Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Ev 1. What do we want to learn?	15	0	0	KM66, KM67
Ev 2. Intervention workshop	30	0	0	CM26, KM67, SM48, SM49, SM50
Ev 3 . Oral presentation	25	0	0	CM27, KM65, KM66, SM48, SM49
Ev 4. Learners experiences collection	30	0	0	CM26, KM66, KM67, SM48

The competencies of this subject will be evaluated by means of different pieces of evidence to be held in different weeks:

 

Evidence 1. What do we want to learn? 15% (In class, before the 1st evaluation period)

Evidence 2. 30 % intervention plan (In class, before the 2nd evaluation period)

Evidence 3. Oral presentation 25% (In class, before the 2nd evaluation period)

Evidence 4. Learners experiences collection 30% (Second Evaluation Period)

 

Evidence Code	Denomination	Weight	Format (oral, written or both)	Authorship (individual, group or both)	1. Via (face-to-face, virtual or both) 2. Feed-back	EV duration
EV1	Whats do we want to learn?	15	both	group	1. both 2. both, at week 6	It starts at week 1 and ends at week 5 with theexhibition. It is compulsory to go to the exhibition
EV2	Intervention workshop	30	both	both	1. both 2. both, at week 19	It starts at week 5 and ends at week 16
EV3	Oral presentation	25	both	both	1. face to face 2. both, at week 19	It starts at week 12 and ends at week 18 with the exhibition. It is compulsory to go to the exhibition
EV4	Learners experiences collection	30	written	individual	1. virtual 2. virtual,at week 20	It starts at week 1 and ends at week 17

 

ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBJECT

It will be considered that a student has passed the subject if in the set of the 4 pieces of evidence he/she obtains a score equal or superior to 5,0, and at leastin the evidence 4 (learner's experiences collection)  obtains a mark of 3,0. Those students who do NOT present all the evidence will NOT pass the subject, although the total score is equal or superior to 5,0.

Students who have not attended any of the EV4 talks will not be ableto execute or recover the activities proposed in this talk. Ev4 consists of about 3-6 talks.

Once the subject has been passed (grade ≥ 5,0), the final grade can not be improved through works or other activities.

 A student who has presented pieces of evidence of learning with a weight equal to or greater than 4,0 points (40%) will be considered for evaluation.

Students who have not passed the course but in the continuous assessment have obtained a grade of 3.5 or higher but less than 5,0, can present to a new written test of the part not passed. To do this test or exam it is necessary that students have been previously evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which equals a minimum of 2/3 of the total rating of the subject.

This new exam will consist of written questions corresponding to the evidence not approved, and does not serve to improve the final score of the subject if a student has already approved it. The maximum score that can be obtained in the subject in this new exam is 5,0.

No unique final synthesis test for students who enrol for the second time or more is anticipated

 

This subject does not consider single assessment.

THE TRANSLATION OF THE IN-PERSON ASSESSMENT TESTS WILL BE CARRIED OUT IF THE REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 263 ARE MET AND THE REQUEST IS MADE ONLINE (E-FORM) DURING WEEK 4 (more information on the Faculty's website).

 

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches and text proofreading. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency in the use of AI in this graded activity will be considered a breach of academic honesty and may result in a partial or total penalty in the activity’s grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.

 

COPYING OR PLAGIARISM: According to Article 116, Section 10 Regulations UAB, if the student performs any irregularity (copy, plagiarism, impersonation or forgery of the signature on the face-to-face attendance list and/or other dishonest academic conduct...) that could lead to a significant variation of the qualificationof an act of evaluation, will be rated with 0,0 this act of evaluation. If there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final mark will be 0,0.

 

  “N.B. The proposed teaching and assessment methodologies may experience some modifications as a result of the restrictions on face-to-face learning imposed by the health authorities. The teaching staff will use the Moodle classroom or the usual communication channel to specify whether the different directed and assessment activities are to be carried out on-site or online, as instructed by the Faculty ”.