Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500797 Early Childhood Education | FB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
No requirements
The aim of this course is to present the relationship between the different bodies taht represent Society, Family and School
Section A. Pedagogy
Right to education, childhood and family policies
1. The right to education from a historical perspective
2. Child protection
3. The educational role of the family
Management of community relations for coexistence
4. Management of community relations and family
5. School, diversity and inequality: handling diversity from schools. Inequalities and discriminations.
Section B: Sociology
Social change and family diversity
1. Family and school diversity
2. Ruptures and separations and school
3. Work-life balance
4. Poverty and educational exclusion
5. Interculturality. Transnational families and parenting
Family-school participation
6. Family Involvement in School: Why and for What?
7. The structures of participation of families in schools.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Evaluation | 0 | 0 | 3, 5 |
Presencial in large grup | 30 | 1.2 | 11, 3 |
Seminars | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 5 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activities | 30 | 1.2 | 2, 3 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomus activities | 75 | 3 | 3 |
- They will be dynamic and digital classes for the large group: the digital class directed to the large group allows the exposition of the main contents and elements of discussion of the different thematic blocks and the seminars are spaces of work in small groups to analyse and debate the activities proposed by the teaching staff mainly on the Virtual Campus, to complement the theoretical sessions. Seminars will be held on campus and attendance is compulsory. Students will be assigned to one of the groups scheduled at the beginning of the course.
- This course includes activities for the development of Digital Teaching Competence.
- The activities supervised by the lecturer outside the classroom include a series of individual and group tutorials, both physical and virtual, which must be used to resolve difficulties, orientate tasks and ensure understanding of the learning of the subject.
- Autonomous work is work done independently by the student and involves the preparation of readings, cases and other types of tasks, exercises or work, to get the most out of the sessions and achieve the objectives of the subject.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deepening work Seminar Section A (group activity) | 15% | 0 | 0 | 1, 10, 3, 4, 8, 9, 13 |
Deepening work Seminar Section B (group activity) | 15% | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Evidences Section A Seminars (individual activty) | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 12, 6, 10, 2, 4, 8, 9, 13 |
Evidences Section B Seminars (individual) | 10% | 0 | 0 | 12, 8, 9 |
Test Section B (individual activity) | 25% | 0 | 0 | 12, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 |
Text Section A (individual activity) | 25% | 0 | 0 | 6, 10, 11, 2, 8 |
The evaluation of the course will be held throughout the academic year through the activities shown in the grid below: assistances and participation in seminars (20%), personal work (30%), exam (50%)
The continued assessment of the subject will be carried out throughout the academic year using the activities shown in the following grid.
Class attendance is mandatory: students must attend at least 80% of the classes, otherwise they will not be considered for evaluation. Attendance to both theoretical and practical classes will be controled.
The results of each of the assessment activities will be communicated to thestudents through the Moodle no longer than 20 working days from the due date. After the grades of each activity are communicated to the students, they can attend to the professors' office hours for any queries concerning the assessment up to 10 days after their publication.
The final grade of the subject will be calculated by weighting the proposed evaluation activities, as indicated on the grid. In order to pass the subject, each of the evaluation activities it consists of will be approved with a minimum of 5. Students will be able to do a re-evaluation in case they have not passed any of the evidence of evaluation (within the school period and marked in the schedule). The final grade for this reevaluation will be approved or unapproved.
The dates of the different evaluation activities are shown in the following table:
Activity |
Average Weight |
Dates Group 61 |
Dates Group 62 |
Deepening work seminar section A (group activity) |
15% |
Seminari date |
Seminari date |
Deepening work seminar section B (group activity) |
15% |
Seminar date |
Seminar date |
Test Section A (individual activity) |
25% |
22/10/2024 |
18/10/2024 |
Test Section B (individual activity) |
25% |
03/12/2024 |
13/12/2024 |
Evidences Seminars Section A (individual activity) |
10% |
Each seminar |
Each seminar |
Evidences Seminars Section B (individual activity) |
10% |
Each seminar |
Each seminar |
Resubmission |
|
28/01/2025 |
31/01/2025 |
To pass this course, the student should show a good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing and a good command of the language and communication language contained in the syllabus.
To pass this course, the student must show good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the language or languages spoken in the teaching guide.
All the activities developed by the students must be oriented to achieve an inclusive and accessible society that allows advancing towards the full autonomy of people, avoiding discrimination and promoting equal opportunities for everyone. It will use inclusive language in accordance with the following document: https://www.uab.cat/doc/pistes-us-no-sexista-llenguatge
In all the activities (individual and in group) the linguistic correction, the writing and the formal aspects of presentation will be taken into account. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of comprehension of academic texts. We remind you that, in the case of the Catalan language, in the 1st and 2nd year it is requested that the student has a linguistic competence equivalent to Level 1 for Teachers of Infant and Primary Education and that from the 3rd year of the Degree the student must have shown a competence equivalent to Level 2 for Teachers of Infant and Primary Education. See: http://www.uab.cat/web/els-estudis/-competencia-linguistica-1345698914384.html and "Normativa d'avaluació en els estudis de la UAB" http://mat.uab.cat/~seccio/documents/arxiu/Normativa_avaluacio.pdf).
The same system will be applied for the recovery of the single evaluation as in the continuous evaluation.
Inaccordance with UAB regulations, plagiarism or copying of any individual or grouppaper will be penalised with a mark of 0 for that paper, without any possibility of a re-sit. During the completion of a paper or the individual exam in class, if the teacher has reason to believe that a student is trying to copy or s/he discovers any kind of non-authorised document or device, the student involved will obtain a mark of 0, without any possibility to re-sit. A paper or test will be consideredas plagiarism when a chunk of text of four words or longer authored by another person (another student, scholar, webpage, etc.) without citing the source according to academic norms. Further information available at:
https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf
http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html
Aler Gay, I. (2006). La transformación de la maternidad en la sociedad española: 1975-2005. Documento de trabajo 22006/02.Centros de Estudios Andaluces.
Andrés, S. & Giró, J. (2014). El papel y la representación del profesorado en la participación de las familias en la escuela. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 19 (1) , 61-71. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.19.1.245461.
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2003). La reinvención de la familia: en busca de nuevas formas de conviviencia. Madrid: Paidós.
Bornstein, M., Yu, J., & Putnick, D. (2020). Mothers’ parenting knowledge and its sources in five societies: Specificity in and across Argentina, Belgium, Italy, South Korea, and the United States. International journal of behavioral development, 44(2), 135-145. doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419861440
Cabrera, D., Funes, J., & Brullet, C. (2004). Alumnado, familias y sistema educativo. Los retos de la institución escolar. Barcelona: Octaedro-FIES. Flaquer, L. (2000). Las políticas familiares en una perspectiva comparada. Barcelona: Fundació "La Caixa".
Comas, M., Escapa, S., & Abellán, C. (2014). Com participen mares i pares a l'escola? Diversitat familiar i d'implicació en educació. Informes Breus, 49. Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill.
Conroy, M., McKnight, K., & Sutherland, K. (2019). Partnering with families of students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. In Family, school, and community partnerships for students with disabilities (pp. 57-69). Springer, Singapore.
Garreta, J. (2012). Famílies i escoles . La participació de les famílies als centres educatius.Lleida: Editorial Pagès i Ajuntament de Lleida.
Higueras-Rodríguez, L., & Fernández Gálvez, J. D. D. (2016). El papel de la familia en la educación de los niños con altas capacidades intelectuales. url: http://hdl.handle.net/10433/4921
INCLUD-ED Consortium (2011). Actuaciones de Éxito en las Escuelas Europeas. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación. Gobierno de España.
Plexousakis, S., Kourkoutas, E., Giovazolias, T., Chatira, K., & Nikolopoulos, D. (2019). School bullying and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: The role of parental bonding. Frontiers in public health, 7, 75. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00075
Purola, K., & Kuusisto, A. (2021). Parental participation and connectedness through family social capital theory in the early childhood education community. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1923361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1923361
Save the children (2018). Sota el mateix sostre. Les Cases dels Infants: un recurs per atendre els nens i nenes víctimes d’abús sexual i les seves famílies a Catalunya. Url: https://www.savethechildren.es/sites/default/files/imce/docs/sota-el-mateix-sostre-web-doble.pdf
Tomasevski, K. (2004). El asalto a la educación. Barcelona: Intermón/Oxfam.
Vila, I. (1998). Familia, escuela y comunidad. Barcelona: Editorial Horsori.
For this subject, a technological device that can be connected to the Internet is indispensable.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(SEM) Seminars | 611 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEM) Seminars | 621 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 61 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 62 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |