Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Psychology | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
No previous requirements.
Time is not a specific stimulus that activates any sensory receptor and, nevertheless, it is still an explicit and implicit dimension of human behaviour. The reality of time is only perceived through changes in the different stimuli, for example in location, texture, shape, etc. and the events that occur in the context. Despite its ephemeral nature, time is a dimension that interacts broadly with many human and non-human behaviours.
The main goal of the subject is to describe, analyse and verify experimentally the incidence of time as an independent variable on behaviour. From a cognitive perspective, it has been shown that behaviour is not only developed in time but also structured by it. This has been verified in micro behaviours, such as a driver who avoids a car crash, as well as in social and organizational behaviours. Different cultures have different attitudes and conceptualizations of time, despite having common underlying neurological and physiological structures related to temporality.
In addition to this, different types of behaviour show different cycles of activation and performance in some tasks also varies across the day, which allows us to determine what the optimal time to perform certain activities is. The disciplines of Chronobiology and Chronopsychology focus on these aspects, which are relevant to the field of work (work shifts, job satisfaction, performance, etc.). Orientation and Temporal Perspective towards the past, present or future exert great influence on everyday behaviour, to the point that this orientation is considered to be an indicator of psychological well-being and a predictor of behaviour in some situations.
Optimal time management should take into account all levels in which temporality influences behaviour: from Chronobiology to Temporal Orientation, also considering temporal estimation/perception processes.
Cultural anthropology and time. Time and behaviour. Brief history of the measurement of time. Temporal regulation: chronobiology and chronopsychology. The perception of time: estimation and temporal experience. Quantitative and qualitative study of time perception. The development and acquisition of the notion of time. Dominance/control or time management: orientation and temporal perspective. Temporal planning. Applications in the field of work, health and organizations.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 18 | 0.72 | 3, 7, 10, 5, 4, 9, 13, 21, 12, 14, 19, 16, 20, 18 |
Practical sessions | 12 | 0.48 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 11, 21, 15, 20, 18 |
Theoretical sessions about the essay | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 5, 6, 13, 12, 14, 19, 16, 20, 18 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervision | 37.5 | 1.5 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 7, 5, 6, 4, 9, 13, 21, 12, 14, 15, 19, 16, 20, 18 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Bibliographic search | 6.5 | 0.26 | 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 5, 6, 4, 9, 13, 21, 14, 19, 16, 20, 18 |
Development of the research project or study (exam) | 38 | 1.52 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 11, 21, 15, 20, 18 |
Practical and theoretical essays writing | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 7, 5, 6, 4, 9, 13, 21, 12, 14, 19, 16, 18 |
A combination of teaching methods to promote student learning will be used. 1) Lectures: in these sessions the lecturers cover the basic concepts and notions of the subject, 2) Practical activities and exercises, 3) Seminars centred on developing the research project.
Different methodologies, such as written theoretical exercises and message boards on Moodle will be used. A group research project will be developed during the semester and will be delivered as a written essay and presented orally.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EV1. Research project | 35% | 0 | 0 | 2, 3, 7, 6, 4, 9, 13, 11, 21, 14, 15, 19, 16, 20, 18 |
EV2. Oral presentation of the research project | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 15, 19, 20, 18 |
EV3. Questionnaire (theoretical content) | 25% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 10, 5, 8, 13, 21, 12, 15, 16, 18 |
EV4. Practical essays | 20% | 0 | 0 | 2, 17, 11, 21, 15, 20, 18 |
The subject will be assessed as follows:
Attendance is mandatory on the day the assessable evidence is scheduled. In the case of practicals, non-attendance on the scheduled day will result in a No Show and can only be resit if a supporting document is presented and the evidence is completed and submitted individually within a maximum of 48 hours, provided that the responsible teacher has authorized it.
Regarding feedback:
Type of feedback |
EV |
WEEK |
Written |
EV1 and EV4 | The week the grades are published |
Digital tool |
||
At classe |
EV2 | Last week of teaching |
Tutorial |
EV3 | The week the grades are published |
Definition of Pass
The final grades of the subject, after the resit, must be expressed with a single decimal, and the adjustment is carried out in the case that thisadjustment allows a qualitative change of the grade when it is one tenth away. Examples: PASS: 4.85 (4.9=5.0) / NOTABLE: 6.85 (6.9=7.0) / EXCELLENT: 8.85 (8.9=9.0)
Students will not be assessed if they fail to deliver coursework representing at least 40% of the total marks available, but at least one should be EV3 or EV4 (individual work). If this requirement is met, the final grade will consist of the weighted average of the 4 activities (essay + oral communication + questionnaire + practical essays). To pass this course students must achieve a minimum final grade of 5/10.
To be eligible to participate in the resit process, it is required for students to have previously been assessed on at least 2/3 of the total evaluation activities. Additionally, it is required to have achieved an average final grade of the subject of less than 5 and equal to or higher than 3.5. The reassessment will consist of delivering the failed or non-delivered work and in case of passing, the maximum grade of the reassessed work will be of 5.
The UAB assessment regulations can be found on the following link: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
A final synthesis test for students who enrole for the second time or more is not envisaged.
Translation of exams
TRANSLATION OF THE ASSESSMENT TESTS WILL BE ISSUED IF THE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 263 ARE MET AND THE REQUEST IS MADE BEFORE WEEK 4 TELEMATICALLY (E-FORM) (more information on the Faculty's website).
Single evaluation
The single evaluation will be carried out on the same day and place as the test of the second evaluation period and all the contents of the subject will be evaluated. It will include: an open-type exam about the entire theoretical content, a written detailed empiricalresearch proposal, an oral defense of the proposal, as well as the delivery of the practical reports. Duration 3 hours. The final grade for the course will be obtained as described above.
THE SINGLE EVALUATION MUST BE REQUESTED TELEMATICALLY (E-FORM) IN THE SPECIFIC PERIOD (more information on the Faculty's website)
SINGLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY |
|||
Name and description |
Weight |
Duration (in hours) |
Date |
EV1: Written empirical research detailed proposal | 25% | 3 hours |
Second assessment period |
EV2: Oral defense ofthe research proposal | 10% | ||
EV3: Open-type exam about the theoretical content | 45% | ||
EV4: Delivery of the practical reports | 20% |
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Permitted use: In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.
Elemental references:
There is no specific text book. Supplementary material will be given throughout the course.
Complementary references:
Adan, Ana (2012). Circadian typology: A comprehensive review. Chronobiology International, 29(9), 1153-1175.
Fraisse, Paul (1967). Psychologie du temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Madrid, Juan Antonio & Lama, Mª Ángeles (2006). Cronobiología Básica y Clínica. Madrid: Editeca Red.
Meck, Warren; Doyère, Valérie, & Gruart, Agnès (2012). Interval timing and time-based decision making. Front. Integr. Neuroscience, 6(13). doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00013
Sánchez-López, Maria Pilar (1999). Temporalidad, Cronopsicología y diferencias individuales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces, S.A.
Strathman, Alan & Joireman, Jeff (2005). Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Zimbardo, Philip & Boyd, John (2009). The time paradox. Ebury Press.
No specific software is required.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 11 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |