Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2504386 English and Spanish Studies | FB | 1 |
2504388 Catalan and Spanish Studies | FB | 1 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Since the student has demonstrated, by obtaining the credits corresponding to the basic and compulsory training subjects, that he has acquired the basic competences, he must be able to express himself / herself correctly orally and in writing. In the case of written expression, it's understood that the student will write paragraphs with full content. Obviously, spelling errors, punctuation and speech structure will be taken into account. 0,25 points will be deducted for each error; any evaluable test that contains more than 10 errors will not continue to be corrected.
The activities, practices and works presented in the subject must be original and will not admit, under any circumstances, the total or partial plagiarism of other people's materials published in any support. Any presentation of non-original material without properly indicating its origin will automatically lead to the rating of suspense (0).
It is also considered that the student knows the general rules of presentation of an academic work. However, you can apply the specific rules that may be indicated by the teacher of the subject, if you deem it necessary.
"Commentary of literary texts" is integrated in the set of the subject Commentary of texts, that forms by part of the 108 credits of compulsory training of the Degree of Spanish Language and Literature, and that the student study together with other subjects of language and Spanish literature.
The main objectives of the course are to familiarize students with text commentary by providing them with the necessary tools for this, to consolidate the skills needed to make a text commentary from any of the periods of Spanish literature.
1.Introduction to commentary on literary texts
The delimitation of the literary text
The contextualization of the text
Author and tradition
The resources of the literary language
Main critical approaches
2. Poetry
Fixing the subject
The structure
Stylistic analysis
Versification
Rhetorical figures
3. Narrative
Plot and conflict
Characters
Point of view
Time and space
Narrative techniques
4. Theater
Plot and conflict
Dramatic structure
Dialogues
Characters
Time and space
The scenic language
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes, classroom | 60 | 2.4 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised Activities | 15 | 0.6 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
To elaborate acdemic essays, personal study and readiness | 75 | 3 |
The learning of this subject by the students is distributed as follows:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam 1 | 35% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 4 |
Exam 2 | 35% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 4 |
Participation | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 4 |
Text Comment | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 4 |
The evaluation will consist of:
two written texts delivered throughout the course (30% each),
one written test (30%)
and participation (10%).
In order to be evaluated, students must submit the three items within the term established by the teacher, as well as that he / she meets the requirement of having participated in class.
Spelling mistakes, punctuation and speech structure will be taken into account. Misspelings will deduct 0.25 points each.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Students will be able to adhere to the single Assessment and will have to take the same three tests on the dates determined by the faculty
Evaluation review procedure
At the time of each evaluation activity, the teacher will inform the student (Moodle) of the procedure and date of revision of the grades.
Recovery procedure:
Students who, once the average of the various tests has been completed, do not obtain a grade equal to or greater than 5 may take recovery, providedthey meet the following requirements:
1. Have submitted the two text comments on writen.
2. Having taken the written test and having obtained at least a 3.5 in it.
3. Have participated in class in the manner stipulated by the teacher.
The grade obtained in the recovery will replace the lowest grade obtained throughout the course.
In the event that a student having obtained less than a 5 in more than one test, he / she will be able to agree with the teacher which evaluation will recover.
The student will receive the grade of "Not assessable" as long as he / she has not delivered more than 30% of the evaluation activities.
Students will be able to adhere to the single evaluation and will have to take the same three tests on the dates determined by the faculty. Single evaluation: the delivery of the three evaluable tests may coincide with the last test of the group, or with one of the possible days that the Faculty has enabled. The two comments will represent 70% of the mark (35% + 35%) and the final test, 30%. The recovery will follow the same criteria as the continuous assessment.
AA. VV. (1973), El comentario de textos, 1, Madrid, Castalia.
AA. VV. (1977), El comentario de textos, 2. De Galdós a García Márquez, Madrid.
AA. VV. (1982), El comentario de textos, 3. La novela realista, Madrid, Castalia.
AA. VV. (1983), El comentario de textos, 4. La poesía medieval, Madrid, Castalia.
Azaustre, Antonio, y Juan Casas, (1997), Manual de retórica española, Ariel, Barcelona.
Cesarini, Remo (2004), "Glosario", en Introducción a los estudios literarios. Madrid, Crítica, pp. 247-312.
Clavería, Gloria; Poch, Dolors (2010), Al otro lado del espejo. Comentario lingüístico de textos literarios, Barcelona, Ariel.
Culler, Jonathan (2000), Breve introducción a la teoría literaria. Barcelona, Crítica.
Domínguez Caparrós, José (1977), Introducción al comentario de textos, Madrid, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
García Barrientos, José-Luis (2017), Cómo se analiza una obra de teatro: ensayo de método, Madrid, Síntesis.
Hernández Guerrero, José Antonio y María del Carmen García Tejera (2005), Teoría, historia y práctica del comentario literario, Barcelona, Ariel.
López-Casanova, Arcadio (1994), El texto poético. Teoría y metodología. Salamanca, Colegio de España.
Marchese, Angelo, y Joaquín Forradellas (1986), Diccionario de retórica, crítica y terminología literaria, Barcelona, Ariel.
Moreiro, Julián (1996), Cómo leer textos literarios. El equipaje del lector, Madrid, Edaf.
Navarro Durán, Rosa (1995), La mirada al texto: comentario de textos literarios, Barcelona, Ariel.
Pozuelo, José María (1988), Teoría del lenguaje literario, Madrid, Cátedra (ediciones posteriores).
Segre, Cesare (1985), Principios de análisis del texto literario, Barcelona, Crítica
Torres Nebrera, Gregorio (1999), Entendimiento del poema: de Rubén Darío a Claudio Rodríguez, Madrid, Ediciones de la Torre.
Villanueva, Darío (1992), Comentario de textos narrativos: la novela. Gijón, Ediciones Júcar, pp. 181-201.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 2 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 3 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 2 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 3 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |