Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2502501 Prevention and Integral Safety and Security | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There is not. General prior knowledge in prevention and safety is necessary.
Know the legal resources and the administrative aspects to be able to cope easily in the relations with public administrations and private entities.
Correctly apply the current legal framework on prevention and comprehensive safety to different private and public activities.
Plan de management of prevention and safety according to the legislation and powers of the different administrations, and the obligations of the companies in the sector.
The student must demonstrate ability to relate to any administrative body and know their rights and duties in this area.
The student must demonstrate that the correctly applies the current legal framework in matters of prevention and safety.
The student must demonstrate that he knows how to plan the management of prevention and safety, initiating the administrative procedures corresponding to the specific activity.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classes with the active participation of students | 44 | 1.76 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Practices. Resolution of practical cases. Debates and discussion forums. | 12 | 0.48 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Preparation of reports. Personal study. | 94 | 3.76 |
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
DELIVERY OF THE PRACTICAL WORK CARRIED OUT BY THE STUDENT | 25 % | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
DELIVERY OF THE PRACTICAL WORK CARRIED OUT BY THE STUDENT | 25 % | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 |
WRITTEN PROOF THAT ALLOWS TO VALUE THE KNOWLEDGE ACQUIRED BY THE STUDENT | 50 % | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 |
ONGOING EVALUATION
The evaluation system will consist of the preparation and delivery of two ongoing evaluation (PAC) work on practical cases in the field of food safety which will be delivered to the moodle classroom.
Each of the tests (PAC) will have 50% of the total note value: 25% for each PEC. In order to be able to stand the final written test on food safety, it will be necessary to obtain at least an average of 5 out of the two tests (PECs) of 10 out of each.
Students will carry out an in-person written assessment of the subject. This written test on the content of the subject will have a value above the total note of 50%
RE-EVALUATION
In case of not passing the subject according to the aforementioned criteria (continuous evaluation), a recovery test may be done on the date scheduled in the schedule, and it will cover the entire contents of the program.
To participate in the reassessment the students must have been previously evaluated of a set of activities, the weight of which equals a minimum of two-thirds of the total grade of the subject. However, the qualification that will consist of the student's file is a maximum of 5-Approved.
Students who need to change an evaluation date must present the justified request by filling in the document that you will find in the moodle space of Tutorial EPSI.
SINGLE ASSESSMENT:
Students who opt for the single assessment will perform a final synthesis test of all assignment contents (50%) and submit an assignment job on a proposed practical case (50%).
The date for this assessment and submission of the assignment's work will be the same as the schedule for the last continuous assessment exam.
The same recovery system will be applied as for continuous evaluation.
STUDENT NOT EVALUABLE: Any student who has not taken at least 2/3 of the content of the total grade of the subject will be considered "not evaluable" andwill not be able to take the subject's recovery. . This same criterion will be applied in the case of the single evaluation.
PLAGIARISM
Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the event that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, it will be graded with a 0 This evaluation act, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0 ".
The tests / exams may be written and / or oral at the discretion of the teaching staff.
If during the correction there are indications that an activity or work has been done with answers assisted by artificial intelligence, the teacher may supplement the activity with a personal interview to corroborate the authorship of the text.
- ARANCETA, J.; AMARILLA, Nuria; Alimentación y Derecho. Aspectos legales y nutricionales de la alimentación. Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2010.
- COLOMER XENA, Yvonne; Clotet Ballús, Ramon; González Vaqué, Luis; El sistema alimentario. Globalización, sostenibilidad, seguridad y cultura alimentaria. Thomson Reuters ARANZADI, 2016.
- GONZÁLEZ VAQUÉ, Luís; Lecciones de Derecho Alimentario 2015-2016. THOMSON REUTERS Aranzadi, Navarra, 2015.
- HIDALGO MOYA, Juan Ramón; El principio de precaución y los riesgos alimentarios. Revista Consumer, 26 de abril de 2001. Dirección web: http://www.consumer.es/seguridad-alimentaria/normativa-legal/2001/04/26/120.php
-HIDALGO MOYA, Juan Ramón; ¿Qué es un alimento? Revista Consumer, 28 de enero de 2002. Dirección web: http://www.consumer.es/seguridad-alimentaria/normativa-legal/2002/01/28/659.php
-HIDALGO MOYA, Juan Ramón; Los derechos del consumidor en seguridad alimentaria. Revista Consumer, 14 de enero de 2002. Dirección web: http://www.consumer.es/seguridad-alimentaria/normativa-legal/2002/01/14/621.php
- HIDALGO MOYA, Juan Ramón; Revisión del principio de precaución. Revista Consumer, 5 de diciembre de 2005. Dirección web: http://www.consumer.es/seguridad-alimentaria/normativa-legal/2005/12/05/21469.php
- PARRA LUCÁN, Mª ÁNGELES; Daños por producto y protección del consumidor. José Maria Bosch Editor. Barcelona, 1990.
- RODRIGUEZ FONT, Mariola; Régimen jurídico de la seguridad alimentaria. De la policía administrativa a la gestión de riesgos. Marcial Pons, 2007.
- VAN DER MEULEN, Bernd; MARTÍN, Ana. La Estructura Del Derecho Alimentario Europeo (The Structure of European Food Law). 22 de octubre de 2014. Wageningen Working Paper in Law and Governance 2014/06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2479418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2479418
LINKS:
AESAN: https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/web/subhomes/seguridad_alimentaria/aecosan_seguridad_alimentaria.htm
EURLEX: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/chapter/food_safety.html?root_default=SUM_1_CODED=30
ELIKA: https://seguridadalimentaria.elika.eus
PLA SEGURETAT ALIMENTÀRIA
ADDITIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170622
https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/applications/apdeskapplworkflownutrinovel2018.pdf
https://canalsalut.gencat.cat/ca/vida-saludable/alimentacio/sostenible/index.html#googtrans(ca|es)
https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/9bc01348-eb71-4041-96d8-bf149844aaf8
https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_es
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/IP_18_6067
https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/desarrollo-rural/temas/innovacion-medio-rural/bioeconomia/
https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/web/seguridad_alimentaria/detalle/programas_control.htm
https://www.aesan.gob.es/AECOSAN/web/seguridad_alimentaria/detalle/riesgos_biologicos.htm
https://acsa.gencat.cat/es/seguretat_alimentaria/cadena_alimentaria/vigilancia_i_control_oficial/
This subject does not require a specific syllabus.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |