Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2501573 Economics | OT | 3 |
2501573 Economics | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Have passed the subjects of Macroeconomics I, Macroeconomics II and Macroeconomics III.
This course presents the standard models for analyzing economic growth and long-term income differences between countries. We will analyze models where growth is generated through capital accumulation and models where growth arises from the technological decisions of firms.
TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMIC GROWTH
a. Empirical observations on global income levels
b. Welfare indicators in the data
c. Economic convergence between countries
TOPIC 2: MODELS OF EXOGENOUS GROWTH
a. The Solow Model
i. Dynamics of capital and the golden rule.
ii. The Solow model with exogenous growth.
iii. The problem of dynamic inefficiency.
iv. Conditional convergence between countries.
b. The Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans Model
i. Intertemporal consumption-savings choice.
ii. The Euler equation and the transversality condition.
iii. The dynamical system, convergence, stability, and response to exogenous shocks.
iv. The savings rate and the process of structural transformation.
TOPIC 4: TOWARDS ENDOGENOUS GROWTH
a. The AK model.
b. Endogenous growth from knowledge externalities.
c. The semi-endogenous growth model.
TOPIC 5: MODELS OF EXPANDING VARIETIES: THE ROMER MODEL (1990)
a. Knowledge as a non-rival and partially exclusive good.
b. The optimization problem of the innovative sector.
c. Knowledge externalities and the social planner problem.
d. Implications for the design of innovation policies.
TOPIC 6: DIRECTED TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
a. The direction of technological change: price effects and market size effects.
b. Application: wage gaps and the skill premium.
TOPIC 7: SCHUMPETERIAN GROWTH MODELS
a. Growth through creative destruction.
b. The Aghion-Howitt (1992) quality ladder model.
c. Application: the relationship between innovation and imperfect competition in the product market.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exercises and group discussion | 17 | 0.68 | 9, 14, 13, 12, 10, 11, 16 |
Lectures | 32.5 | 1.3 | 1, 2, 4, 6, 15 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 20 | 0.8 | 9, 14, 16 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Readings | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 15 |
Studying, preparation of homeworks and group discussion | 47 | 1.88 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 12, 10, 11, 16 |
The tipe of teaching methodology planned for the course is in-site teaching.
This subject combines lectures with ITC support and more applied sessions devoted to problem solving.
The proposed teaching methodology may undergo some modifications according to the restrictions imposed by the health authorities on on-campus courses.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Class participation | 5% | 0 | 0 | 12, 16 |
Final exam | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 14, 13, 10, 11, 15 |
Homework | 10% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 13, 12, 10, 11, 15 |
Midterm exam | 35% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 14, 13, 10, 11, 15 |
Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation of the course will be carried out continuously and will include four evaluation activities of three different typologies, one of them will be a final exam with a weight of 50% in the final grade, one midterm exam with a weight of 35% in the final grade, a series of homeworks with a total weight of 10% in the final grade and class participation with a wieght of 5%.
Calendar of evaluation activities
Calendar of evaluation activities
The dates of the evaluation activities (midterm exams, exercises in the classroom, assignments, ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.
The date of the final exam is scheduled in the assessment calendar of the Faculty.
"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity." Section 1 of Article 264. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB).
Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' reschedule: e-Formulari per a la reprogramació de proves.
Grade revision process
After all grading activities have ended, students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.
Retake Process
"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject." Section 2 of Article 261. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject greater than or equal to 3.5 and less than 5.
The date of the retake exam will be posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who take this exam and pass, will get a grade of 5 for the subject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, student will fail the course.
Irregularities in evaluation activities
In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0". Section 11 of Article 266. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).
This subject does not offer the option for comprehensive evaluation.
Basic
- ACEMOGLU, D. (2009): Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.
- BARRO, R., and X. SALA-I-MARTIN (1999): Economic Growth. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- JONES, C. and D. VOLLRATH (2024): Introduction to Economic Growth. 4th Edition. W.W. Norton & Company.
Complementary
- AGHION, P., and P. HOWITT (1992): A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60(2), 323-352.
- JONES, C. (2015): The Facts of Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper No. 21142.
- JONES, C. (2022): The Past and Future of Economic Growth: A Semi-Endogenous Perspective, Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 14, pp 125-152.
- ROMER, P. M. (1986): Increasing Return and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1036.
- ROMER, P. M. (1990): Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.
Without specific computer programs.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 8 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 8 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |