Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Primary Education | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This subject is part of the Inclusive Education subject. In the context of the current inclusive school, it is necessary to have a context in which the teacher is an innovator agent and manager of the diversity that eases the transformation of the ordinary school with the aim to increase its capability to attend all the students giving emphasis to students with specific cognitive learning needs.
The two aims to achieve are:
BLOCK A: THEORY FOUNDATIONS
1. Cognitive development and basic cognitive process: Attention, perception and memory. Learning process: interpersonal, intrapersonal and socio-environmental factors
2. Intellectual skills concept ( high skills and incapacity)
3. Evaluation of the high skills and the intellectual handicaps. Improvement of the detection and the later physiological assistance. Strong and weak points.
4. Educational Services for the intellectual handicaps and high skills.
BLOCK B: TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
5.Educational bases of the cognitive processing models: models, functions, styles and strategies.
6.Students symbolic Language and cognitive disabilities.
7. educational development strategies for the different cognitive syndromes
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Big group activities : Lectures,document analysis, students expositions, cine-forum, etc. | 45 | 1.8 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Non presential work based on guidelines. | 30 | 1.2 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual and group work to prepare papers, lectures and case analysis. Study of the contents and exam preparation | 75 | 3 |
Activities in this course are autonomous, supervised and guided.
There will be 15 minuts of a class to allow students to assess the course as well as the lecturers involved.
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ev1: Syndrom's presentation (oral and individual) | 16% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 4, 8, 5, 7, 9 |
Ev2: Practical paper: the decalogue (written and groupal) | 17% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 4, 8, 9 |
Ev3: Poster elaboration and presentation (oral/written and individual/groupal) | 17% | 0 | 0 | 3, 2, 1, 4, 8, 5, 7, 6, 9 |
Ev4: Test (written and individual) | 50% | 0 | 0 | 8, 5 |
|
Evaluation activities
|
Grade % |
Learning results |
BLOCK A |
Writing test 25% Practical project: 25% |
50% |
E1, E2, E3 |
BLOCK B |
Writing test: 25% Practical project : 25%
|
50% |
E2, E4, E5 |
All assessments must be passed with a minimum score of 5 in order to achieve an average mark. If any of the sections (either failed or marked as “Not Presented”) are not passed, it will be considered that the minimum requirements have not been met, and the course will be failed with the corresponding grade of the failed section. Reassessment will consist on repeating the failed activity.
This course is divided into two thematic blocks, structured as follows:
The assessment will be based on a written exam, which will account for 50% of the final grade. The remaining 50% will come from a practical project, divided into 3 separate parts, all of which must be passed with a minimum score of 5.
To pass this course, students must demonstrate good general communicative competence, both oral and written, and a solid command of the language(s) used in the course, as specified in the syllabus.
The results of each evaluation must be published on the virtual campus within a maximum of 20 days after its completion. A review date must be offered within 10 days of the publication of results.
If any of the blocks are not passed (due to a fail or a “Not Presented” mark), this means that the expected minimum will not have been achieved, and the course will be failed with the grade corresponding to the failed block. If it is determined that the student has not provided enough assessment evidence, the subject will be marked as “Not Assessable.”
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are allowed as part of the course project development, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student, including personal analysis and reflection. Students must clearly identify which parts were generated using AI, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced the process and final outcome. Lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a penalty of 0 in the activity.
According to UAB regulations, plagiarism or copying of any work or written test will result in a grade of 0 for the entire course, with no opportunity to retake it—whether the work was individual or group-based (in which case, all group members will receive a 0). If, during an individual in-class assignment, the instructors determine that a student is attempting to cheat or is found with unauthorized documents or devices, the student will receive a 0 with no possibility of recovery, thereby failing the course.
Continuos Assessment:
Submission Date |
Assessment Activity |
% of Final Grade |
Learning Outcomes |
11/03/26 |
EV1: Oral presentation of syndromes (Individual). Submission until 18/03/26 |
16% |
E1, E2, E5 |
25/03/26 |
EV2: Written group project – “The Decalogue” |
17% |
E1, E2, E5 |
20/05/26 |
EV3: Infographic presentation + materials (Individual and Group) |
17% |
E1, E2, E5 |
03/06/26 |
EV4: Written exam (Individual) |
50% |
E2, E4, E5 |
17/06/26 |
Reassessment |
— |
E2, E4, E5 |
Attendance at in-person sessions is mandatory. Students must attend at least 80% of the sessions. Specific cases, questions, suggestions, etc., must be addressed to the lecturer responsible for the relevant block.
Single Assessment Option:
This course allows fora single assessment option. All activities are individual.
Submission Date |
Assessment Activity |
% of Final Grade |
Learning Outcomes |
03/06/26 |
EV1: Written project – “The Decalogue” |
25% |
E1, E2, E5 |
03/06/26 |
EV2: Poster + materials + oral presentation |
25% |
E1, E2, E5 |
03/06/26 |
EV3: Written exam |
50% |
E2, E4, E5 |
17/06/26 |
Reassessment |
— |
— |
Reassessment will consist on repeating the failed activity.
IMPORTANT NOTES:
Key bibliography
AAIDD (2010). Intellectual Disability. Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Traducció al castellà: AAIDD (2011). Discapacidad Intelectual. Definición, Clasificación y Sistemas de Apoyo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
AAMR (2007). Escala d’intensitat dels suports. Manual de l’usuari. Barcelona: APPS.
AAMR (2006). El retard mental. Definició, classificació i sistemes de suport. Vic: EUMO Editorial. (Aquesta obra és la traducció al català del Manual de l'AAMR de 2002).
Arellano, A. y Peralta, F. (2013). Autodeterminación de las personas con discapacidad intelectual como objetivo educativo y derecho básico: estado de la cuestión. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 1 (1), 97-117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5569/2340- 5104.01.01.05
Duran, D., Giné, C. y Marchesi, A. (2010). Guia per a l’anàlisi, la reflexió i la valoració de pràctiques inclusives. Barcelona: Departament d’Educació.
Departament d’Ensenyament (Generalitat de Catalunya) (2013). Les altes capacitats: detecció i actuació en l'àmbit educatiu - Guia per a mestres i professors, Servei de Comunicació i Publicacions.
Departament d’Ensenyament (Generalitat de Catalunya) (2013). Les altes capacitats: detecció i actuació en l'àmbit educatiu - Guia per als equips d'assessorament i orientació psicopedagògica (EAP) i els orientadors dels instituts, Servei de Comunicació i Publicacions.
Echeita, G. i Aiscow M. (2010). La Educación inclusiva como derecho. Marco de referencia y pautas de acción para el desarrollo de una revolución pendiente. Ponencia II Congreso Iberoamericano de Síndrome de Down. https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/stmaria/sarrio/DOCUMENTOS,%20ARTICULOS,%20PONENECIAS,/Educacion%20inclusiva%20como%20derecho.%20Ainscow%20y%20Echeita.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights – FRA (2014). The fundamental rights of persons with intellectual disabilities and persons with mental Health problems. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2010/fundamental-rights-persons-intellectual-disabilities-and-persons-mental-health
Federació Allen i Càtedra de Innovació Social de la Universitat de Lleida. Alsinet, C., Feliu, B., Torres, M. (2017). Revisió del model dels serveis de suport per a les persones amb discapacitat intel·lectual i del desenvolupament. http://www.allem.cat/uploads/news_files/0bf2671633e5c53f6e825fc29584731b5fb930af.pdf
Giné, C. (coord.); Basil, C.; Bolea, E.; Díaz-Estébanez, E.; Leonhard, M.; Marchesi, A.; Riviére, A. y Soro-Camats, E. (2003).Trastorns del desenvolupament i necessitats educatives especials. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
Pallisera, M. (2011) Apoyando proyectos de vida inclusivos: Claves para transformar las prácticas socioeducativas de personas adultas con discapacidad intelectual. Revista de Educación Inclusiva 3(3), 69-87.
Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Vilà, M., Jiménez, P., Castro, M., Puyaltó, C., Montero, M. y Martín, R. (2014). Análisis de los apoyos que reciben los jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual en su transición a la vida adulta en España: una investigación a partir de experiencias de profesionales y personas con discapacidad”, Revista Española de Discapacidad, 2 (2), 27-43.
Salazar Chavez, B. M. (2017) La lectoescritura como facilitador de la integración social en alumnos con discapacidad intelectual. Ciencia y futuro 7(1), 147-162.
Sánchez, J. L. (2004) Enseñar a leer a los alumnos con discapacidad intelectual: una reflexión sobre la pràctica.
Bibliografia complementària
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). Ecología del desarrollo humano. Cognición y desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós. http://psicopedagogosrioiv.com.ar/wordpress%20colegio/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/la-ecologia-del-desarrollo-humano-bronfenbrenner-copia.pdf
Diari Ara 06/12/2018. Unes 100.000 persones amb discapacitat intel·lectual podran votar en les pròximes eleccions generals. http://www.ara.cat/societat/100000-persones-discapacitat-podran-votar-proximes-eleccions_0_2138186284.html
DINCAT. Autogestors i autorepresentació. http://www.dincat.cat/ca/autogestors-i-autorepresentació_13139
Font, J. (2005). La evaluación del alumnado con retraso mental. En A M. Sánchez-Cano, A. M. i Bonals, A. J. (Coords.). La evaluación psicològica. Barcelona: Graó, pp.417-450.
Flórez, J. (2014). Retos de la Neurociencia en el Siglo XXI. El reto de la discapacidad intel·lectual. Conferencia pronunciada en la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina, Madrid, 6 de junio de 2014.
Gifré Monreal, M. i Esteban Guitart M. (2012). Consideraciones educatives de la perspectiva ecològica de Urie Bronfenbrenner. Contextos Educativos: Revista de Educación 15, 79-92. ConsideracionesEducativasDeLaPerspectivaEcologicaD-3972894.pdf
Laborda, C. y González, H. (2017). Estudio cualitativo sobre discapacidad intelectual y trabajo protegido. La orientación como herramienta para mejorar la calidad de vida. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía 28 (3), 82-98.
Plancarte, P. (2017). Inclusión educativa y cultura inclusiva. Revista Nacional e Internacional de Educación Inclusiva, 10(2) pp 213-226.
Plena inclusión. Una educación inclusiva para una vida plena. Recuperat el 29/04/2019. https://www.plenainclusion.org/que_hacemos/educacion-inclusiva
Plena inclusión. Programa de ciutadania activa. Recuperat el 05/04/2019. https://www.plenainclusion.org/que_hacemos/apoyamos-a-las-personas/ciudadania-participacion
Serra, M. (2008). Quiet. Editorial Empúries.
Sole, A. (2016) Tinc una discapacitat, no una diversitat funcional. Diari ARA. https://www.ara.cat/societat/discapacitat-no-diversitat-funcional_0_1588041214.html
Thomson, J. R.; Schalock, R. L.; Agosta, J.; Teninty, L. y Fortune, J. (2014). How the Supports Paradigm Is Transforming the Developmental Disabilities Service System. Inclusion, 2 (2), 86-99.
Verdugo, M.A. y Bermejo, B.G. (2009). Discapacidad intelectual. Adaptación social y problemas de comportamiento. Madrid: Pirámide.
Vives, M. y Miralles, F. (2014). Si creus en mi, et sorprendré. Barcelona: Columna Edicions.
Web sites:
There is no specific hardware.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 901 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 90 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |