Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2502501 Prevention and Integral Safety and Security | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
This subject does not have any prerequierments
The training objectives that are intended to achieve in the subject are the following:
Contents of the theoretical sessions
Contents of practical sessions
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Class | 40 | 1.6 | |
Evaluation | 4 | 0.16 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Continuous evaluation assestments | 12 | 0.48 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Independent study | 94 | 3.76 |
Teaching language: Spanish
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assestment of the oral presentation | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
Assestment of the project | 40% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 |
Exam | 20% | 0 | 0 | 3, 5, 6, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
Individual assestment of the work | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 |
Practical exercices | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 |
The assessment parameters of each one of the aspects considered in the evaluation are the following:
1. Individual Theoretical Exam
The student will have to pass a theoretical examination in order to evaluate the individual knowledge of the basic principles and the contents of the subject, and will be done on the contents explained in class until the time of the test.
The exam will consist of two parts:
PART 1: Test of 10 questions with a correct answer of 4 possible answers.
The criteria for the assessment of the answers will be the following:
1 correct answer: 1 point
1 incorrect answer: - 0,33
Unanswered questions will be evaluated with a 0.
The overall results of the test will correspond to the sum of the assessment of each question. In the case of negative global assessments of the test, they will be rated 0.
PART 2: 5 written answer questions.
Each response will be qualified in a value between 0.0 and 2.0 depending on the content respond to the question posed and the degree of excellence of the response.
The overall results of the test will correspond to the sum of the assessment of each question. In the case of negative global assessments of the test, they will be rated 0.
The overall qualification of the exam will be carried out by the arithmetic mean of the two parts and will be a value of a maximum of 10 points.
2. Individual assessment of the work by the tutor
The tutors of the subject, will assess individually the overall work of each student taking into account the following aspects:
- Participation in class.
- Interest and inquiries for continuous improvement.
- Evolution of the content of the submitted project.
- Respectful attitude towards the development of the class.
- Contributions to the objective of the subject, beyond those strictly proposed.
The qualification of the individual assessment of the work by the tutor will be a value of a maximum of 10.0 points.
3. Individual practice exercises
The student will have to deliver by means of tasks in the moodel classroom the practical exercises that professors create and 2 partial deliveries of the project before the final delivery.
The overall assessment of the set of individual exercises and the partial deliveries of the project will be carried out on a maximum value of 10.0 and a minimum of 0.0.
It will be necessary for the student to deliver, respecting the established deadlines, of all the exercises and partial project deliveries raised so that they can choose to achieve a minimum score of 5 points.
On the other hand, the quality in the elaboration of the exercises (complete content and appropriate to the proposed task in the established terms) will be assessed.
The overall qualification of the individual exercises will be worth about a maximum of 10 points.
4. Evaluation of the submitted project
The students must present in groups of 4 people maximum, a project of security and prevention in logistical and transport infrastructures according to the parameters established in the subject.
The parameters that determine the content of the project are:
The qualification of the submitted project will be a minimum value of 0.0 on a maximum of 10.0 points, taking into account that:
You can only get scores of 5.0 points if:
In order to evaluate the project presented, it will be taken into account:
- Spelling and written formal expression.
- The clarity of the contents and the cleanliness of the presentation.
- The complete existence of all the contents requested in the subject.
- Adaptation of the contents to the methodologies and work procedures used in the subject.
- Adaptation of the contents of the project to the case addressed by the student.
- The contribution of new visions or approaches not treated in class but appropriate for the case worked and the benefits it requires.
5. Evaluation of the exhibition and defense of the Project
The students will have to carry out the exercise by groups to exhibit and to defend the project realized before
The qualification of the exhibition and defense of the Project will be a minimum value of 0.0 on a maximum of 10.0 points.
In order to evaluate the exhibition and defense, it will be taken into account some groupal aspects:
Some individual aspects will be be taken into account as well:
GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBJECT
The global evaluation of the subject will be made by means of the weighted sum of the different aspects evaluated according to the percentages indicated at the beginning of point VIII and will be a value between 0.0 and 10.0 points valued as indicated the UAB Academic Regulations:
From |
To |
Qualitative |
NP |
NP |
“No presentado” |
0,0 |
4,9 |
“Suspenso” |
5,0 |
6,9 |
“Aprobado” |
7,0 |
8,9 |
“Notable” |
9,0 |
10,0 |
“Excelente” |
9,0 |
10,0 |
“Matrícula de Honor” |
The calculation will respond to the following formula according to the numbering indicated at the beginning of the point
CONTINOUS ASSESTMENT: (3. X 0.10)+ (4. X 0.40)+ (5. X 0.20)
GRADE OF THE SUBJECT = (1. X 0.20)+ (2. X 0.10)+ (3. X 0.10)+ (4. X 0.40)+ (5. X 0.20)
IT WILL BE ESSENTIAL TO HAVE COMPLETED THE THEORETICAL EXAMINATION TO BE ABLE TO APPLY THE SUBJECT ASSESSMENT CALCULATION. IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS NOT SO, IT MAY BE RE-ASSESSED, GETTING A MAXIMUM RATING OF 5 OF THIS TEST.
UNIQUE EVALUATION SYSTEM IN NOT CONSIDERED FOR THIS SUBJECT
RECOVERY OF THE SUBJECT
According to article 112 ter. 2 of the UAB Academic Regulations, to participate in the recovery, students must have previously been evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which is equivalent to a minimum of two-thirds of the total grade for the course.
In case of not passing the theoretical exam of the subject, this may be reevaluated obtaining a maximum grade of 5 for this test.
In addition to the exam, if any of the other assessment tests are nottaken or the grade of 5 is not passed, the continuous assessment will be passed to the final assessment. In other words, 100% of the grade will be that of the final evaluation tests in July. Passing these final tests carries a maximum score of 5 on the record.
The student who does not pass the subject in the first instance will have the right to reevaluate those aspects of the assessment system that can be improved in order to pass the subject.
The improvable aspects that may be reevaluated are:
1. Individual Theoretical Exam
4. Individual assessment of the work by the tutor
5. Evaluation of the submitted project
6. Evaluation of the exhibition and defense of the project
The evaluation system will follow the same principles indicated above
Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a change in the grade will be rated zero (0). For example, plagiarizing, copying, letting copy ..., an evaluation activity will involve suspending this evaluation activity with a zero (0). Assessment activities classified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these assessment activities to pass the course, this course will be suspended directly, with no opportunity to recover it in the same course.
NORMATIVA
http://www.codigotecnico.org/web/
www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/03/24/pdfs/A12841-12850.pdf
http://www.proteccioncivil.org/es/DGPCE/legisla/le_021985.htm
http://www.f2i2.net/legislacionseguridadindustrial/legislacionNacionalGrupo.aspx?idregl=76
http://www.f2i2.net/legislacionseguridadindustrial/legislacionNacionalGrupo.aspx?idregl=49
http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2017-6606
http://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2023/02/15/tma135
PROTECCION CIVIL.
http://www.proteccioncivil.org
PLANES DE AUTOPROTECCIÓN.
Material de apoyo. ISPC “Institut de Seguretat Publica de Catalunya”
http://ispc.gencat.cat/ca/1_linstitut/08_publicacions/totes_les_publicacions/
Enrique Alejandro Contellez Díaz
Ed. Marcombo
ISBN 978 84 267 1606 4
http://interior.gencat.cat/ca/arees_dactuacio/proteccio_civil/paus_hermes/
AUTOCAD
Fernando Montaño La Cruz
Ed. ANAYA
ISBN-13 978-8441547148
AMBITO DE LAS INFRAESTRUCTURAS LOGISTICAS Y DE TRANSPORTE FERROVIARIAS
http://www.adif.es/es_ES/index.shtml
http://www.renfe.com/empresa/index.html
http://www.fgc.cat/cat/index.asp
http://www.fomento.gob.es/MFOM/LANG_CASTELLANO/ORGANOS_COLEGIADOS/CIAF/
http://www.seguridadferroviaria.es/
RSSB. Rail Safety and Standards Board. (GB Rail)
This subject will use
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | afternoon |