Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4311312 Management, Organization and Business Economics | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Students should be familiarized with basic instruments of microeconomics, such as preferences, risk aversion and expected utility, technology and equilibrium analysis. Basic real analysis and algebra are instruments used in the entire module.
This module includes several topics related to the economic analysis of the internal organization of the firm. The organization and development of the module will take into account the main learning objective of providing students with relevant economic theory to perform applied research in different fields of management.
The theories are built on economic analysis of transactions and production and focused on the design of contracts, the way that persons organize such transactions. The contract is the result of a negotiation process among the affected parties. Games and behavioral economics provide the instruments for analyzing these processes. The module analyzes repeated and non repeated games under different information situations as well as non-cooperative and cooperative games. We aslo discuss experiments in economics and behavioral economics, stressing the differences in behavior with respect to theory and also gender differences. We make special emphasis on the applications of cooperative games to the contract design. The module also analyzes how external constrains (laws and state regulation) affect the design of such contracts.
The module emphasizes the application of the theories studied in the analyses of the human resources policies of the firms, with emphasis in firm policies regarding recruiting, training, incentives and career concens. Empirical evidence on gender discrimination and wage gaps will be discussed. Other potential applications (industrial organization, corporate finance…) are also discussed.
Furthermore, this module provides a theoretical and empirical overview of the economics of the performance measurement topic, with special focus on the most recent advances and the main areas of research in the field. Based on the fundamentals of the economic theory of production, the lectures introduce and apply alternative approaches to performance and financial performance measurement.
The module presents the main economic theories on the design of contracts.
Three main blocks can be distinguished. Game theory will buid the instruments used in the design of contracts. Special emphasis will be taken on cooperative game theory (Economics of contracts) and applications to the human resoures management (Human resources). Below are some of the main points analyzed during the module.
A detailed description of their contents can be found: http://www.mmobe.uab.cat/en/
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures, discussions and case presentations | 175 | 7 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Training and monitoring of work in progress and cases | 50 | 2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading related cases and practical preparation and problem sets. | 110 | 4.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
The module combines theoretical lectures and practical sessions that require the dynamic participation of students. Learning activities include: following lectures on
main topics, making of problems and computer exercises, reading and critical reviewing of papers. This is an interactive module. Case preparations and in-class
discussions will form the important benchmarks of progress. In-class discussions give students an opportunity to apply material from the class to real-world problems. Other class sessions will be primarily dedicated to lecture material and shorter discussions
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assignments | 40 | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
Content exams | 50 | 15 | 0.6 | 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
Paper discussions | 10 | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
The module assessment will consist of:
- Assignments (resolution of problems, case studies). Even if cooperation is valuable, all problem set must contain only individual answers to the problems.
- Paper discussions
- Exams
This subject/module can not be evaluated by the means of a single assessment.
Attending the sessions is a requirement.
The module is passed when the final mark is equal or higher than five.
Addison, J.T., P. Teixeira and T. Zwick (2010): “German works councils and the anatomy of wages”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(2), 247-270.
Baker, George, Robert Gibbons, and Kevin J. Murphy. 1994. "Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts." Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:1125-56.
Baker, George. 1992. "Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement." Journal of Political Economy 100:598-614.
Baron, J. & Kreps D. (1999) Strategic Human Resources Frameworks for Managers. New York: Wiley.
Benson, J., and M. Brown (2009): “Employee voice: does union membership matter?”, Human Resource Management Journal, 20 (1), 80-99.
Bidwell, M. (2011): “Paying more to get less: the effects of external hiring versus internal mobility”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 369-407.
Blaug M. 1976. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, September, p.827-55.
Bolton, Patrick and M. Dewatripont. 2005. “Contract Theory.” Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brandemburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1996. Coopetition. Harvard University Press.
Bull, Clive. 1987. "The Existence of Self-Enforcing Implicit Contracts." Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:147-59.
Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton. University Press.
Camerer,C. and Malmendier, U. 2007. Behavioral Economics of Organizations. Manuscript.
Collins, C.J. and Smith, K.G. (2006): “Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms”, Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
Demougin, Dominique & Fluet, Claude, 2001. "Monitoring versus incentives," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1741-1764, October.
Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean (1991), Game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978‐0‐262‐06141‐4.
Ghatak, M. Contracts and Organizations, unpublished lecture notes, LSE
Gibbons, R., Roberts, J. (Eds.) (2012), Handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton,
Gibbons, R.; Waldman M. 2006. Enriching a Theory of Wage and Promotion Dynamics inside Firms. Journal of Labor Economics, v. 24, 1, 59-107.
Gibbons, Robert D. (1992), Game theory for applied economists, Princeton University Press, ISBN978‐0‐691‐00395‐5 . * Published in Europe as Robert Gibbons (2001), A Primer in Game Theory,
Green, Jerry R.; Mas‐Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael D. (1995), Microeconomic theory, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐19‐507340‐9.
Gutiérrez, O. and V. Salas (2008): “Performance Standards and Optimal Contracts”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 139-152.
Haeck, C., and F. Verboven (2011): “The internal economics of a university: evidence from personnel data”, Journal of Labor Economics, 30(3), 591-626.
Hart, Oliver and Bengt Holmstrom. 1987. "The Theory of Contracts." In T. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hart, Oliver. 1995. "Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure". Oxford University Press. Chapters 1, 2 and 3.
Hemmer, T., O. Kim and R. Verrecchia (2000): “Introducing Convexity into Optimal Compensation Contracts”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 307-327.
Holmstrom, B. (1979): “Moral Hazard and Observability”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom. 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7:24-52.
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. "Managerial Incentive Problems--A Dynamic Perspective." Republished in Review of Economic Studies 66 (1999): 169-82.
Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. and Prennushi, G. (1997): “The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: a study of steel finishinglines”, American Economic Review, 87(3), 291-313.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., Hu, J. and Baer, J.C. (2012): “How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms”, Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques and David Martimort. 2002. “The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lazear E. P. 1995. Personnel Economics. The Wicksell Lectures, Introduction, 1-11.
Lazear E. P. 2000. The Future of Personnel Economics. The Economic Journal, 110, November, F611-639.
Lazear, E. (1998) Personnel Economics for Managers. New York: Wiley.
Lazear, E.; Gibbs M. (2009) Personnel Economics in Practice. Second Edition. New York: Wiley.
Lazear, E.P., and P. Oyer (2004): “Internal and external labour markets: a personnel economics approach”, Labour Economics, 11(5), 527-554.
Lepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1999): “The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31- 48.
London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, ISBN 978‐0‐7450‐1159‐2 .
Long, R., and J. Shields (2009): “Do unions affect pay methods of Canadian firms? A longitudinal study”, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 64 (3), 422-465.
Machin, S., and S.Wood (2005): “Human Resource Management as a substitute for trade unions in British workplaces”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58 (2), 201-218.
McPhail,R., and R. Fisher (2008): “It’s more than wages: analysis of the impact of internal labour markets on the quality of jobs”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(3), 461-472.
Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992): Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice-Hall (Chapter 7). Gutiérrez, O. (2007): “Linear Contracts as Incentives: A Puzzle”, Spanish Economic Review, 9, 153-158.
Mirrlees, J. ([1975], 1999): “The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour”, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 3-21. Topic 4: Linear incentives. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992): Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice-Hall (Chapter 7). Gutiérrez, O. (2007): “Linear Contracts as Incentives: A Puzzle”, Spanish Economic Review, 9, 153-158. Special Session: Solving the problem set.
Morikawa, M. (2010): “Labor unions and productivity: An empirical analysis using Japanese firm-level data”, Labour Economics, 17 (6), 1030-1037.
Mussa, M. and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.“ Journal of Economic Theory . 301-317. Laffont, Jean-Jacques and David Martimort. 2002. “The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model.” Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 2
Myerson, Roger B. (1991), Game theory: analysis of conflict, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐674‐34116‐6.
Nishii, L.H., Lepak, D.P. and Schneider, B. (2008): “Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and custormerM satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545.
Osborne, Martin J. (2004), An introduction to game theory, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐19‐512895‐6.
Osborne, Martin J.; Rubinstein, Ariel (1994), A course in game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978‐0‐262‐65040‐3.
Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, p. 7-63.
Raju, J. and V. Srinivasan (1996): “Quota-based Compensation Plans for Multiterritory Heterogeneous Salesforces”, Management Science, 42, 1454-1462.
Rasmusen, Eric (2006), Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (4th ed.), Wiley‐Blackwell, ISBN 978‐1‐4051‐3666‐2.
Roth, A. 1995. Introduction to experimental economics. In Kagel, J. and Roth, A., Eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.
Salanie, Bernard. 1997. “The Economics of Contracts: a Primer.” Cambridge: MIT Press. • Salas, Vicente. “Economía de la Empresa”. Ariel.
Sattinger, M. 1993. Assignment models of the distribution of earnings. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 2.
Treble, J., E. van Gameren, S. Bridges, and T. Barmby (2001): “The internal economics of the firm: further evidence from personnel data”, Labour Economics, 8(5), 531-552.
Weiss, A. 1995. Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 133-154.
The program will provide the software if needed.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PLABm) Practical laboratories (master) | 30 | English | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TEm) Theory (master) | 30 | English | second semester | morning-mixed |