Basic framework of security technologies.

Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Examination of the topic	20%	0	0	1, 4, 21, 5, 7, 8, 2, 9, 12, 14, 20, 19, 18, 16, 17
Final exam	30%	0	0	6, 3, 1, 4, 21, 5, 7, 8, 2, 9, 12, 14, 20, 19, 18, 16, 17, 23, 22
PEC	50%	0	0	1, 4, 21, 10, 7, 15, 8, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 19, 18, 16, 17, 24

The assessment will be based on continuous evaluation criteria, which makes attendance mandatory and allows us to measure the degree of specific competencies of the program achieved by the student.

The values of each item for evaluation are listed in the following table. All items must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 in order to be counted toward the evaluation.

Midterm Exam. Total value: 20%.
Exams may be, at the professor's discretion, either oral or written. Written exams may include multiple choice questions, short-answer questions, essay questions, or a combination of these formats. The exam must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 to count toward the continuous evaluation.

PEC (Continuous Evaluation Tests). Five PECs, each worth 10% (0.6% for the written work, 0.4% for the oral presentation). Total value: 50%.
Each PEC must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 to count toward the continuous evaluation. Any PEC found to contain plagiarism, excessive similarity, or improper citation will receive a grade of 0. PECs submitted after the deadline will be graded as "0". PECs may consist of a written assignment or a test on the teaching materials, readings, etc., as specified for each.

Final Exam. Total value: 30%.
Exams may be, at the professor's discretion, either oral or written. Written exams may include multiple choice questions, short-answer questions, essay questions, or a combination of these formats. The exam must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 to count toward the continuous evaluation. If the student does not achieve a 3.5, they will proceed directly to the resit exam.

To be eligible for continuous evaluation, students must take all the assessable tests (PECs, midterm exam, and final exam).
Each of these must be passed with a minimum grade of 3.5 to be included in the continuous evaluation. Failure to take all the assessments or to achieveat least a 3.5 in each will result in the student going directly to the resit exam.

PECs and assignments must be properly cited in accordance with the relevant guidelines.
No work will be accepted without proper citation. Citation Guide

If the student does not pass the course according to the criteria outlined above (continuous evaluation), a resit exam may be taken on the scheduled date.
This exam will cover a summary of the entire course content.

To be eligible for the resit exam, the student must have been previously assessed in a set of activities that together constitute at least two-thirds of the total course grade.
However, the maximum grade that can be recorded in the student’s transcript for the resit exam is 5 (pass).

Students who need to reschedule an assessment date must submit a request using the form available in the EPSI Tutoring Moodle space.

Without prejudice to other appropriate disciplinary actions, and in accordance with current academic regulations:
"In the event that a student commits any irregularity that may significantly affect the grading of an assessment, the act will be graded with a 0, regardless of any disciplinary process that may be initiated. If multiple irregularities occur in assessments for the same subject, the final grade for that subject will be 0."

Tests and exams may be written and/or oral, at the discretion of the instructor.

 

PLAGIARISM:
If there are indications during grading that an activity or assignment contains responses generated with the help of artificial intelligence, the instructor may request a personal interview to verify authorship of the text.

 

Single Assessment:
Students opting for the single assessment will complete a final synthesis test covering all course content (50%) and submit the course assignment (50%).
The date for this test and the assignment submission will coincide with the last scheduled exam for continuous evaluation.
The same resit system as for continuous evaluation will apply.

 

Evaluation of students in a second or subsequent attempt:
Students repeating the course must complete all scheduled tests and exams and submit all required assignments by the indicated Moodle deadlines.

 

Not Assessable (No Show):
If the student has not been assessed on at least two-thirds of the course due to not participating in assessments or submitting assignments, they will receive the grade "Not Assessable" according to EPSI Evaluation Regulations.
This means the student may not take the final resit exam.

 

Resit Exam:
A student who does not pass the course (fails to reach a total of 5 out of 10), according to the criteria described above, may take a final resit exam only if they have been assessed in a set of activities equivalent to at least two-thirds of the total course grade.
If not, they will receive a “Not Presented” grade and will not be eligible for the resit exam.
This exam will re-evaluate the entire course content.
If the exam is passed, the final grade for the course will be a maximum of 5, regardless of the score obtained.

 

Change of Assessment or Exam Date:
Students who need to change the date of an assessment must submit a request using the form found in the EPSI Tutoring Moodle space.
Once completed, the form must be sent to the course instructor and the Degree Coordinator.

 

Review:
To request a review of an assessment, students must email the instructor, who will provide the procedure for review.
The review process will be the same for single-assessment students.

 

USE OF AI
In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools is allowed as an integral part of the development of the assignment, provided that the final results reflect a significant contribution from the student in terms of personal analysis and reflection on the topics covered. The student must identify which parts of the work have been completed using AI and which have not, as well as the name of the AI tool used. Lack of transparency in the use of AI is considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a penalty in the activity grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.