Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Exam	40	2	0.08	CM16, CM18, KM16, SM09, SM10, SM12
First continuous assessment test	30	1.5	0.06	CM16, CM18, KM16, SM09, SM10, SM12
Work feasibility study	30	0	0	CM16, CM18, KM16, SM09, SM10, SM12

EVALUATION:

 In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, as long as the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a penalty in the activity grade or more severe sanctions in serious cases.

This subject does not offer the option for comprehensive evaluation.

 

 

The continued evaluation of Finances II consists of three components:

a) A partial with the first part of the course with a weight of 30%

b) Delivery of a roadworthiness study with a weight on the final grade of 30%.

c) Final exam (40% of the grade)

When the student is considered to have not been able to provide sufficient evaluation evidence, this subject will be considered non-evaluable.
Schedule of evaluation activities

The dates of the different evaluation tests (partial exams, exercises in the classroom, delivery of works, ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.

The date of the final exam of the subject is scheduled in the exam calendar of the Faculty.

"The programming of the evaluation tests can not be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation act can not be carried out, in this case, the persons responsible for the qualifications, after consulting the teaching staff and to the affected student body, they will propose a new program within the corresponding academic period. " Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB)

The students of the Faculty of Economics and Business who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation date must present the request by filling in the document Request reprogramming test https://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/nou-reprogramacio-de-proves
 

Procedure for review of qualifications

Coincidingwith the final exam will be announced the day and the medium in which the final grades will be published. In the same way, the procedure, place,date and time of the review of exams in accordance with the regulations of the University will be informed.

 

Recovery Process

"To participate in the recovery process the students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities that represent a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject or module." Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). The students must have obtained an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.8.

The date of this test will be scheduled in the exam calendar of the Faculty. The student who presents himself and passes it will pass the subject with a grade of 5. Otherwise, he will keep the same grade.

 

Irregularities in evaluation acts

Notwithstanding other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the event that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, it will be scored with a 0 evaluation act, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, thefinal grade of this subject will be 0 ". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations)