Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Political Science and Public Management | OT | 3 |
Political Science and Public Management | OT | 4 |
Contemporary History, Politics and Economics | OT | 3 |
Contemporary History, Politics and Economics | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Students are expected to bring a strong motivation and interest in topics such as institutional design, multilevel governance, public policy, and comparative politics. While the Spanish case will be one of the reference points, the course adopts a broader comparative perspective that draws on multiple political systems and international frameworks.
Multilevel government is a defining feature of contemporary political systems, as authority and decision-making are increasingly distributed across multiple levels—local, regional, national, and supranational. Understanding how these levels interact, and how power is coordinated, shared, or contested among them, is essential for comprehending the functioning of modern democracies.
The term multilevel government refers to the political and institutional interaction between different levels of authority within compound or territorially complex systems. This course explores the principles, structures, and real-world dynamics of multilevel governance from a comparative perspective.
The course is organized into four interrelated thematic blocks:
Block I lays the analytical and conceptual groundwork, introducing key distinctions between federalism, decentralization, and other models of territorial governance. It also explores how these systems are classified, measured, and debated in international contexts.
Block II examines the political and institutional dynamics of multilevel governance, focusing on issues such as intergovernmental coordination, accountability, and the political challenges of managing complex territorial arrangements.
Block III applies these concepts through comparative analysis of national experiences. Special attention is given to Spain, due toits distinctive and often contested model of decentralization, studied in comparison with other cases such as Canada, Belgium, India, and South Africa. This block explores both institutional design and practical implementation.
Block IV addresses cross-cutting and emerging challenges in multilevel governance, including the management of policy areas such as migration, climate change, and linguistic diversity, as well as the role of supranational and international actors like the European Union, the United Nations, and regional organizations.
The course aims to equip students with both a robust theoretical foundation and the analytical tools needed to critically assess how multilevel governance functions across diverse political systems. While Spain serves as a key case study, it is examined within a broader comparative and thematic framework.
Special emphasis is placed on the actual functioning of intergovernmental mechanisms, the distribution of competences, and the patterns of cooperation and conflict. The goal is to provide students with the tools to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and evolving dynamics of multilevel governance—not only in Spain, but in a variety of domestic and international contexts.
Ultimately, the course seeks to bridge conceptual understanding with empirical insight, offering a dual perspective that combines academic analysis with the practical concerns of policymakers and institutional actors.
The course is structured into four main thematic blocks, combining theoretical sessions with practical seminars. The theoretical sessions introduce the analytical tools and core concepts of multilevel governance, while the practical sessions include case discussions, debates, and reading-based activities designed to encourage participation and critical thinking.
🟦 Block I – Foundations of Multilevel Government
This block introduces the basic concepts, institutional types, and analytical frameworks used to study multilevel governance. Topics include federalism, decentralization, compound states, and the tools used to measure and compare them.
Includes:
Practical sessions may involve case comparisons or guided discussion of selected readings.
🟨 Block II – Dynamics and Tensions in Multilevel Systems
This block explores the internal functioning of multilevel systems, focusing on how different levels of government interact, cooperate, or compete. It also addresses political representation, legitimacy, and accountability challenges.
Includes:
Seminars may include comparative analysis, debate, or text-based discussion.
🟩 Block III – Comparative Cases andNational Experiences
This block applies the conceptual tools to different national cases, with a comparative perspective. The Spanish case is a central example, but other cases (e.g. Canada, Belgium, India) are also considered to explore patterns, differences, and shared challenges.
Includes:
Practical sessions may focus on comparing specific cases or exploring thematic issues such as language or territorial crises.
🟪 Block IV – Emerging Issues and Supranational Multilevel Governance
This final block explores how multilevel governance interacts with global and cross-cutting challenges, including migration, climate policy, and cultural diversity. It also considers how multilevel structures operate at the supranational level, particularly in the EU and other international frameworks.
Includes:
Seminars may include policy simulations, thematic comparisons, or discussion of selected cases or materials.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Autonomous | 75 | 3 | 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Directed | 50 | 2 | 2, 4, 5 |
Supervised | 12 | 0.48 | 3 |
Throughout the course, each thematic block will combine traditional lectures—delivered by the instructor or invited experts—with interactive sessions based on case studies, presentations, debates, short reading assessments, or brief analytical essays. These sessions are designed to encourage students to apply theoretical frameworks to specific cases and to engage in comparative and critical discussion.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam Essay | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Seminar Activities | 30% | 7 | 0.28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
2 parcial tests | 20% | 4 | 0.16 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Assessment Continuous Assessment
Student performance will be evaluated through three complementary components, aimed at ensuring ongoing engagement with the course:
This combination ensures that students are assessed continuously throughout the semester. To obtain a final grade, students must complete all three types of assessments: seminar work, partial tests, and the final exam.
Weighting of components:
Students who fail the continuous assessment may opt for a compensatory exam.
Final Assessment Option
Students who choose not to follow the continuous assessment path must complete two compulsory tasks:
Both components are mandatory and must be passed in order to obtain a final grade.
Non Evaluable Students:
Students will receive a Not Assessed (NA) grade if they fail to complete at least one of the three assessment components (seminar activities, midterm tests, or final exam) in the case of continuous assessment, or if they do not submit either of the two required tasks (final exam and long essay) in the case of final assessment.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed strictly for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translations, as well as for certain seminar activities when explicitly indicated. Students must clearly identify which parts were generated using AI, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced both the process and the final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding AI use in any assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty on the grade, or more severe academic sanctions in serious cases.
It will be determined at the beginning of the term at CV.
Basic text:
Kincaid, J., & Leckrone, J. (Eds.). (2023). Teaching federalism: Multidimensional approaches (Elgar Guides to Teaching). Edward Elgar Publishing.
..
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | English | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 1 | English | second semester | afternoon |