Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500798 Primary Education | OB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
The main objective of this practicum is that the students, in group, establish a first contact as future school professionals. Students will be assigned to different schools in groups of 5 and will carry out a general observation of three fundamental aspects: the social context of the school, the school’s organization and classroom life.
This document presents the objectives to be achieved for each of the three aforementioned points and considers the issues to be taken into consideration in drafting the report, giving some indications on how to organize and to successfully accomplish this Practicum.
General objectives
Instrumental goals:
1. Use of tools for systematic observation of school and social reality.
2. Collect and process primary data (interviews, observation diary, etc.) and secondary sources (statistics, analysis of documents,...). Interpreting this information in relation to the theoretical knowledge acquired in other related subjects.
3. Communicate formally the results obtained through the analysis of social and school reality.
The contents of this course are the following:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Stay in school practices and observations in the territory | 70 | 2.8 | 5, 6, 9, 14, 15 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Seminar discussion and evaluation processes designed. Exhibitions of work. Debates and reflections on key issues. Monitoring of group work. | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 1, 5, 6, 9, 12, 11, 15 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study territory. Analysis school reality. Preparation of individual and collective memory. Field diary. Preparation and presentation of seminars. | 63 | 2.52 | 2, 3, 8, 5, 7, 9, 12, 11, 15, 18 |
The course Practicum 1 of the Primary Education Degree is a module formed by different formative activities with an exploratory purpose. It is oriented towards the global analysis of social and educational reality. The different activities are organized around two variables: location and grouping.
A) Location: It refers to the location where the practicum takes place. They can be classroom or field activities. Classroom activities include workshops, seminars and tutorials, either individual or collective, that help to plan and establish the formative activities that form the module Practicum I. Field activities include those activities developed outside the university, mainly linked to a primary school and in relation to the territory where it is located.
B) Grouping: Depending on their nature, they can be individual or group activities. Individual activities include those that each student must accomplish on his/her own. These activities can be addressed at the preparation of the fieldwork or the study of the available data of the territory. Group activities represent the most important part of the module. The group of students assigned to a particular school are expected to work cooperatively to accomplish them.
The Faculty administration will assign a maximum of 5 students to each of the schools assigned to the UAB. The students assigned to the same school will constitute a working team that operates collectively in all the group activities of the course.
Only the Faculty and in extraordinary circumstances can modify the composition of the groups or the school assignments.
Students registered in one academic group will be divided in geographic areas and will have a tutor of the Faculty.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final report | 45% | 0 | 0 | 2, 3, 8, 5, 6, 17, 7, 9, 12, 11, 15, 16, 18 |
Mentoring, seminars and exhibitions of works | 20% | 2 | 0.08 | 3, 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15 |
School report | 35% | 0 | 0 | 4, 5, 6, 17, 7, 9, 12, 11, 13, 14, 15 |
This course does not include a single assessment procedure.
The evaluation of the Pràcticum should enable the achievement of the competences identified in this guide to be verified. It must also take into account the overall design of the subject and its methodological orientations. The evaluation consists of a series of indicators to be taken into account:
1. Final Report. It represents 45% of the evaluation and represents a descriptive, evaluative and analytical synthesis of the different activities, researches and observations carried out during the whole of Practicum I. The evaluation of the final report includes an individual evaluation part that will be carried out from the individual classroom observation journals, the group journal where the aspects of organization, planning and execution of the work will be recorded, as well as the contribution of each of the members of the group and the evaluation of the work dynamics. The note in the final report will be individual. The deadline for submission of the final report is 13th June.
2. Tutorials, seminars and presentations (9th June) represent a weight of 20% of the evaluation, which will be individual. They involve the supervision and follow-up of some practical and methodological activities by the faculty of the Faculty, attendance and participation in plenary meetings to communicate, assess and analyse the information collected to the different schools and their environments and the presentation of the work done in classroom session.
3. School assessment report, which involves 35% of the evaluation, must be issued by the teacher responsible for the internship at the school.
In order to pass this course, the student must obtain a minimum score of five in each of the evidences evaluated (final report, tutorials, seminars, presentations and the school's report).
In addition, in order to be evaluated, the student must have shown an attitude compatible with the teaching profession and must have met some minimum requirements:
- They have to comply with the requirements of the calendar and assumed the assigned responsibilities.
- They must show respect for all members of the educational community.
- They have to respect the school's regulations (timetable, use of mobile phones, clothing, etc.).
- They must use the vehicular language in accordance with the guidelines of the centre.
All evaluation activities carried out during the course must be submitted by the deadline indicated by the teaching staff in the programme.
The grades to the final report will be available within twenty working days of submission.
Attendance at seminars is mandatory. Otherwise it will be considered as 'Non-assessable'. The supporting documents are only used to explain the absence and do not exempt the student from attendance.
All activities (individual and group) will take into account linguistic correctness, editing and formal aspects of presentation. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and have a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity may be returned (not assessed) or failed if the teacher considers that it does not meet these requirements.
We remind you that, in the case of the Catalan language, the 1st and 2nd grade students are required to have a linguistic competence equivalent to Level 1 for Infant and Primary Education Teachers; and that from the 3rd grade onwards the student must have shown a competence equivalent to Level 2 for Infant and Primary Education Teachers (more information on these levels at https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/competencia-linguistica-1345737529755.html).
Copying or plagiarism, both in the case of assignments or exams, is an offense that can represent a failing grade. A work, activity or examination will be considered to be "copied" when it reproduces all or part of the work of one or more colleagues. A work or activity will be considered "plagiarized" when it is presented as its own a part of an author's text without citing the sources, regardless of whether the original sources are in paper or digital format. In the event that total or partial plagiarismof one of the evaluation activities is detected, the subject will be suspended directly and the numerical grade that will remain will be a 3. (More information on plagiarism at https://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html).
Under no circumstances will the student pass if he or she receives a negative report of the internship by the school and/or if the student shows an attitude incompatible with the teaching profession. In other cases, teachers may require the completion of an individual assignment to amend the individual grade obtained from the internship report.
Generic information about assessment regulations: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/grau/informacio-academica/avaluacio/en-que-consisteix-l-avaluacio-1345662177201.html
ALEGRE, M.A. (2006). L’acollida i l’escolarització de l’alumnat d’origen estranger al sistema educatiu català. A BONAL, X (dir.) L’Estat de l’educació a Catalunya. Anuari 2005. Barcelona: Mediterrània.
ANYON, J. (1999). Clase Social y conocimiento escolar, a Fernández Enguita, M. (comp.) Sociología de la educación. Textos fundamentales. Barcelona: Ariel.
ANTÚNEZ S. (1993). Claves para la organización de centros escolares. Barcelona: Horsori.
ANTÚNEZ, S., GAIRÍN, J. (1996). Fundamentos y prácticas de la organización escolar. Barcelona: Graó.
ARMENGOL, C., PALLARÉS, R.M., Feixas, M. (2003). Seguint el fil de l'organització. Col.lecció Materials. Servei de Publicacions, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
BERTRAN, M. (2015). Eines i recursos per a la realització del pràcticum. A FEIXAS, M; JARIOT, M; TOMÀS-FOLCH, M (2015) El pràcticum de pedagogía i Educació Social. Materials, núm. 231.(pp. 123-129), Bellaterra.
FERNANDEZ PALOMARES. F. (Coord) (2003). Sociología de la Educación. Madrid: Pearson.
GAIRÍN, J. y DARDER, P. (Coord.) (1996). Organización de centros educativos. Aspectos básicos. Barcelona: Praxis.
GARCIA GRACIA, M. (2003). El sistema de enseñanza como construcción histórica y social a FRANCISCO FERNÁNDEZ PALOMARES (Coord.) Sociología de la educación. (pp.87-114) Madrid: Pearson.
PARSONS, T. (1990). El aula como sistema social: algunas desus funciones en la sociedad americana, Educación y Sociedad, 6, 173-195.
RIVAS FLORES, J (1983). El aula como microsociedad: Significación social del aula y de la relación educativa. A GARCIA DE LEÓN et al. Sociología de la Educación. Barcelona: Barcanova.
RODRIGUEZ, M. (2015) L’observació de la interacció. A FEIXAS,M., JARIOT, M., TOMÀS-FOLCH, M. (2015). El pràcticum de pedagogía i Educació Social. Materials, núm. 231 (pp, 153-164) Bellaterra.
SANTOS, M. (2000). La escuela que aprende. Madrid: Morata.
No especific software is required in order to carry out this course.
Information on the teaching languages can be checked on the CONTENTS section of the guide.