A. (2021). Exploring the affective dimensions ofeducational leadership. London: Routledge.
Fleming, P. (2019). Successful middle leadership in secondary schools. Apractical guide to subject and team effectiveness (2n edition). London: Routledge.
Fullan, M. (2020). Liderar en una cultura de cambio. Madrid: Morata.
Gairín, J. y Mercader Juan, C. (Eds.). (2018). Liderazgo y gestión del talento en las organizaciones. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer.
García Arias, T. (2020). Cómo mejorar la calidad educativa del centro. De la dirección al aula. Madrid: Pirámide.
Goleman, D.; Boyatzis, R. i McKee, A. (2002): El líder resonante crea más. El poder de la inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Plaza y Janés.
Graham, S. (2021). Autoliderazgo - Para liderar a otros primero lidérate a ti mismo. Taller del éxito: Colombia.
Grottenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C. y Rönnerman, K. (2020). Middle leadership in schools. A practical guide for leading learning. London: Routledge.
Heras, J. (2003): El bastón del líder. Fundamentos para la práctica del liderazgo. Barcelona: Mtm.
Harland, J. (2020). Leading a school culture of learning. How to improve attainment, progress and wellbeing. London: Routledge.
Harpham, M. (2021). The school leader’s year. Month by month progress, every lesson, every day. London: Routledge.
Hernández Flores, C. y Martínez-Vilanova Martínez, R. (2019). Los 100 errores en el liderazgo. Pozuelo de Alarcon: ESIC.
Hunter, J. C. (2005): La paradoja. Un relato sobre la verdadera esencia del liderazgo. 14ª ed. Barcelona: Urano.
Johnson, C.E. (2019). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Casting light or shadow. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing.
Kapsto, S. (2006): Cuatro retos para un líder.Barcelona: RBA Integral.
Kelly, A. (2021). Dynamic management and leadership in education. High reliability techniques for schools and universities. London: Routledge.
Landri, P. (2020). Educational leadership, management, and administration through actornetwork theory. London: Routledge.
Lowe, B. (2022). El liderazgo intermedio. Herramientas para una gestión competente en las escuelas del siglo XXI. Madrid: Narcea.
Menéndez, P. (2020). Escuelas que valgan la pena. Cómo liderar procesos de cambio en la escuela. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Paidós.
Miras, J. (2022). Claves para mejorar el papel de la dirección escolar y el liderazgo educativo. Sevilla: McGraw Hill.
Murphy, C. y D'Auria, J. (2020). The influential school leader. Inspiring teachers, students, and families through social and organizational psychology. London: Routledge.
Northouse, P.G. (2019). Introduction to Leadership. Concepts and practice (Fifth edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publishing.
OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. París: OECD Publishing.
O'Neill, B. (2003): Cómo evaluar y mejorar su capacidad de liderazgo. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
Richards, G. y Wheatley, C. (Eds.). (2021). Innovative school leadership. Transforming practices. London: Routledge.
Richardson, J., Bathon, J. y McLeod, S. (2021). Leadership for deeper learning. Facilitating school innovation and transformation. London: Routledge.
Romain, S. (2019). Habilidades directivas. Transformando organizaciones. Liderar el cambio. Pozuelo de Alarcon: ESIC.
Roth, J.C. (2022). School crisis response. Reflections of a team leader. London: Routledge.
Sala, M. (2006): El encanto de Hamelín.Secretos delliderazgo efectivo. Barcelona: Alienta.
Sale, J. y THOMAS, J. (2019). Mapping motivation for leadership. London: Routledge.
Samier, E.A. y Milley, P. (Eds.). (2020). Educational Administration and leadership identity formation. International theories, problems and challenges. London: Routledge.
Simon, S. (2021). School principal development. Theoretical and experiential approaches for educational leaders. London: Routledge.
Skea, R. (2021). Leadership, organizational change and sensemaking. London: Routledge.
Sonnenfeld, A. (2020). Liderazgo ético. Sevilla: Editorial Aula Magna Proyecto Clave McGraw-Hill.
Stein, G. (2002): Dirigir en tiempos de incertidumbre. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
Woods, P. A. y Roberts, A. (2018). Collaborative School Leadership. A critical guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
ANOTHER RESOURCES:
• Academic Leader
• Educational leadership journal
• Educational Leadership
• Emprendedores (especialment la col·lecció “Herramientas de desarrollo profesional del siglo XXI”) (2003): gestión eficaz del tiempo, liderazgo de equipos de alto rendimiento, negociación y solución de conflictos, generación y desarrollo de ideas innovadoras, gestión del talento y promoción profesional, habilidades de comunicación...)
• Leader to leader
• Organización y gestión educativa
• The Chronicle of Higher Education
• The leadership & organization development
Congressos:
• Congrés Interuniversitari d’Organització Escolar
• Congreso Internacional sobre Dirección de Centros educativos
• Jornadas andaluzas sobre organización y dirección de centros educativos.
• Jornades sobre direcció de la FEAE (Fòrum Europeu d’Administradors de l’Educació)
No specific software is used beyond the usual office tools and the TEAMS platform if necessary.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 311 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 312 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 3 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |