Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4314949 General Health Psychology | OB | 1 | 2 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
There are no prerequisites.
The philosophy of the Master Dissertation (MD) is to confront the student with a real research problem related to general health psychology, either by joining a research team to contribute to an already started line, or by identifying, with the help from the tutor/s, a health need, problem or lack of interest. To achieve this purpose, the TFM places the student in a position to deploy and combine all the skills developed so far in order to 1) solve the problem or question addressed and thereby 2) demonstrate that they possess the capacity for which the MUPGS will accredit you: that of using your knowledge and skills to solve real problems.
During the TFM I subject, the student will, in agreement with the person(s) who tutor their work, carry out the feasibility report of their MD, including the search for information that allows the definition of research problem, a preliminary version of the MD introduction and the choice of methodology. This report becomes the master's dissertation planning, which will be executed later in the subject DM-II.
The student can choose one of the following options depending on his/her interests and the interests or proposals allowed by the tutor supervising their work:
A. Systematic Review following PRISMA Guidelines
B. Empirical Research
C. Development of a new tool for Health Psychology practice: therapy programmes, health guidelines, e-health project, assessment procedures....
The student develops the competences acquired during the Master’s Degree in order to achieve the option he/she has chosen (Systematic Review, Empirical Research or Development of a New Tool) following the guidelines provided by the tutor. The student works autonomously and is assisted by his/her tutor. The hours spent on each task (autonomous work, tutorials, assessment and coordination) are described in the following table
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
Follow-up sessions with the academic tutor | 6 | 0.24 | 7, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 4, 10, 2, 9, 13, 11, 12 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Developing MD feasibility report | 68.5 | 2.74 | 7, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 4, 10, 2, 9, 13, 11, 12 |
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Delivery of the DM feasibility report | 100 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 7, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 4, 10, 2, 9, 13, 11, 12 |
http://www.apastyle.org
www.coneixement.accio.gencat.cat/eines
In this subject no specific software is served