Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4316837 Tourism Management in Cultural Heritage | OB | 1 | 2 |
To check the language/s of instruction, you must click on "Methodolody" section of the course guide.
There are no prerequisits
The objective of this module is to demonstrate that the student masters dominate the appropriate theoretical and methodological concepts and instruments to conduct their own and in-depth research on the chosen topic related to the cultural tourism sector. And demonstrate that they can research in the future and/or be able to meet the needs that the tourism cultural sector may have in the management and creation of its contents.
The objectives of this module are as follows:
To implement the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the master's degree in a Final Work written and subsequently defended before a court.
Demonstrate your knowledge of the techniques of analysis and description that corresponds to the theme you have chosen within the relationship tourism - cultural heritage- arts and humanities
Having mastery of the bibliography, the use of fonts and their application, if necessary, with specific exemplification, and all from original approaches, as well as results derived from said study.
The teaching methodology of this module is as follows:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom | 4 | 0.16 | 4, 8, 9 |
Partials Delivery Work | 11 | 0.44 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 3, 4, 7, 10 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Workshop | 260 | 10.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 |
The evaluation activities of this module are based on:
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic Tutor Assessment | 40% | 5 | 0.2 | 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 |
Assessment of Oral Defense of the Master's Final Work Tribunal | 30% | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 5, 6, 7 |
Assessment of the Master's Final Work Tribunal | 30% | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 |
Aguirre Baztan, Ángel (2002) Etnografía: metodología cualitativa en la investigación socio cultura. México: Alfaomega.
Delgado, Juan Manuel; Gutierrez, Juan (2010). Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid: Sintésis.
Denzin N, Lincoln Yvonna, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
Hammersley M. y Atkison P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidos.
Iñiguez Rueda, L. (1999). “Investigación y Evaluación Cualitativa: Bases teóricas y conceptuales”. En Atención Primaria. Vol. 23 Núm. 8. Mayo 1999. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
Iñiguez Rueda, L. y Antaki C. (1994). El análisis del discurso en psicología social. En: Boletín de Psicología 1994; 44: 57-75. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
Krueger R.A. (1991). El grupo de discusión. Guía práctica para la investigación aplicada. Madrid: Pirámide
Lozano J. y Peña Marin Cristiña. (1989). Análisis del discurso. Hacia una semiótica de la interacción textual. Madrid: Cátedra.
Martinez M., Miguel (2013). La investigación cualitativa etnográfica en educación. Editorial Trillas, México.
Mays N, Pope Catherine. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:50-2.
Montero Maritza. (1994). Psicología social comunitaria. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.
Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
Ruiz Olabuenaga J.I. (1997). Metodología de investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Sandoval C. Módulo cuatro: investigación cualitativa. Programa de Especialización en Teoría, Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Social. ARFO; 2002.
At Moodle Platform