Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2504216 Contemporary History, Politics and Economics | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Students are assumed to know, at least, the concepts, theories and knowledge covered in the courses 'Political Institutions' (1st year) and 'Public Administration' (2nd year).
Students are assumed to have adequate oral and written skills in English. They are also assumed to regularly read newspapers, blogs, and other regular sources of information.
The course's main objective is that students acquire basic theoretical and empirical knowledge
of the European Union and learn the capacities to use it in the analysis and interpretation of European political processes. The
most specific objectives are: first, learning the historical process of European integration, the evolution and current functioning of
the main political institutions and the inter-institutional relations; secondly, learning the main political dynamics and decisionmaking
processes of the EU through the analysis of some of the most relevant recent political events at European level; third,
getting used to the institutional sources of data on the European Union and learning how to use them to conduct empirical
studies; finally, knowing the main theoretical approaches that currently dominate the field of European studies.
Part 1. Creation of the European Communities and evolution of the European integration process
Topic 1. Historical origins of the European Communities. ECSC, EEC and EURATOM
Topic 2. The Single European Act and the Maastricht Treaty
Topic 3. The Treaty of Amsterdam, the Treaty of Nice, the failed 'Constitutional Treaty'
Topic 4. The Treaty of Lisbon
Part 2. Main institutions and bodies of the European Union
Topic 5. The European Council and the Council of the European Union
Topic 6. The European Commission and the European Parliament
Topic 7. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Central Bank
Part 3. Theories of European integration
Topic 8. Theories of European integration 1
Topic 9. Theories of European integration 2
Topic 10. Theories of European integration 3
Part 4. European policies
Topic 11. The single market
Topic 12. The Monetary Union
Topic 13. The EU budget
Item 14. Agricultural policy
Topic 15. Cohesion policy
Topic 16. Environmental policy
Topic 17. Social policy
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes with ICT support and group discussion | 30 | 1.2 | 5, 14, 15 |
Public presentation of essays | 7.5 | 0.3 | 6 |
Seminars and practical classes | 15 | 0.6 | 6, 7, 13 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutoring | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 6, 10, 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual study | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 14, 15 |
Preparation of team work | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
Reading texts | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 5, 9, 14, 15 |
The methodology of the Institutions and Politics of the European Union combines various training activities designed so that the
student reaches the learning outcomes. These include autonomous, directed and supervised activities. The autonomous
activities include the individual study (30 hours), the reading of texts (30 hours) and the preparation of works in groups (15
hours). The directed activities include master sessions (30 hours), seminars and practical sessions (15 hours), and the public
presentation of essays (7.5 hours). Supervised activities include tutorized follow-up (15 hours).
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mid-term exam | 20% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 5, 9, 14, 15 |
Oral participation in seminars and sessions | 10% | 0.5 | 0.02 | 3, 6, 7 |
Preparation of an essay and oral presentation | 20% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 |
Written exam | 50% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15 |
Continued avaluation
The evaluation of the subject represents approximately 5% of the total hours, equivalent to around 7.5 hours.
The evaluation will consist of the following evidence from the students:
Written examination of knowledge about the subject: 50% of the final mark. Passing the exam is a necessary but not sufficient condition to pass the subject
Mid-term exam: 20% of the grade
Completion and presentation of a group project: 20% of the final mark
Oral participation in seminars and classes: 10% of the final grade
Important considerations:
The exam will take place at the end of the semester. During the first day of the course, the teaching staff will inform the students of the date of the final exam and the deadline for each of the pieces of evidence
The schedule of sessions, activities and reading tests will be made public during the first days of class
The student will receive the grade of "Not assessable" as long as he has not delivered more than 1/3 of the assessment activities.
Students who have failed the final exam with at least a 3.5 will have the opportunity to take the remedial activity. In other words, they will be able to retake the suspended exam on the day determined by the Faculty, having finished the academic period of the second semester. Under no circumstances will students be able to participate in remedial activities to improve their grades. None of the other assessable activities are recoverable
In the make-up exam, the maximum grade assigned will be a 5. The student has presented at least 2/3 of the assessment evidence.
If plagiarism is detected in the submitted work, the sanction will be a failing grade for the subject. In the Virtual Campus you can consult the Guide on How to Cite and How to Avoid Plagiarism
Unique assessment
The single assessment of the subject represents approximately 5% of total hours, equivalent to around 7.5 hours.
The single assessment will consist of the following evidence from the students:
Final exam: 50% of the final grade. Passing the exam is a necessary but not sufficient condition to pass the subject
Mid-term exam: 20% of the final mark
Handing in a work done individually: 30% of the final grade
Important considerations:
All deliveries will be made on the same day at the end of the semester, which will coincide with the day set by the teaching staff for the final exam and which will be made public in sufficient advance.
Students who have not passed the final EXAM will have the opportunity to take the remedial activity. In other words, they will be able to retake the suspended exam on the day determined by the Faculty, having finished the academic period of the second semester. The single assessment resit exam will include the three elements of the single assessment described above.
The student will receive the grade of "Not assessable" as long as he has not delivered more than 1/3 of the assessment activities.
Under no circumstances will students be able to participate in remedial activities to improve their grades. None of the other assessable activities are recoverable.
If plagiarism is detected in the submitted work, the sanction will be a failing grade for the subject. In the Virtual Campus you can consult the Guide on How to Cite and How to Avoid Plagiarism
The maximum grade for the resit exam is 5
Core readings
Bomberg, E., J. Peterson & A. Stubb (eds) (2008), The European Union: How Does it Work?, Oxford University Press.
Michelle Cini & Nieves Perez-Solorzano, European Union Politics, Oxford University Press, pp 157-175.
AGD :: Aplicatiu de Guies Docents v2.1 https://guies.uab.cat/guies_docents/admin/guia.jsp?pas=validacioGuiaDocent&codi_assignatura=10...
12
Dinan, D. (2005), Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner.
Hix, S. & B. Hoyland (2022), El Sistema Político de la Unión Europea. McGraw Hill
Hix, S. & B. Hoyland (2022), The Political System of the European Union.McGraw Hill. https://ebookcentral-proquestcom.
are.uab.cat/lib/uab/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=6992939
Staab, A. (2011), European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact (2nd edition). Indiana University Press.
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.are.uab.cat/lib/UAB/detail.action?docID=731393
Additional readings
Anghel, V. & Erik Jones (2023), 'Is Europe really forged through crisis? Pandemic EU and the Russia – Ukraine war', Journal of
European Public Policy, 30:4, 766-786, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2140820
Ares, C. & L. Bouza García (2019), Política de la Unión Europea. Crisis y continuidad, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones
Sociológicas.
Cini, M. (ed.), (2009), European Union Politics, Oxford University Press.
Dinan, D. (2008), "Fifty Years of European Integration," Fordham International Law Journal, 31/5, pp. 1118-1142.
Genschel, P. (2022), 'Bellicist integration? The war in Ukraine, the European Union and core state powers', Journal of European
Public Policy, 29:12, 1885-1900, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2141823
Giuli, M. & Sebastian Oberthür(2023), 'Third time lucky? Reconciling EU climate and external energy policy during energy
security crises', Journal of European Integration, 45:3, 395-412, DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2190588
Morata, F. (1998), La Unión Europea, Barcelona: Ariel. Caps. 1, 2.
Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe: social purpose and State power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press.
Nelsen, B. & A. Stubb (eds.) (2003), The European Union: readings on the theory and practice of European integration, Palgrave
Macmillan, p. 145-149.
Nugent, N. (2003), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Palgrave Macmillan.
Wallace, H., M. Pollack & A. Young (2010) (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 6th ed
Zestos, G. K., & Benedict, J. M. (2018), European Monetary Integration: A History. Encyclopedia of International Economics and
Global Trade. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George-Zestos/publication
/325070683_European_Monetary_Integration_A_History/links/5d715d79299bf1cb808abaa5/European-Monetary-Integration-
A-History.pdf
Zeitlin, J., F. Nicoli & B. Laffan (2019), 'Introduction: the European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an
age of shifting cleavages', Journal of European Public Policy 26(7): 963-976. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080
/13501763.2019.1619803
Institutional websites:
Portal de la UE: http://europa.eu/
Parlament Europeu: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/public/default_en.htm?redirection
Consell Europeu: http://europa.eu/about-eu/institutions-bodies/european-council/index_es.htm
Consell de la UE: http://consilium.europa.eu/showPage.ASP?lang=es
Comissió Europea: http://ec.europa.eu/index_es.htm
Tribunalde Justícia de la UE: http://europa.eu/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice/index_es.htm
Observatori Legislatiu de la UE: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/home/home.do
Web European Parliament on EU institutions: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/section/187/las-instituciones-y-los-organos-de-la-union-europea
EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=es
Website about the EU:
Politico: https://www.politico.eu/
Eurobserver: http://www.euobserver.com
Eupolitix: http://www.eupolitics.com
Excel
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 50 | English | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 50 | English | second semester | afternoon |