Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2504235 Science, Technology and Humanities | FB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The subject does not require to have taken any specific subjects of the degree.
The subject presents a social and cultural history of knowledge, in a broad sense. It addresses the different mechanisms of construction and circulation of knowledge about nature and society, from an interdisciplinary perspective. Through the historical study of institutions, spaces and objects, and their interaction with diverse protagonists, the changing frontiers of knowledge and the mechanisms of construction of authority and cultural hegemony are analyzed. The course offers the student a critical and renewed vision of the modernization processes that have led to the contemporary era.
Introduction: The social and cultural historiography of knowledge.
Oral knowledge: Collective knowledge, tacit skills.
Written knowledge: Laws, manuscripts and intellectuals.
Printed knowledge: Books, language and nomenclature.
The classification of knowledge: Taxonomies and encyclopedias.
Visual knowledge: Spaces, images, landscapes.
Material knowledge: Objects, experiments, observations.
Knowledge as a commodity: Exhibitions, fairs and museums.
The organization of knowledge: Academies, universities and societies.
Useful knowledge: Trade, industry and war.
The geography of knowledge: Centers and peripheries.
Knowledge audiences: Readers, students, amateurs.
The frontiers of knowledge: Experts, professionals and authority.
Digital knowledge: Artificial intelligence and globalization.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Guided learning exercises | 16 | 0.64 | 7, 18, 3 |
theoretical class | 33 | 1.32 | 2, 12 |
Type: Supervised | |||
tutorials | 4.25 | 0.17 | 1, 10, 15 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study | 48 | 1.92 | 11 |
Research and reading. Preparation of exercices | 38.75 | 1.55 | 1, 4, 11, 9, 10, 17, 16, 15 |
Theoretical lectures: Presentation of each theme (aims, contents, related texts).
Practical lectures: Analysis and discussion of the theme's readings.
Personal work: Guided reading of texts, study, elaboration of essays and essay review.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essays (4) | 40% | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 12, 6, 9, 10, 8, 17, 16, 13, 14, 15, 18, 3 |
Test 1 | 30% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 12, 11, 3 |
Test 2 | 30% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 7, 10, 8, 15 |
On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.
There will be a reevaluation exam. Students will obtain a “Not assessed/Not submitted” course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items. To be reevaluated, you must have been evaluated in a set of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject. The exam will be made on the dates specified by the faculty; will not be to improve grade; the maximum rating is 5.0.
Misconduct in assessment activities: In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Single assessment. Title of the evidence: Exam, first part of the course (30%); Exam, Second part of the course exam (30%); Test, lectures (40%).
BERNAL, John D. (1973). Historia social de la ciencia. Edició 3ª ed. Península. Barcelona. (1ª ed. 1954).
BOWLER, Peter J.; MORUS, Iwan Rhys (2007). Panorama general de la ciencia moderna. Crítica. Barcelona.
DEBUS, Allen G. (1985). Hombre y naturaleza en el Renacimiento. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México (1ª ed. 1978).
FARA, Patricia (2009). Breve historia de la ciencia. Ariel. Barcelona
HENRY, John (2002). The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science. Palgrave. New York.
KUHN, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press. Chicago [Trad. cast. KUHN, Thomas S. (2005). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica de México].
LINDBERG, David (2002 [1992]). Los inicios de la ciencia occidental. Barcelona: Paidós. (Traducción de Antonio Beltrán)
NIETO-GALÁN, Agustí (2011). Los públicos de la ciencia. Expertos y profanos a través de la historia. Cátedra.
OLBY, G.N.; CANTOR, J.R.R.; CHRISTIE, M.J.S.; R.C. HODGE (eds.) (1990). Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge. Londres.
OSLER, Margaret J. (ed.) (2000). Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
SERRES, Michel (ed.) (1998). Historia de las ciencias. Cátedra.
PESTRE, Dominique (2008). Ciència, diners i política: assaig d'interpretació. Obrador Edèndum. Santa Coloma de Queralt.
ROSSI, Paolo (1998). El nacimiento de la ciencia moderna en Europa. Crítica. Barcelona.
SOLIS, Carlos; SELLÉS, Manuel (2005). Historia de la Ciencia. Espasa. Madrid.
WESTFALL, Richard S. (1977). The Construction of Modern Science. Cambridge.
Online resource: https://sabersenaccio.iec.cat/
No specific software is required.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |