Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

The subject is implemented through face-to-face activities. The attendance to these activities is considered an essential requirement to pass the subject. A minimum attendance of 80% is compulsory for the seminar group sessions. Certificates or evidences presented in case of absence only pojnt out the absence and, in any case, excuse the lack of attendance. In case of non attendance higher than 20%, the student will be able to retake the assessment if he/she has proven 2/3 of the assessment exercises.

The assessment of the subject is continuous and will be carried out throughout the academic year. This subject does not consider the "single assessment" method. To pass the subject you must have passed each of the required evidences:

1. Delivery of a case study and/or intervention project prepared in groups in the Organization section.
2. Techniques and exercises elaborated in groups and individually in the Group section.
3. Individual written tests linked to the content worked in the subject. One for each section. In the event that one or both of them do not have at least 5 points, they will have to do a retake exam for the section/s not passed. It will also be possible to attend for those people who, for health reasons, have not been able to attend to any of the tests on the scheduled dates. Once the retakes have been made, the exams of each section must obtain 5 points, then the average will be calculated. The date of the individual written test of the first section will be 19/1/2026 and the second section will be 8/6/2026. The date of retake of the written exams will be 29/6/2026.

The content, structure, method of presentation and delivery, as well as presentation dates, will be explained at the beginning of each block.

To pass the course all piece of evidence must have a minimum grade of 5 points on a scale of 10. In the table included below, you can see the specific weight that has each evidence. The student who does not present one or more piece ofevidence will be qualified as "not assessed". In the event of a part of the subject not being passed after making up the assessments, the final grade that will appear on the academic record will be the one that has not been passed.

Lecturers will return the feedback related to case study and/or project, the techniques and exercises in continuous evaluation and the writing exams within 20 days. The group work willbe returned at the end of each block. The grades of each evidence will be made public in the Moodle Classroom. The student who wants to revise the grade will haveto do it during the period established by the lecturers.

Students who during the course have made a proper follow-up of the subject and still have some evidence not passed can be allowed to redo the activity. Lecturers will study each case according to their situation.

Students enrolled for a second time and so on can ask to make only a final synthesis test. Lecturers will announce the conditions on the first day of the subject (15/9/2025). This option must be communicated, agreed, and formalized with the lecturers during the first month of the course. The option of the synthesis test does not in any case mean exemption from carrying out all the evaluation evidence of the subject.

In all activities, students must respect the linguistic correction, the writing, and the formal aspects of the presentation. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity can be returned (not evaluated) or not pass if the lecturer considers that it does not meet these requirements. Before submitting evidence, students must verify that they respect these criteria and that the sources, notes, textual citations, and bibliographic references, follow the APA regulations, according to the documentation summarized in the following sources https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/guibib/113512/modelapa_a2021a.pdf and http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_03.html

Copying or plagiarizing material, both in the case of papers and written tests, will be punished; the subjectwill be automatically considered failed. A work, activity or written test will be considered "copied" when it reproduces in whole or in part thework of a colleague, and that it is "plagiarized" when a part of an author's text is presented as his own without citing the source. In case of detecting any of the two practices, the lecturers will study if it is convenient to request the opening of a disciplinary enquiry. You can find more information about plagiarism at http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks such as text correction (spelling, grammar, clarity, etc.), image or diagram generation, content synthesis or brainstorming. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in any assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a total penalty in the grade of the activity. The teaching staff, in case of doubts, may require a tutorial to validate the authorship.

Likewise, this subject requires to show an attitude compatible with the educational profession: punctuality, proper use of electronic devices (mobile, computer, etc.), empathy, correctness in communication with others, and respect to the diversity and plurality of ideas, people and situations.