Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500786 Law | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no prerequisites.
TEACHING STAFF:
Grup 01: Montse Sole
Sem 11: Alba Rocosa
Sem 12: Montse Solé
Sem 13: Marta Garcia
Grup 02: Helena Ysàs
Sem 11: Vidal Aragonès
Sem 12: Helena Ysàs
Sem 13. Júlia Senra
Grup 51: David Gutiérrez
Sem 511: Jessica Romero
Sem 512: David Gutiérrez
Sem 513: Javier Sénchez
Grup 70: Helena Ysàs/ to be determined
Sem 701: Helena Ysàs/ to be determined
Sem 512. Ferran Rosell
The teaching of this course will consider the sustainable development goals.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Practical targeted activities | 22 | 0.88 | 22, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 14, 19, 18, 20 |
Theoretical classes | 22 | 0.88 | 1, 28, 5, 31, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21, 16, 12, 29, 30, 34, 33 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorial | 5 | 0.2 | 22, 1, 5, 31, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21, 16, 12, 29, 34, 33 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study | 40 | 1.6 | 22, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 14, 19, 18, 20, 21 |
preparation of the activities covered in the seminars | 50 | 2 |
Learning process
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EVALUATION | 50 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 22, 3, 4, 26, 6, 9, 13, 14, 19, 18, 20, 21 |
REEVALUATION | 50/100 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 22, 1, 28, 5, 31, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21, 16, 12, 29, 30, 34, 33 |
continuous evaluation of seminars | 50 | 6 | 0.24 | 22, 1, 2, 3, 4, 28, 24, 25, 23, 26, 5, 6, 31, 7, 9, 8, 10, 11, 32, 13, 14, 19, 18, 17, 20, 21, 27, 16, 15, 12, 29, 30, 34, 33 |
1. ORDINARY EVALUATION SYSTEM
This system combines the continuous evaluation of the work done in the seminars and the resolution of a final theoretical exam.
1.1 Continuous evaluation of the work done in the seminars.
The final grade corresponding to the continuous evaluation of the work done in the seminars will be the arithmetic mean of the grades obtained in the four evaluation activities described above in the section "Methodology" (three evaluation activities of thematic block and one evaluation activity on participation and follow-up). In this sense, the thematic block evaluation activities will have a value, as a whole, of 35 or 40 percent of the grade, while participation and follow-up will have a value of 10 or 15 percent of the grade (the specific percentage will be determined by the faculty at the beginning of the semester).
1.2 Ordinary final theoretical exam
Only those who have participated in at least two of the thematic block evaluation activities proposed in the framework of the seminars will be able to take the exam, regardless of the final grade obtained in the continuous evaluation.
The exam will consist of the resolution of between 5 and 10 questions, some of which may correspond to issues addressed through practical activities. Each of the exam questions will be graded from 0 to 10 points. The grade of the exam will be obtained from the average of the total score obtained divided by the number of questions. The grade of the theoretical exam will have the value of 50 per 100 of the overall grade.
The evaluation and re-evaluation exams must be taken on the dates scheduled by the Academic Management and published from the beginning of the course. The evaluation and re-evaluation exams will only be rescheduled when the conditions foreseen in the academic regulations of the UAB are met.
1.3 Grading of the subject in the ordinary evaluation system.
The grade of the course in the ordinary evaluation system will be obtained by taking the arithmetic mean between two grades: the final grade of the continuous evaluation of the work done in the seminars and the grade obtained in the ordinary theoretical final exam. If this minimum is not reached, the grade will be "fail" and the numerical value will be that corresponding to the average of the exam and the continuous evaluation with a maximum limit of 4 in order to be able to access, if necessary, to the evaluation by compensation.
If, taking into account the above, the arithmetic average reaches a minimum of 5 points out of 10, the course will be considered passed through the ordinary evaluation. Otherwise, it will be possible to take the re-evaluation, where it will only be necessary to examine the part or parts where a minimum score of 5 points has not been obtained in the ordinary evaluation.
2. RE-EVALUATION
Those who have taken part in the ordinary evaluation by participating in at least three of the evaluation activities proposed in the ordinary evaluation system, which must include the final ordinary theoretical exam and at least two thematic block evaluation activities, will have access to the reevaluation.
It will consist of two parts, one theoretical and the other practical, made up respectively by a theoretical exam and a practical exam. Only the part or parts where a minimum score of 5 points has not been obtained in the ordinary evaluation may be examined.
The theoretical re-evaluation exam will have the same format and characteristics as the ordinary final theoretical exam.
The practical exam will consist of the resolution of a practical case with the thematic content corresponding to the subjects covered in the framework of the seminars, similar to those raised in the evaluation activities of the thematic blocks.
The grade of the subject in the re-evaluation will be obtained by taking the arithmetic mean between two grades: the grade obtained in the theoretical re-evaluation exam (or in its case in the final ordinary theoretical exam) and the grade obtained in the practical re-evaluation exam (or in its case the final grade of the continuous evaluation of the work done in the seminars). It will be understood that the practical or seminar part has been passed when a minimum grade of 5 has been obtained in the set of activities integrated by the thematic block evaluations and participation.
If this minimum is not reached, the grade will be "fail" and the numerical value will be that corresponding to the average of the exam and the continuous evaluation or the practical exam with a maximum limit of 4 in order to be able to access, if necessary, to the evaluation by compensation.
If the arithmetic average reaches a minimum of 5 points out of 10, the course will be considered passed through the re-evaluation.
The student will be evaluable as long as he/she has carried out a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade of the subject. If the value of the activities performed does not reach this threshold, the teacher of the subject may consider the student as not evaluable
3. Single evaluation
Persons who have requested and obtained the single evaluation must undergo, on the same day, the following evaluation activities:
3.1. A test questionnaire (20 % of the mark).
Consisting of 20 questions with four possible answers and only one correct answer.
3.2. A practical exam (30 % of the grade).
It will have the same characteristics as the practical re-evaluation exam described above.
3.3. A theoretical exam (50 % of the mark)
It shall have the same characteristics as the ordinary final theoretical examination described in point 1.2.
3.4. Qualification of the course in the single evaluation system
The subject will be considered passed by single evaluation when the sum of the grades obtained in thethree evaluation activities indicated, according to the weight that each case corresponds to, exceeds 5 points out of 10, provided that the grade corresponding to the theoretical exam indicated in point 3.3 is at least 5 points out of 10. If this minimum is not reached the grade will be "fail" and the numerical value corresponding to the theoretical exam expressed in the parameter 0-10.
Those who do not pass the subject by single evaluation will have the right to re-evaluation in the terms specified in section 2.
The non eligibility for evaluation criterion will be the same as for continuous evaluation.
4. Fraudulent conduct
A person who copies or attempts to copy an evaluation activity will have a 0 in that activity. A person who submits a practical activity in which there is plagiarism will get a 0 and will receive a 0 in that activity.
Recommended bibliography (the compulsory one, if is required) will be specified by the teacher in charge of each group:
Normativa:
Código Universitario de Derecho del Trabajo, Boletín Oficial del estado, https://www.boe.es/biblioteca_juridica/codigos/codigo.php?id=289&modo=2¬a=0&tab=2
Legislación social básica. Ed. Civitas, latest edition
Legislación laboral y de Seguridad Social. Ed. Tecnos, latest edition
Legislación laboral y de Seguridad Social. Ed. Aranzadi, latest edition
The subjec does not require any specific software.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 51 | Spanish | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 70 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |