Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

A. General module evaluation standards
										
											
										
											This module is structured into different parts that are taught by different teachers. The final grade of the module consists of the average of the grades of each subject or parts that make up the module.
										
											
										
											The module is considered to have been approved if:
										
											1- the grade for each part of the module is greater than or equal to 4.5 (on a scale from 0 to 10) and
										
											2- the final grade of the module is greater than or equal to 4.5 (on a scale of 0 to 10)
										
											
										
											If the module is not approved, the master's coordination will offer the student the possibility of re-evaluating the parts that make up the module and that have not been passed if the grade is greater than or equal to 3.5, according to the professors' assessment. of the modules and coordination. If the student passes the reevaluation, the maximum grade he or she will obtain in the reevaluated part will be 5. The reevaluation schedule will be made public along with the list of module grades.
										
											
										
											The student will have a grade of Not Evaluated if he does not attend at least 80% of the face-to-face classes (a control will be kept with a signature sheet) or if he does not carry out at least 50% of the continuous evaluation activities. Each teacher will specify in this guide the way in which they will evaluate the students. If not specified in the guide, these evaluation standards will be delivered on the first day of class in writing.
										
											
										
											Specifically, the evaluation of the module is based on the following criteria:
										
											
										
											    - Attendance (20%): This criterion is configured with the control of attendance and participation in the face-to-face sessions corresponding to the four parts (A,B,C and D) that make up the module.
										
											
										
											    - Individual exercises (20%): This criterionis configured with the tests proposed by each teacher in their part (A, B, C or D) in a uniform manner.
										
											
										
											    - Practical or group exercises (60%): This criterion is configured with the tests proposed by each teacher in their part (A, B, C or D) in a uniform manner.

B. Calendar of evaluation activities
										
											
										
											The dates of the different evaluation tests (midterm exams, classroom exercises, delivery of assignments,...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.
										
											
										
											The date of the final exam of the subject is scheduled in the Faculty's exam calendar.
										
											"The programming of the evaluation tests cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation cannot be carried out. In this case, the people responsible for the degrees, after consulting the teaching staff and to the affected students, they will propose a new programming within the corresponding school period." Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (UAB Academic Regulations)

Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business who, in accordance with the previous paragraph, need to change an evaluation date must submit the request by filling out the Test Rescheduling Request document at the following link: https://eformularis.uab.cat/ group/deganat_feie/test-rescheduling-request
										
											
										
											Grade Review Procedure
										
											
										
											Coinciding with the final exam, the day and means in which the final grades will be published will be announced. In the same way, the procedure, place, date and time of the exam review will be informed in accordance with the University regulations.Recovery Process
										
											
										
											"To participate in the recovery process, students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities that represents a minimum of two thirds of the total grade for the subject or module." Section 3 of Article 112 ter. Recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Students must have obtained an average grade for the subject between 3.5 and 4.9.
										
											
										
											The date of this test will be scheduled in the Faculty's exam calendar. The student who appears and passes it will pass the subject with a grade of 5. Otherwise, the same grade will be maintained.
										
											Irregularities in evaluation acts
										
											
										
											Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that may be deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the event that the student makes any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, it will be graded with a 0." this evaluation act, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instituted. In the event that various irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0". Section 10 of Article 116. Evaluation results. (UAB Academic Regulations)