Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313382 Advanced Studies in Catalan Language and Literature | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Those required for the master program.
This module analyses the linguistic bases and criteria governing the fixing of oral and written standards. The relationship is also studied between the grammatical description conceived as a system of linguistic competence and production and prescriptive grammar.
References
Cabré Monné, Teresa. 1993. Estructura gramatical i lexicó: el mot mínim català. Tesi doctoral. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Cabré, Teresa. 2002. Altres sistemes de formació de mots. Dins: Solà, Joan; Lloret, Maria Rosa; Mascaró, Joan; Pérez Saldanya, Manuel (dir), Gramàtica del català contemporani. cap. 9. Barcelona: Empúries. 889–932.
Cabré, T. (2009) "Els sistema vocàlic del català central i l'adaptació de manlleus" Actes del XIV Col·loqui Internacionsl de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes, vol. 3: 111-120. Budapest 2006.
Cabré, T. Torres-Tamarit, F.J., Vanrell M.M. 2021 Hypocoristic truncation in Sardinian. Linguistics, 59.3: 683-714. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0061
Mascaró, J. (2011) "Efectes accentuals i sil·làbics sobre la distribució de les vocals mitjanes en català central" M-R. Lloret i C. Pons (eds) Noves aproximacions a la fonologia i la morfologia del català. Symposia Philologica, 21: 405-426. Alacant: IIFV.
McCarthy, John J.; Prince, Alan. 1993b. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series 14. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
McCarthy, John J.; Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill N. Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk & Laura Walsh Dickey (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 249–384. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.
McCarthy, John J.; Prince, Alan. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. A: René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody-morphology interface, 218–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pescarini, Diego. 2007. Types of syncretism in the clitic systems of Romance. Anuario del Seminario Julio Urquijo. ASJU, XLI.2: 285–300.
Pescarini, Diego. 2014. The evolution of Italo-Romance clitic clusters. Prosodic restructuring andmorphological opacity. In P. Beninc., A. Ledgeway & N.Vincent (eds.) Diachrony and dialects. Grammatical change in dialects of Italy. pp. 155–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0008
Bloc 2.1 Pronominal issues (Gemma Rigau)
1.1 Possession expressed by pronouns
1.1.1 The pronoun "en"
1.1.2 Genitive pronouns
1.1.3 Dative pronouns
1.1.4 Elliptical anaphora
1.2 The partitive pronoun "en": special cases
1.2.1 The pronoun "en" in constructions with pure intransitive verbs
1.2.2 The pronoun "en" in constructions with temporal measure phrases
BLOCK 2.2 Phenomena of diachronic syntactic analysis of Catalan. Case studies of grammaticalization and reanalysis (Anna Bartra)
1.1. Determiners
1.1.1. The definite article and the indefinite article
1.1.2. Use of articles in Old Catalan
1.1.3. Restructuring within the noun phrase
1.2. Grammaticalization and impersonal structures
1.2.1. Hom
1.2.2. Reflexive, impersonal, and passive structures. Se.
References
Bartra, Anna & M. Carme Picallo (2011). “¿Puede haber competencia entre gramáticas en la mente de los hablantes?”, dins Escandell Visal, Maria Victoria, Manuel Leonetti i Cristina Sánchez Lópex (eds.), 60 problemas de gramática, dedicados a Ignacio Bosque. Madrid, Akal, p. 176-182.
Company Company, Concepción (dir.) (2010) Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Segunda parte: la frase nominal, 2 vols. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
D'Alessandro, R. (2002). “Agreement in Italian impersonal si constructions: A derivational analysis, Revista da ABRALIN, vol1, nº1, p.35-72.
D'Alessandro, R., & Alexiadou, A. (2002). Inclusive and exclusive impersonal pronouns: A feature-geometrical analysis. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, vol. 27 (2002), p. 31-44.
http://157.138.8.12/jspui/bitstream/11707/371/3/D%27Alessandro%20-%20Alexiadou.pdf
D'Alessandro, R. (2008). Impersonal" si" constructions. De Gruyter Mouton.
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Artemis Alexiadou (2006), “The syntax of the indefinite pronoun nome”, Probus,18: 189-218.
Egerland, Verner (2010), “On Old Italian uomo and indefinite expressions”,in D’Alessandro, Roberta; Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (ed.) Syntactic Variation. The dialects of Italy, Cambridge, CUP, 71-85.
Egerland, V. (2018). First Person Readings of MAN: On semantic and pragmatic restrictions on an impersonal pronoun. In Sheehan & Bailey, eds. Order and structure in syntax II, 179.
Giusti, Giuliana (2001). “The birth of a functional category. From Latin ILLE to the Romance article and personal pronoun” in Cinque G., Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam, Elsevier (ISBN 9780080438740).
Institut d’Estudis Catalans. 2016. Gramàtica de la Llengua Catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans. https://giec.iec.cat/
Jané, Albert (1998). “Sobre l’ús impersonal del pronom es”, Llengua Nacional, 23. https://taller.iec.cat/filologica/documents/ajr/JaneA1998-2_SobreLUsImpersonalDelPronomEs.pdf
MacDonald, Jonathan (2017). “An Implicit Projected Argument in Spanish Impersonal- and Passive-Se Constructions, Syntax, 20.4: 353-383.
Mendikoetxea, A. (1999a). “Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas”, dins Bosque, I. & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 2: 1575-1629.
Mendikoetxea, A. (1999b). “Construcciones con se: medias, pasivas e impersonales”, dins Bosque, I. & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 2: 1631-1722.
Par, Anfós (1923). Sintaxi catalana segons los escrits en prosa de Bernat Metge, Halle, Max Niemeyer. [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für RomanischePhilologie]. Disponible a https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k24867t.texteImage
Ricós Vidal, Amparo (2002), “Construcciones impersonales en el español medieval y clásico: estructuras con omne, se y uno”, Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española. M.T. Echenique, y J. Méndez (eds.), Madrid, Gredos: 945-958.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou (2003). Syntactic Change. A MInimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BLOCK 3. Research on Ambiguity (Jordi Fortuny)
3.1 General aspects
3.1.1 Definition and basic examples
3.1.2 Ambiguity and vagueness
3.1.3 Ambiguity and vagueness as problems
3.1.4 Solutions
3.2 Analysis
3.2.1 Morpholexical phenomena
3.2.1.1 Polysemy
3.2.1.2 Homonymy
3.2.1.3 Syncretism
3.2.2 Syntactic phenomena
3.2.2.1 Constituent ambiguity
3.2.2.2 Transfer ambiguity
3.2.2.3 Constituent ambiguity and prosody
3.2.2.4 Ambiguity and coordination
3.3 Codification
3.3.1 The treatment of ambiguity in the GIEC
3.3.2 Constituent ambiguity and punctuation: the Ortotipografia by Pujol & Solà (1995)
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Participation and debates in classs | 50 | 2 | 1, 2, 7, 8, 11 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervision and coaching | 70 | 2.8 | 3, 4, 5 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
reading assignments, writing assignments and study | 120 | 4.8 | 5, 7, 8, 11 |
Lectures, exercises, debates, practical activities and personal study.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activity of part 1 | 25% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Activity of part 2 | 25% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Activity of part 3 | 25% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Activity of part 4 | 25% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Each part of the module will be assessed by means of one or two activities. When two activities are submitted, none of them will represent more than 50% of the final mark. Each bloc corresponds to the 25% of the final score.
Previous evaluation of a set of activities equivalent to two thirds of the total value of the assignments is required to opt for a recovery exam. The student will be able to access to a recovery exam of the whole module only when his/her final score is between 3,5 and inferior to 5. The recovery exam will consist in an activity for each part of the module.
On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.
Students will obtain a Not assessed course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Single assessment: students who wish to take the single assessment must carry out four activities at the end of the year that will correspond to the four scheduled blocks
See the Contents section in the Catalan version.
None.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |