Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

The course will be assessed continuously. Attendance is recommended, given the active and participatory methodology of the sessions.

SUBMISSIONS. Throughout the course there will be two submissions of assignments:

The first, during the first half of November. The activities to be submitted are:

• Activities derived from the readings and viewings (Block I. Art and Education. CULTURAL DIMENSION). INDIVIDUAL
  
  

• Complete structure of the portfolio / website / artistic education journal (Blocks I and II). INDIVIDUAL
  
  

The second, during the third week of January. This final submission will be accompanied by the final portfolio (both the content and the presentation will be assessed). The activities to be submitted are:

• Complete contents of the portfolio / website / artistic education journal (Blocks I and II). INDIVIDUAL
  
  

• Two-dimensional and three-dimensional artistic practices (Block II. Training in art practice. PRODUCTIVE DIMENSION). INDIVIDUAL
  
  

• Two-dimensional and three-dimensional artistic practices (Block II. Training in art practice). GROUP
  
  

RESIT. The resubmission period is scheduled for the last week of January. The activities that can be resubmitted are:

• Activities derived from the readings and viewings (Block I. Art and Education. CULTURAL DIMENSION). INDIVIDUAL
  
  

• Complete contents of the portfolio / website / artistic education journal (Blocks I and II). INDIVIDUAL
  

The maximum grade for resit will be 5.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT. Students may request a single assessment. This will take place at the end of the course (see schedule).

• The assessment tasks for students who opt for single assessment will be the same as for continuous assessment; however, group work will need to be completed individually.

• The same resit system will apply to both continuous and single assessment.

• The review process for the final grade will follow the same procedure as for continuous assessment.

   

The course instructor will specify the assignments to be submitted, their format, and the exact submission date (a tentative date is provided in the schedule).

Within the three weeks following the submission of the assessment evidence, students will be informed of their grades (via the virtual campus), and a date will be set for grade review and feedback on the assignments.

To pass this course, students must demonstrate strong general communication skills, both oral and written, as well as a good command of the course language(s) specified in the syllabus. The assessment will also consider teamwork and collaborative skills and will be sensitive to gender perspective issues.

As a mandatory requirement to pass the course, students must display attitudes and aptitudes compatible with the teaching profession, such as: active listening, responsibility, respect, active participation, cooperation, empathy, kindness, punctuality, non-judgmental behavior, ability to argue, appropriate use of electronic devices (mobile phone, laptop, etc.), and critical thinking. Conduct that promotes a friendly and positive classroom environment, based on democratic values and the respect and appreciation of diversity, will be required.

A student will be considered not assessable if they fail to submit all the required components (assessment evidence) both on the virtual campus and in their portfolio/website.

Plagiarism or copying of material—whether in assignments, practicals, or exams—is considered a serious offense and will result in a grade of 0 for the entire course. An assignment or activity will be considered “plagiarized” when a part of another author’s text is presented as one’s own without proper citation, regardless of whether the source is in print or digital. An assignment, activity, or exam will be considered “copied” when it reproduces all or part of another student’s work.

In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted solely for support tasks such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translation. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using AI, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools haveinfluenced the process and final result of the activity. A lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may lead to partial or full penalization of the activity’s grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.