Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Manupscript of the TFG	60	0	0	CM38, CM39, CM40, CM41, KM53, KM54, SM51, SM52, SM53, SM54
Oral Dissertation of TFG	30	1	0.04	CM38, CM39, CM40, CM41, KM53, KM54, SM51, SM52, SM53, SM54
Preliminar version of the TFG	10	0	0	CM38, CM39, CM40, CM41, KM53, KM54, SM51, SM52, SM53, SM54

It is essential to pass the TFG to hand in the aforementioned documents (TFG Versions and Final Written Work) and make the oral presentation within the established deadlines, as the opposite case implies a "non-evaluable". The enrolled student who does not present the TFG in June, may present it in a call in January of the following year. In this case, you will have to re-register for the subject.

The presentation and public exhibition is mandatory and will consist of the TFG's oral defense in front of a court, of which the person tutoring the work will be a part of it and will have to give their approval beforehand. TFG cannot be done in groups as the academic regulations of the UAB establish in its article 119.4. that "the evaluation of the work will always be individual, even if the activity has been developed collectively". Therefore, the presentation and defense of the work will always be individual.

The TFG has no re-evaluation, in accordance with current regulations. There is only one call.

The TFG is excluded from the compensation evaluation mechanism as specified in article 122 of the UAB Academic Regulations. The evaluation throught credit compensation is a mechanism that allows the compensation of grades between subjects of a degree and which is regulated in the Academic Regulations of the UAB.

In the case of the TFG, enrolled students who have not provided the teaching staff with any kind of evidence of learning throughout the course are considered "non-evaluable". Therefore, if, for example, a student enrolls and gives the teaching staff linked to this subject any evidence of learning related to the TFG (e.g. in February the written version of the first version of the TFG) but does not hand in the overall text of the TFG, yes it will be considered assessable and willreceive a grade.

EVALUATION

The evaluation will be based on rubrics that will be made public in the tfe tool at the beginning of the course.

The evaluation board will be made up of two people, and the tutor will not be part of it.

The weighting of the note will be as follows:

- TFG follow-up and completion of the documentary tools course - 10%

- Written work: 60% (60% grade from the tutor and 40% grade from the court)

- Oral presentation: 30% of the court's grade.

 

SCORES

The grades used in the TFG will be those of the 0-10 scale, with a single decimal point.

Given the peculiarity of the TFG, for the granting of the "Honors Matriculation" the degree will designate a committee (which may coincide with the teaching staff of the Teaching Committee) that takes into account 75% of the TFG mark and 25% the grade of the student's file. The MH are only granted in the June call,

The student can request an ordinary review of the grade with the coordinator. The coordinator's review must be personal and individualized and before the closing date of the TFG's proceedings. The student can ask the coordinator for a copy of the evaluations on the work will be from the tutor and the other two members of the panel (These copies of the reports are the documentary evidence required to request membership of the panel (These copies of the reports are the documentary evidence required to request the extraordinary review).Once the review is done and the student's allegations are heard, the coordinator, in agreement with the tutor, can maintain or modify the grade.

PLAGIARISM / COPYING

Thecopying or plagiarism of material, documents, publications, etc. inthe TFG it will mean a qualification with a zero.

Remember that a work that reproduces all or a large part of another colleague's work is considered a "copy". "Plagiarism" is the act of presenting all or part of an author's text as one's own, without citing the sources, whether on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html

UNIQUE EVALUATION

There is no single evaluation.

 

EVALUATION CRITERIA

- Mastery of theoretical knowledge in the approach and development of the TFG.

- Ability to integrate theoretical and applied knowledge.

- Ability to search for independent information.

- Mastery of management tools and treatment of geographic information.

- Ability to analyze and synthesize the information used.

- Ability to argue and reason in the presentation of ideas and the development of the TFG.

- Quality of communication and written expression.

- Quality of the presentation: formal aspects.

- Quality of the exhibition: communication and oral expression.

- Quality of the exhibition: form and contents.

 

TFG PUBLICATION

The TFG protocol of the Faculty of Letters recommends the publication in the UAB Digital Document Repository of all TFG with a final grade equal to or higher than 9. In order to be able to publish it, the student must sign and give the TFG coordinator the consent document drawn up by the Humanities Library.

In the event that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may beinstituted. In the event that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.