Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500786 Law | OB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The teaching of the subject will be taught taking into account the perspective of the sustainable development objectives.
For an understanding and a correct follow-up of this subject it is advisable to have passed the two previous subjects (Criminal Law I and Criminal Law II). With respect to other subjects under study in the first year, it is also especially a good knowledge of the basic institutions object of the Constitutional Law programs.
Group 01: Rafael Rebollo Vargas
Seminari 1: Rafael Rebollo Vargas (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 2: María José Pifarrer De Moner (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Pep López Sánchez (Spanish/Catalan)
Group 02: María José Rodríguez Puerta
Seminari 1: María José Rodriguez Puerta (Spanish)
Seminari 2: Víctor Muñoz Casalta (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Margarita Bonet Esteva (Catalan)
Group 51: Margarita Bonet Esteve
Seminari 1: Margarita Bonet Esteve (Catalan)
Seminari 2: Josep Riba Ciurana (Spanish/Catalan)
Seminari 3: Lidia Pérez Casasayas (Spanish/Catalan)
Group Dret + ADE: Margarita Bonet Esteva
Seminari 1: Magarita Bonet Esteva (Catalan)
Seminari 2: María José Rodríguez Puerta (Spanish)
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Seminars | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 16, 17, 14, 18, 24, 3, 15, 27, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 33 |
Theoretical classes. | 22 | 0.88 | 2, 5, 6, 9, 8, 14, 13, 18, 19, 27, 33 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 0 | 0 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Elaboration of the various activities of the seminars | 35 | 1.4 | 1, 2, 26, 4, 5, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 22, 16, 17, 14, 13, 18, 24, 3, 20, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 32, 33 |
Realization of schemes, conceptual maps and summaries. | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 6, 23, 24, 29, 12 |
Study | 56 | 2.24 | 1, 5, 6, 8, 25, 13, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 12 |
Methodology
The work that must be carried out for the adequate learning of the contents discussed in this document requires the completion of two types of activities.
1.- Directed activities. These activities are carried out in the classroom and consist:
Master classes taught by the teaching staff in which the theoretical contents of the subject will be presented (50% of the time).
Seminars: Once the fundamental contents of each of the subjects of the subject have been presented, they will be worked on in the seminars/workshops. The activity carried out in these will be eminently practical and will consist of reading texts, court resolutions and carrying out mock trials and presentations on complementary topics, which will be done in groups to prepare for the evaluation tests (50% of the time). .
2.- Autonomous activities. These activities complement the previous ones and aim for students to work individually and in groups on the contents of the subject. These activities are of two types:
Group work on the materials that will be analyzed in the workshops/seminars on a weekly basis. Several group projects will be carried out and presented in the seminars.
Individual work on the topics and readings of the seminars. Students must study the subject and carry out individual work that will be delivered in writing through Moodle.
Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved within the calendar established by the center or by the degree for students to fill out surveys to evaluate the teaching staff's performance and evaluate the subject or module.
The methodology to be used in this subject in the double degree in Law +ADE may vary. The professor in charge will specify when and how the practical activities will be carried out.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Individual work (solution of cases with jurisprudence, comments on sentences or doctrinal articles) | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 5, 6, 25, 14, 18, 23 |
Overall final test | 50% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 26, 4, 5, 7, 9, 8, 34, 21, 22, 16, 17, 13, 19, 24, 3, 20, 15, 10, 11, 27, 28, 30, 29, 35, 12, 31, 32, 33 |
1. Continuous evaluation model
Classes start and finish on time, no entry after the start of the class and no exit before the end will be accepted.
The evaluation activity will be carried out throughout the quarter, requiring regular attendance of the student in classes (80%) and the completion of the activities detailed below.
Continued evaluation (value on final grade: 50%). The continuous assessment activities are of your types:
1. Individual activities will consist of the resolution of 2 groups of cases (value on final score: 50%). The first will have a value of 20% and the second 35%.
2. Group activities of seminars. Each seminar will propose an activity to prepare before the seminar or to deliver after, which may consist in the search for jurisprudence, reading and understanding of judgments and conducting simulated trials. Practical cases to prepare assessment tests will also be conducted and resolved. These activities will serve to evaluate the evolution of the student, they have a formative character).
3. Final set test: type test (value on final grade: 50%)
If someone does not show up for one of the individual assessment activities, it can only be recovered if the absence is justified.
2. Single assessment
The student who opts for the single assessment will have to pass an exam that will consist of 2 activities to be performed in 3 hours on the day of the final test:
A multiple-choice test, the same as the student who performs the continuing assessment (value on the final grade: 50%). 1 h
The resolution of 2 cases (value on final score: 50%). 2 a. m.
Like the rest of the student, the student who opts for the single assessment will have the right to request the attention of the teacher responsible for the subject, throughout the semester, in the schedule established for the tutoring.
The same criterion as in the continuing evaluation will be applied to qualify as “Not evaluable”.
3. Standards for passing the subject and reassessment
To pass the assessment it is necessary to obtain a grade of 5 (both in the continuous and single assessment model).
In order to be able to add the scores of the various activities it is necessary to have obtained, at least, a score of 2/5 in the test. If the test score is less than 2, you will have to reevaluate.
If the test score is equal to or greater than 2 and the sum of the scores does not reach 5, the reassessment will have to be done. For this purpose it will be proposed to carry out a case/cases and/or test.
The student will be evaluable provided that he has carried out a set of activities the weight of which is equal to 2/3 parts of the total qualification of the subject. If the value of the activities does not reach this value, the teacher of the subject may consider it “Invaluable”.
If during an exam the presence of students copying is detected, they will be automatically suspended without the possibility of access to recovery. In case of plagiarism in the writing of works, each case will be evaluated and, in the extreme case, the option of direct suspense without the option of recovery will be considered.
Mandatory readings
- To prepare the seminars, specific and complementary bibliography will be provided via Moodle.
Each professor responsible for the subject may recommend complementary bibliography through the Moodle.
Westlaw and other case law databases.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 51 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 70 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |