Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500798 Primary Education | FB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Differences and Inclusion is a subject that does not involve any requirement in principle. However, the competencies and methodology of the subject involve an active attitude of the students, it means, an active participation in class, a predisposition for conceptual shifts, the previous reading of some articles and cooperative attitude to work in cooperative teams. Furthermore, the knowledge learned in Learning and Development I and II subjects will facilitate the comprehension of the contents.
Differences and Inclusion is part of the Basic Course: Learning and Personality Development (Ordre Ministerial ECI/3857/2007). This is a basic and compulsory course, which is related with the basic courses of the context of Social and Juridical Sciences: Education and Psychology. The course involves 15 ECTS credits, distributed in three compulsory subjects, of 6, 4, and 5 credits respectively: Learning and Development I; Learning and development II, and Differences and Inclusion. Each subject lingers one semester and they are taken at the second and third year course of the Bachelor studies.
Differences and Inclusionis a basic course of 5 credits within the Bachelor studies of Primary Education. Together with the rest of the courses of the studies, especially the courses of pedagogy, sociology, and specific didactics, it is orientated towards professionalization of students. Its objective is to help construct criteria to analyse and comprehend the educative school practices and to develop skills to design and implement the teaching practice to attend to diversity. It means situations that entail special support needs.
Learning Objectives:
1. Differences
1.1 Personal, social and cultural diversity.
1.2 Differences in school education: problems and challenges.
2 Inclusion
2.1. From integration to inclusion.
2.2 Key Concepts in inclusive education: process, barriers for participation and learning, support.
2.3. International, State and national regulations
3 Schools toward inclusion
3.1 Factors that determine process of inclusion.
3.2 planning, implementation and improving inclusive plans.
3.3. Participation of the school community.
4. Inclusive response in the classroom
4.1 Strategies for inclusion; planning for all, diversity of activities and assistance, adjusted assessment.
4.2 Supports to the inclusion: peer learning, co-teaching and community involvement.
5. Conditions that can behave special needs
5.1. Conditions of social risk, disability, behavioural problems, highs abilities and learning difficulties.
5.2 Psycopedagogical evaluation and participation and learning plans.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Presential work in whole and half group | 38 | 1.52 | 1, 3, 16, 14 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Group supervision | 22 | 0.88 | 1, 3, 16, 14 |
Individual final test | 3 | 0.12 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous work individual or in groups | 62 | 2.48 | 1, 3, 16 |
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19
There will be a directed work in two different formats. On the one hand, a presential or face-to-face work in large group where the subject and general content will be presented by the Professor. This space is also used for the presentation by students of their works. It takes place with all the group class.
In other sessions, there will be a split-up class with two workspaces (1/2 of the large group) supervised by the teacher and where will be held the explanation of the main contents through an open and active participation by students, through document analysis, resolution of cases or activities.
An autonomous work by the student is also expected. through theoretical readings of texts, preparation of tests, preparation and analysis of cases, activities and optional tutorials, both individual and collective. This space will also be dedicated to research, analysis and evaluation of information about the Monography.
Finally, a supervised work in group or individually, if it is necessary will take place in order to follow-up and resolve problems during the elaboration of the different evaluative activities.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Free deaph work | can tune the final not from 0 to 2 points | 0 | 0 | 1, 16, 7, 8, 12, 6 |
Group Monography | 25% | 0 | 0 | 1, 3, 16, 18, 13, 15, 12, 6, 4 |
Group porfolio | 25% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 11, 10, 7, 9, 8, 14, 6, 4, 5 |
Individual final test | 50% | 0 | 0 | 3, 17, 10, 7, 8, 14, 12, 6, 4, 5 |
Assessment is the tool that collects both the process and the results of learning.
Assessment will consist of class attendance and assessment activities.
Requirements for passing the course.
Attend a minimum of 80% of classes. The average of the three assessment-activity grades will be applied on passing the individual test.
Portfolio/critical review of class content (25% of final grade). In this Portfolio students critically review the contents worked on throughout the course (opinions, doubts, controversies, content that has been studied more fully, literature reviews, connection with the internship or with students’ own experience, etc.). Additionally, activities carried out throughout the course must also be included in this portfolio. Two submissions of work are required, one in the middle of the course (12,5%); the other at the end (12,5%). The final submission alone will be subjected to a quantitative assessment. A consultation and monitoring system will be established for this purpose.
The Monograph. Original-work activity (25% of final grade). Research, analysis and assessment of information collected at a school. The task will be orally presented in class and a final written document will also be submitted. A consultation and monitoring system will be established for this purpose. Submission at the end of semester,
Individual final test. Students will have to demonstrate comprehension of the basic contents of the course (50% of final grade). Drafting the Portfolio should facilitate consolidating the knowledge to be assessed in this test. It takes place on the week after the oral Monograph oral presentation.
Optional further study. This work—individual or in groups—will consist of further study of a specific content (related to course content); it also contains a practical section. This further study of content should therefore be related to real-life contexts. Successful completion of the optioncan vary the final grade by a maximum of 2 points (on condition that all other activities have been submitted and the test grade awarded is at least 5.0). Submission at the end of semester,
In order to establish the average grade for all the activities, a minimum score of 5.0 is required for all the assessment activities, and session attendance must be at least 80%.
All forms of plagiarism in any assessment activity and/or copying in an exam are reasons for beingawarded an immediate fail grade.
Students whose individual test grade is 3.5 or higher, but who have not reached the minimum pass grade, will have the option of a retake by a test. It will take place beetween 307& to 4/7, depending on the group. Details of this will be announced. The results of the retake exam -which takes place the first week of July- will be "pass" or "fail". In case of being passed, the final individual test score will be 5, and the rest of group qualifications will be applied to get the final qualification.
This subject includes activities for the development of Teaching Digital Competence, both in the portfolio, and in the presentation of the Monography that includes infographics and presentation.
Single assessment. Although the single assessment is not recommended due to the characteristics of the course, students must apply for it before the deadline set by the secretary's office. The single assessment requires class attendance, test and the submission of the compulsory evidence (Portfolio and Monograph), which will be individual and will be presented on the day of the individual test, which will teake place beetwen 16 to 20/6, depending on the group. The same weights will be applied to each activity, the same retake system and the same procedure for the revision of the final grade as for the continuous assessment.
Ainscow, M. (2001). Desarrollo de escuelas inclusivas. Ideas, propuestas y experiencias para mejorar las instituciones escolares. Narcea.
Albertí, M. i Romero, L. (2010). Alumnado con discapacidad visual. Graó.
Alegret, J.; Castanys, E. i Selllarès, R. (2010). Alumnado en situación de estrés emocional. Graó.
Alsina, G., Saumell, C., i Arroyo, À. (2011). Alumnado con dificultades de regulación del comportamiento (I). Infantil y primaria (Vol. I). Graó.
Arnaiz, P. (2003). Educación inclusiva: una escuela para todos. Aljibe.
Bassedas, E. (2010). Alumnado con discapacidad intelectual y retraso del desarrollo. Graó.
Booth, T. i Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for Inclusion. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. (2005) Índex per a la inclusió. Guia per a l’avaluació i millora de l’educació inclusiva. ICE-UB.
Carbonell, E. (2024). Aprenent a veus. Un segle d'educació diferenciada. Associació de Mestres Rosa Sensat.
Bolea, E. i Gallardo, A. (2010). Alumnado con dificultades de regulación del comportamiento. Graó.
Cardona, C. (2005). Diversidad y educación inclusiva. Pearson.
Cardona, C.; Gomar, C. Palmés, C. i Sadurní, N. (2010). Alumnado con pérdida auditiva. Graó.
Duran, D. (2016). Aprensenyar. Evidències i implicacions educatives d'aprendre ensenyant. Horsori.
Duran, D. (Coord.), Flores, M., Oller, M., Corcelles, M., Miquel, E., i Blanch, S. (2018). Llegim i escrivim en parella: Tutoria entre iguals, amb implicació familiar, per a la competència comunicativa. Horsori.
Duran, D.; Giné, C. i Marchesi, A. (2010). Guia per a l’anàlisi, la reflexió i la valoració de practiques inclusives. Generalitat de Catalunya.
Duran, D. i Monereo, C. (2021). Entramat. Mètodes d'aprenentatge cooperatiu i col·laboratiu. Horsori.
Echeita, G. (2019). Educación inclusiva. El sueño de una noche de verano. Octaedro.
Echeita, G. (2006). Educación para la inclusión o educación sin exclusiones. Narcea.
Echeita, G. I Verdugo, M. A. (2004). La Declaración deSalamanca sobre Necesidades Educativas especiales 10 años despúes. Valoración y Perspectiva. Inico.
Flores, M., Duran, D., i Albarracín, L. (2016). (En)Raonem en parella. Tutoria entre iguals per a la resolució cooperativa de problemes quotidians. Horsori.
Giné, C. (coord.) (1996). Trastorns del desenvolupament i Necessitats Educatives Especials. UOC. / Intervenció psicopedagògica en els transtorns del desenvolupament. Edició del 2000.
Giné, C.; Duran, D.; Font, J.; Miquel, E. (coord.) (2020). L'educació inclusiva. De l'exclusió a la plena participació de tot l'alumnat. Horsori.
Gispert, D. i Ribas, L. (2010). Alumnado con dificultades en elaprendizaje de la lectura. Graó.
Gonzalez, R.M. i Guinart, S. (2010). Alumnado en situación de riesgo social. Graó.
Guirado, A. i Martínez, M. (2011). Alumnado con altas capacidades. Graó.
Herrero, P. (2021). Guia de llenguatge inclusiu en el tractament de persones amb discapacitat. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura. Direcció General de Política Lingüística
Hortal, C. (coord.)(2011). Alumnado con trastorno del espectro autista. Graó.
Huguet, T. (2006). Aprendre junts a l’aula.Una proposta inclusiva. Graó.
Oller, C. i Colomé, E. (2010). Alumnado de otras culturas. Graó.
Macarulla, I. i Saiz, M. (2009). Buenas prácticas de esculea inclusiva. La inclusión de alumnado con discapacidad: un reto, una necesidad. Graó.
Marchesi, A. i Martín, E. (1998). Calidad de Enseñanza en tiempos de cambio. Alianza.
Marchesi, A. Coll, C. i Palacios, J. (2001). Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 3. Trastornos de desarrollo y necesidades educativas especiales. Alianza Editorial.
Martínez, M. i Guirado , A. (2012). Altas capacidades intelectuales. Graó.
Ministerio De Asuntos Exteriores y Cooperación (2010). La Convención Internacional de Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de las personas con Discapacidad vistapor sus protagonistas. Down España.
Monereo, C.; Castelló, M.; Bassols, M.; Miquel, E. (1998) Instantànies. Projectes per atendre la diversitat. Edicions 62.
Moya, A. (2002). El profesorado de apoyo. Alijibe.
Puigdellívol, I.; Petreñas, C.; Siles, B. i Jardí, A. (eds.). (2019). Estrategias de a`poyo en la escuela inclusiva. Graó.
Pujolàs, P. (2003). Aprendre junts alumnes diferents. Eumo.
Rosell, C.; Soro-Camats, E. y Basil, C. (2010). Alumnado con discapacidad motriz. Graó.
Saumell, C.; Alsina, G. y Arroyo, A. (2011). Alumnado con dificultades de regulación del comportamiento. Graó.
Sellarès, R., Alegret, J., i Castanys, E. (2010). Alumnado en situación de estrés emocional. Graó.
Stainback, S. i Stainback W. (1999). Aulas inclusivas. Narcea.
Topping, K., Buchs, C., Duran, D., i Van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge.
Topping, K., Duran, D.,i Van Keer, H. (2015). Using Peer Tutoring to Improve Reading Skills. Routledge.
Torrego, J. C. y Negro, A. (2017). Aprendizaje cooperativo en las aulas. Alianza editorial.
Urmeneta, M. (2010). Alumnado con problemas de salud. Graó.
Revistes:
Boletín del Real Patronato de Prevención y de Atención a Personas con Minusvalía. Madrid.
Journal of Inclusive Education. London: Routledge
Revista de l’Associació Catalana d’Atenció Precoç (ACAP). Barcelona
Revista de Educación Especial. Salamanca. Amarú.
Revista de Educación Inclusiva. Universidad de Jaén.
Revista Española de Síndrome de Down. Santander: Fundación Síndrome de Down.
Revista Internacional de Educación Inclusiva. Chile. Siglo Cero. Madrid: FEAPS.
Suports. Revista Catalana d’Educació inclusiva i Atenció a les diversitats. Vic: EUMO.
Enllaços web:
https://xtec.gencat.cat/ca/curriculum/diversitat-i-inclusio/
https://www.unesco.org/es/education/inclusion
There is no particular software.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 211 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 212 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 311 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 312 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 411 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 412 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 711 | English | second semester | afternoon |
(SEM) Seminars | 712 | English | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 21 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 31 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 41 | Catalan | second semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 71 | English | second semester | afternoon |