Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4314828 Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Prerequisites are not required
This optional module, increases the knowledge acquired in the spatial analysis module of the same master, focusing on the exploitation of geographic databases from the SQL language, as well as in specific practical cases. In addition, it adds concepts associated with the publication of cartography on the Internet taking into account international standards for data and metadata that allow interoperability including semantic, technologic, information, etc.
At the end of the course, the student will be able to:
1. Use different cartography publication tools on the Internet.
2. Know the advantages and limitations of the use of standards in the GIS world.
3. Apply international standards to the edition and publication of data and metadata on the Internet.
4. Master queries in databases using SQL language.
5. Design appropriately information systems for the use of data in a scientific, professional or informative context.
RELATIONAL DATABASES. SQL
Theory and exercises:
Practical case:
CASE STUDIES IN GIS IMPLEMENTATIONS
Contents based on a series of conferences by representatives of different public and/or private organizations that explain the design and use of the GIS in their work environments
STANDARDS FOR DISTRIBUTED GEOSERVICES
1. Introduction
1.1 Interoperability and IDES
1.2 Standardization organizations
1.3 UML and XML
Exercise 1: Introduction to XML and XML Schema (Enterprise Architech XMLValidator Buddy)
2. Metadata standards
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Dublin Core
2.3FGDC
2.4 ISO (19115, 19139)
2.5 IDEC profile
2.6 Profile NEM
2.7 INSPIRE profile
2.8 Metadata management applications
Exercise 2: Metadata documentation
3. Format standards
3.1 Modeling of data: UML and GML
Exercise 3: Introduction to GML, generation schemes from UML
3.2 Other format standards (SHP, MMZx, KML, GeoJSON, SWE Common, WaterML, ...)
Exercise 4: Google Earth, Google Maps and KML
4. GEOSERVICES STANDARDS
4.1 Catalog services: CSW
4.2 Display services: WMS, WMTS, OWS Context
4.3 Download service: WCS, WFS, SOS
4.4 Processing service: WPS
Exercise 5: Connection with external WMS servers.
PUBLISHING CARTOGRAPHY ON THE INTERNET
1. Introduction
1.1 Protocols
1.1.1 Layers of protocol
1.1.2 Client server architecture
1.1.3 Most commonly used protocol layers
1.2 Technological evolution of distributed GIS
1.2.1 Static maps (theory for exercise 0)
1.2.2 Static webpages (theory for exercise 1)
1.2.3 Interactive web maps (theory for exercise 2)
1.2.3.a Accelerated JavaScript and JSON
1.2.4 Geoservices distributed
1.3 Nearby technological examples
2. ISO and OGC standards
2.1 Introduction to WxS or OWS
2.2 Services for the evaluation of information
2.2.1 Review of the Web Map Service (theory for exercises 3, 4, 5)
2.2.2 Use of several WMS clients
2.3 Services in the cloud (exercise 6)
3. Practice
3.1 Introduction to IIS
3.2 Static map publication
3.3 Dynamic map publication
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes / exhibitions | 49 | 1.96 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Classroom practices | 60 | 2.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Tutorials | 4 | 0.16 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study | 21 | 0.84 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Preparation of works | 90 | 3.6 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Reading of articles / reports of interest | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Principal working language: spanish (spa), although the bibliographic materials may be in other languages, mostly English.
In this module there are 3 groups of learning activities:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Writing reports | 100 | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
This subject/module does not incorporate single assessment
The evaluation of this subject consists of the following system:
Aspects to take into account.
Extraordinary exams.
Cheating: Copies and plagiarisms.
By copies, we refer to the evidence that the work, project, exam, etc has been partially or totally created/answered without the intellectual contribution of the author. In this definition, we also include the proven attempt to copy in the exams and delivered works and projects and the violation of the laws that assure intellectual authorship. Plagiarisms refer to the works and texts from other authors that someone pretends to be his/her own creation. It is a crime against intellectual property. In order to avoid committing plagiarism, quote all the sources that you use when writing the report of a project. According to UAB’s law, copies and plagiarisms or any other attempt to alter the results of one’s own evaluation or someone else’s ‑allowing to copy, for example‑ implies a result in the corresponding part (theory, problems or practical tasks) of a 0 and, in this case, the student will fail the subject. This does not limit the right to take academic and legal actions against those who have participated. See UAB documentation about copies and plagiarisms http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html
Open Web Mapping Course. Author: Dr. Ian Turton, Senior Research Associate, GeoVISTA Center; Graduate Faculty member, Master of GIS Program. © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University. https://courseware.e-education.psu.edu/courses/geog585/content/home.html
Peng, Zhong-Ren and Ming-Hsiang Tsou (2003) Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks. Wiley. 679p.
Mitchell T, (2005) Web Mapping Illustrated. Using Open Source GIS Toolkits. O'Reilly. 349 p.
Scharl A. and Tochtermann K (2007) The Geospatial Web: How Geobrowsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 are Shaping the Network Society (Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing) Springer 282p.
Galdos System Inc (2003). Developing and Managing GML Application Schemas. A Best Practice Guide. TR2003-232-01. Editor: David S. Burggraf, http://www.geoconnections.org/developersCorner/devCorner_devNetwork/components/GML_bpv1.3_E.pdf.
Gutiérrez Martínez, J. M., F. Palacios, J.A. Gutiérrez de Mesa (2003). El estándard XML y sus tecnologías asociadas. Danysoft. 506 pp.
Kresse, W. i K. Fadaie (2004). ISO Standards for Geographic Information. Ed. Springer. 322 pp.
Lake, R., D. Burggraf, M. Trninic, L. Rae (2004). Geography Mark-Up Language: Foundation for the Geo-Web. John Wiley & Sons. 406 pp.
Nogueras-Iso, J., F.J. Zarazaga-Soria i P.R. Muro-Medrano (2005). Geographic Information Metadata for Spatial Data Infrastructures: Resources, Interoperability and Information Retrieval. Ed. Springer. 264 pp.
Standards Guide ISO/TC211 Geographic Information/Geomatics http://www.isotc211.org/Outreach/ISO_TC%20_211_Standards_Guide.pdf
OGC Reference Model (ORM) http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/orm
Federal Geographic Data Committee (1998). Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata. CSDGM Version 2: FGDC-STD-001-1998. Washington.
International Organization for Standardization (2003): International Standard: Geographic information – Metadata. ISO 19115:2003. Technical Committee 211
International Organization for Standardization (2007): International Standard: Geographic information – Metadata XML Schema Implementation. ISO 19139:2007. Technical Committee 211
Subgrupo de Trabajo del Núcleo Español de Metadatos (2005): Núcleo Español de Metadatos (NEM v1.0). SGTNEM200501. http://www.idee.es/resources/recomendacionesCSG/NEM.pdf
IDEC (2002), Estàndard ISO/TC 211 DIS 19115 – Metadades -- Esquema IDEC. http://www.geoportal-idec.net/geoportal/cat/docs/perfilidec.pdf
W3C Recommendation (2006), XML Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition). http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816
W3C Recommendation (2006), Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition). http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816
W3C Recommendation (2004), XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-0-20041028
W3C Recommendation (2004), XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028
W3C Recommendation (2004), XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028
OpenGIS® Geography Markup Language (GML) Encoding Specification v.3.2.1 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20509
GML 3.1.1 simple features profile v.1.0.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=15201
OGC KML v.2.2.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27810
OpenGIS® Web Service (OWS) Common v.2.0.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=38867
OpenGIS® Web Map Service (WMS) Implementation Specification v.1.3.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=4756
OpenGIS® Web Coverage Service (WCS) Implementation Specification v.1.1.2 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27297
OpenGIS® Web Feature Service (WFS) Implementation Specification v.1.1.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=8339
OpenGIS® Web Map Tile Service (WMTS) Standard v.1.0.0 http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=35326
MiraMon, ArcGIS, QGIS, MiraBosc, Enterprise Architech, XML Validator, GeoServer, MiraMonMapServer, Office Microsoft
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |