Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500892 Physiotherapy | FB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Bioestadística: it is advisable to have basic knowledge of mathematics
This subject aims to help the student with the basic training in scientific methodology and bioestadística. Physiotherapy professionals face a set of situations-problem, in which they test their abilities (selection of information, organization of reasoning, distinction between the fundamental and the accessory, statistical interpretation of health problems ...). The purpose is to structure a critical and thoughtful thinking that allows the correct use of scientific knowledge in health sciences and the analysis and resolution of problems in the field of physiotherapy.
The subject raises the basic knowledge and abilities to apply in the accomplishment of the final work of degree.
Scientific Methodology
Theoretical and methodological bases of the research. Scientific approach. Sources of knowledge. Scientific method. Investigation process. Problem and study objectives. Hypotheses and variables. Study subjects: population, sample, sampling and selection criteria. Study designs. Data collection methods. Ethical considerations. Praxis based on Evidence.
Biostatistics:
Introduction to biostatistics. Basics Collection and tabulation of the information. Graphic presentation of the research. Measures of central tendency. Contingency tables and regression line. Binomial and normal distribution. Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests.
Documentary sources. Bibliographical review and sources of information
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom Practices | 4 | 0.16 | 2, 6, 7, 5, 17 |
Lab Practices | 20 | 0.8 | 2, 16, 18, 6, 10, 7, 11, 5, 17 |
THEORY (TE) | 21 | 0.84 | 16 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal Study | 99 | 3.96 | 2, 6, 10, 11, 5 |
Activities are designed and planned so that students can achieve the relevant learning outcomes.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bioestadística - Deliveries of written works / practices to deliver | 15% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 3, 6, 10, 7, 11, 5, 17 |
Bioestadística - Written evaluation through objective tests of selection of multiple choice items | 35% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 16, 18, 19, 13, 5, 17 |
Scientific methodology: Deliveries of written works | 15% | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 16, 18, 3, 10, 9, 8, 19, 15, 12, 13, 14, 4 |
Scientific methodology: Written evaluation through objective tests of selection of multiple choice items | 35% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 5, 17 |
Evaluation criteria:
scientific methodology: individual or group work is compulsory and if one of them is not presented within the established period, it will be evaluated as zero (0).
- The final grade of the subject is the sum of the note obtained in scientific methodology and bioestadística with the weight established in this guide, as long as they have a minimum grade of 4 in each module. The weighting of both biostatistics as a scientific methodology will be carried out whenever the minimum mark of the written work and the grade of the exams are at least 4.
-The partial evaluation activities to which the student is not present will make an average of 0.
Definition of NO EVALUATION: In each part of the subject, both scientific methodology and bioestadística, it will be understood by Nonvalueable (NA) that situation in which the student DOES NOT present to 50% or more of the evaluation activities . Likewise, having a NA in one of the two parts of the subject, will represent a NA in the whole course.
There will be a recovery exam for those students who have not approved the subject through standard modality. In order to participate in this exam the students must have been previously evaluated in a series of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject
- Single assessment: Students who request it, following the instructions of the University and the Faculty of Medicine, will have the possibility of being evaluated in a single test. The test will be at the end of the academic year and will include all the syllabus taught throughout the course, both theory and practice, and the minimum grade necessary to pass will be 5 points in both moduls. The moment students request this kind of examination, it will be considered that the final grade of the subject will be the one obtained in this test. Recovery: The same recovery system will beapplied as for the continuous evaluation
Review Tests: All students have the right to review the assessment tests by appointment with the teacher. The review will consist of an individual tutorial where the student will be given the feedback.
The treatment of possible individual cases will be carried out from a teaching committee (made up of the coordinator of the subject, and 2 of the professors of the same, 1 of each department involved) where the student's particular situation will be evaluated and the most appropriate decisions will be taken.
Reconsideration evidence: All students who have not passedthe continuous assessment with a different note from Non-Appraising (NA) have the right to proof of recovery at first call.
Bibliografy
Francisca Ríus Díaz, Julia Wärnberg. Bioestadística 2ªed. Madrid: Ed Paraninfo, 2015
Cobo E, Muñoz P, González JA. Bioestadística para no estadísticos: principios para interpretar un estudio científico. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson, 2007.
Gerrish, K, Lacey A. Investigación en Enfermería. Madrid: McGraw-Hill-Interamericana 2008.
Polit D., Hungler, B. Investigación científica en Ciencias de la Salud 6a ed. México : McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2000.
Argimon J.M., Jimenez J. Métodos de investigación clínica y epidemiológica. 4ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier España,SA, 2013.
Abad E., Monistrol O., Altarribas E ., Paredes A. Lectura crítica de la literatura científica. Enfermería Clínica 2003;13(1): p.32-40.
Rodríguez del Águila M.M, Pérez S., Sordo L., Fernández M. A. Cómo elaborar un protocolo de investigación en salud Med Clin (Barc).2007;129(8): p. 299-302.
Cabezali Sánchez JM, Sánchez Aldeguer J. El cuestionario: bases metodológicas y su utilización en Fisioterapia, para lograr una mayor calidad asistencial. Fisioterapia 1997;19(2):97-103
Fernandez de Sanmamed MJ Adecuación de las normas de publicación en revistas científicas a las investigaciones cualitativas. Atención Primaria Vol.25 Núm. (7): p. 118-122
Fernández de Sanmamed MJ, Calderón C. Investigación Cualitativa en Atención Primaria. En: Martín Zurro A, Cano Pérez JF. Atención Primaria. 5ª ed. Barcelona: Hancourt Internacional;2003.
Links
http://blogs.uab.cat/cuidabloc/
http://www.scopus.org
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
http://www.easp.es/exploraevidencia/
http://www.fisterra.com
http://www.msc.es/resp
http://www.doaj.org
Internet resources, legislation and ethical consideration:
- Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial
Biostatistics
Software: IBM SPSS
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 101 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | afternoon |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 102 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | afternoon |
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 101 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 102 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 103 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 104 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 101 | Catalan/Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |