Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2503868 Communication in Organisations | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The student must have the habit of reading the general press, with special attention to national and international political news, as well as opinion articles or the follow-up of debates and television and radio talk shows on political issues understood in a broader sense.
The student must have an acceptable command of the English language, which allows him to understand documents written in that language.
The student must have basic notions of descriptive statistics (understand how to read tables with percentages and frequencies) as well as know how to interpret relationships between variables (double entry tables, typologies, etc ...).
The Catalan and Spanish language is the vehicular tool of written and oral expression of the subject. In this sense, correction in the use of language is an indispensable requirement, especially in the discursive, reasoning and discussion aspects, orthographic and grammatical correction, as well as adequacy, coherence and cohesion.
The subject aims to provide the basic conceptual tools for the analysis and understanding of political communication and its different actors and functions, in contemporary societies and strategic planning of political discourse and analysis of the use of communication in government organizations and public institutions. The role of political communication will be explained, a historical introduction will be given and the main characteristics of political propaganda will be shown, from Nazi and fascist, to Political Marketing 2.0, the concept of Democracy 3.0 or public communication.
1. Power, politics and democracy
2. Marketing and political communication
3. Instruments of political communication
4. Media spectrum, political communication and democracy
The detailed calendar with the content of the different sessions will be exposed the day of presentation of the subject. It will also be posted on the Virtual Campus where students will be able to find a detailed description of the exercises and practices, the different teaching materials and any information necessary for the proper follow-up of the subject.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exercises and practices in class, analysis of practical cases, presentation of works. | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14 |
Master classes, lectures, viewing of audiovisual pieces, presentation of cases. | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 5, 9, 10, 12 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individualized follow-up tutorials and in small groups | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 12, 14 |
Preparation and writing of works | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 14 |
Reading and preparation of texts that will be the subject of seminars | 25 | 1 | 5, 9, 10, 14 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Seminar readings | 40 | 1.6 | 2, 9, 10, 12, 14 |
Study of the syllabus of the subject | 12 | 0.48 | 14 |
This subject is 6 ECTS, which implies a total dedication of the student of 150 hours, distributed in:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Active participation in seminars | 10% | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 |
Dissertation/presentation on an agreed topic or text | 40% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 |
Individual or team work | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 |
Continous evaluation
50% of the grade will correspond to the individual or team course work, conveniently proposed and agreed. It must be prepared and delivered in the last sessions of the course. The work will be presented, debated and defended in class.
The remaining 50% of the grade will correspond to the interventions, assistance during the seminars and presentation of a reading (10%) and to an individual dissertation of a subject or agreed text (40%) on the matter treated during the course.
Students will be entitled to the recovery of the subject if they have been assessed for the set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade of the subject. The activity that is excluded from the recovery process is active participation in seminars.
In the case that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event of several irregularities in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
Single evaluation
50% will correspond to a face-to-face theoretical test. It must be passed (5 or more points out of 10) to pass the course (essential condition). The test will take place during the exam period.
20% will correspond to the resolution of a case study that will be proposed at the beginning of the semester and must be delivered on the date of the face-to-face written test.
30% will correspond to an individual dissertation on an agreed topic or text on the set of readings worked during the course. This dissertation must be defended in class on the day of the written test.
Students will be entitled to the recovery of the subject if they have been assessed for the set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade of the subject.
In the case that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event of several irregularities in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
AI: The use of Artificial Intelligence in this assignment is limited to the evaluation activities related to the course work and the preparation of the oral presentation of the seminar readings. Specifically, AI tools, both textual and visual, can help us generate and outline ideas, contextualize concepts, propose prototypes or combine elements in an innovative or alternative way. In the case of its use, it is necessary to explain and correctly cite its use in the preparation of the work. This involves actively indicating in each section of the activity what tools have been used, the objectives, the prompts that have been incorporated, the response obtained and the process that has been followed to review and edit the response. Remember, also, that if you use generative information, no personal, confidential or intellectual property-protected information should be provided. It should be taken into account that inappropriate use of generative AI, with the lack of review of the response obtained or the lack of citation of the tools used, will be considered irregular conduct in the evaluation that may lead to failure of the activity or the course. evaluation act. If in doubt, consult with the teacher.
Dadamo, Orlando y García Beaudoux, Virginia (2016). Comunicación política: Narración de historias, construcción de relatos políticos y persuasión. Comunicación y Hombre, Núm. 12, pàg. 23-39.
Entman, Robert (1993). Framing: Towards a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), pàg. 51-58.
Gutiérrez-Rubí, Antoni (2014). Tecnopolítica. El uso y la concepción de las nuevas herramientas tecnológicas para la comunicación, la organización y la acción políticas. Barcelona: Bebookness.
Gutiérrez-Rubí, Antoni (2020). ARTivismo. El poder de los lenguajes artísticos para la comunicación política y el activismo. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
Igartua, Juan José y Humanes, María Luisa (2004). Teoría e investigación en comunicación social. Madrid: Síntesis.
Kotler, P.; Kotler, N. (1999). Political Marketing: Generating Effective Candidates, Campaigns, and Causes. A: B. I. Newman (dir.) (1999).
Lakoff, G. (2008). No pensis en un elefant! Llenguatge i debat polític. Viena edicions.
Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key Concepts in Political Communication. Londres: Sage.
Lippmann, W. (2003). La opinión pública. San Lorenzo del Escorial: Cuadernos de Langre.
López García, Guillermo; Gámir Ríos, José y Valera Ordaz, Lidia (2018). Comunicación política: teoría y enfoques. Madrid: Síntesis.
López García, Guillermo y Valera Ordaz, Lidia (eds.) (2017). Pantallas electorales. El discurso de partidos, medios y ciudadanos en la campaña de 2015. Barcelona: UOC.
Macías Rodríguez, Pedro (2018). Esfera públicaydemocracia. Una síntesis de las ideas de Arendt y Habermas. Barcelon: Editorial UOC.
Maarek, Phillipe (1997). Marketing político y comunicación. Técnicas y estrategias para la sociedad de la información. Barcelona: Paidós Comunicación.
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro (2010). La comunicación política. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
McCombs, M. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda: el impacto de los mediosen la opinión pública y en el conocimiento. Barcelona: Paidós.
Meadow, R. G. (1980). Politics as Communication. Nova Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Monzón, C. (1992). Opinión pública y comunicación política. Madrid: Eudema.
Pérez García, David (2003). Técnicas de comunicación política. El lenguaje de los partidos. Madrid: Tecnos.
Puig, Toni (2009). Marca ciudad. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Thompson, J. B. (2001). El escándalo político. Poder y visibilidad en la era de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.
Túñez, Miguel (2012). La gestión de la comunicación en las organizaciones. Sevilla, Salamanca, Zamora: Comunicación Social.
The Virtual Campus platform, word processors, spreadsheets, social platforms and audiovisual.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 71 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 7 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |