Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313178 Comparative Literature: Literary and Cultural Studies | OT | 0 | 1 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
· Students must have demonstrated that they understand and have knowledge in an area of study that is based on general university education, and is usually at a level that, although based on specialized textbooks, also includes some aspects that involve knowledge from the forefront of that field of study.
· Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialized and non-specialized audiences.
· Students must be capable of applying their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and they should have building arguments and problem resolution skills within their area of study.
· Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
The course aims to address the study of literary works from the specific perspective of the formal and thematic conventions of the three main literary genres: lyric, narrative and theater (although, eventually, a specific literary genre can be chosen).
Each of these genres will be considered from a historical, rhetorical and pragmatic perspective, during modern and contemporary times, and students will be provided with the main concepts, terms and theoretical and practical references to carry out a particular analysis of literary texts according to the genre to which they belong.
Block I. Poetry
Block II. Theater
Block III. Narrative
Due to its eminently practical nature (already established in the same title of the module), and because it is a subject that belongs to a master of a theoretical and comparative nature, the text commentary will become the main exercise that articulates the face-to-face classes. However, it is understood that these reading practices should not be at odds with some reflections of a more general or abstract nature, about the time, the genre or the nature of the text under consideration, in order to help to better understand the object of study.
Thus, then, not only will the teacher be responsible for carrying out these textual analyzes, but it is intended that students actively collaborate in the elaboration of the meaning of the different proposed works.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Face-to-face seminar class | 69 | 2.76 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual tutorials | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Research and preparation of a monograph | 65 | 2.6 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
The evaluation of the course is composed of three grades, whose sum constitutes 100% of the final grade:
1) Attendance and active participation in class (with a maximum value of 10%).
2) The preparation of a text comment proposed by the teacher, where the student must demonstrate the skills and knowledge (theoretical and practical) acquired throughout the course (with a maximum value of 40%).
3) The elaboration of a monograph on a topic proposed by the teacher or agreed between the student and the tutor of this research (which must be selected from among the teaching staff of this module, and who will be responsible for their grade). This work must be content related to the topics covered in the course program (with a maximum value of 50%).
The passing of the subject does not require mandatory participation in the three evaluable activities, and it is assumed as non-evaluable the person who has not prepared either of the two exercises, that is, neither the text commentary nor the free-topic monograph.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity (copiyng, plagiarism, unauthorized use of AI, etc.), the student will be given a zero for this activity and it will can’t be re-evaluated, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Single assessment: The student will carry out the three evaluation exercises of the subject, with the same value, at the end of the course on a single date that will be established at the beginning of the course.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active and individual participation in the methodological sessions of the module | 10 | 45 | 1.8 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
Elaboration of a monographic work | 50 | 45 | 1.8 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
Making a text comment where the theoretical and practical contents of the course are applied | 40 | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 6, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4 |
AA. DD. [1997], Introducció a la teoria de la literatura, Manresa, Angle Editorial.
AA.DD. [1999], Teorías sobre la lírica, Madrid, Arco /Libros.
M. H. ABRAMS [1974], El espejo y la lámpara, Barcelona, Barral.
Félix De AZÚA [1979], Baudelaire y el artista de la vida moderna, Barcelona, Anagrama.
Ingeborg BACHMANN [1990], Problemas de la literatura contemporánea: conferencias de Francfort, Madrid, Tecnos.
Pere BALLART [1998], El contorn del poema, Barcelona, Quaderns Crema. (V. espanyola: El contorno del poema, Barcelona, El Acantilado, 2005.)
------ [2007], El riure de la màscara, Barcelona, Quaderns Crema.
------ [2011], La veu cantant, Lleida, Pagès Editors.
Isaiah BERLIN [2000], Las raíces del romanticismo, Madrid, Taurus.
María del Carmen BOBES NAVES, [1997], Semiología de la obra dramática, Madrid, Arco Libros.
Carlos BOUSOÑO [1962], Teoría de la expresión poética, Madrid, Gredos, 1970.
Malcom BRADBURY & James McFARLAINE [1976] Modernism. A Guide to European Literature (1890-1930), London, Penguin Books, 1991.
Cleanth BROOKS & Robert Penn WARREN [1960], Understanding Poetry, Nova York, Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
Stanley BURNSHAW [1981], «The Three Revolutions of Modern Poetry», The Poem itself, New York, Horizon Press.
John W. BURROW [2000], La crisis de la razón. El pensamiento europeo (1848-1914), Barcelona, Editorial Crítica, 2001.
Matei CALINESCU [1987], Cinco caras de la modernidad. Modernismo, vanguardia, decadencia, kitsch, posmodernismo, Madrid, Tecnos, 1991.
J. M. COHEN [1958/1966], Poesía de nuestro tiempo (1908-1965), México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1977.
Jonathan CULLER [1978], La poéticaestructuralista, Barcelona, Anagrama.
Terry EAGLETON [2009], La novela inglesa. Una introducción, Madrid, Akal.
Joan FERRATÉ [1968], Dinámica de la poesía, Barcelona, Seix Barral, 1982.
Hugo FRIEDRICH [1959] Estructura de la lírica moderna, Barcelona, Seix Barral.
David FRISBY [1985], Fragmentos de la modernidad. Teorías de la modernidad en la obra de Simmel, Kracauer y Benjamin, Madrid, Visor, 1992.
Peter GAY [2007], Modernidad. La atracción de la herejía de Baudelaire a Beckett, Barcelona, Paidós.
Gustavo GUERRERO [1998], Teorías de la lírica, Mèxic, FCE.
Michael HAMBURGER [1969], La verdad de la poesía, Mèxic, FCE, 1991.
Hans Robert JAUSS [1989], Las transformaciones de lo moderno. Estudios sobre las etapas de la modernidad estética, Madrid, Visor, 1995.
Jordi JULIÀ [1999], Al marge dels versos, Barcelona, Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.
------ [2002], La perspectiva contemporánea. Ensayos de teoría de la literatura y literatura comparada, Santiago de Compostela, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
------ [2011], Poètica de l’exili. L’elegia contemporània a la lírica catalana de postguerra, Palma, Lleonard Muntaner editor.
------ [2014], L’ofici i el do. Poesia i concepcions estètiques a la literatura catalana d’inicis del nou-cents, Manacor, Món de llibres.
------ [2016], Poesia i identitat. Formes de despersonalització de la lírica moderna, València, Institució Alfons el Magnànim-Diputació de València, 2016.
------ [2017], L’autor sense ombra. La figuració literària de l’escriptor entre els segles XIXi XX, València, Publicacions de la Universitat de València, 2017.
Javier APARICIO MAYDEU [2011], El desguace de la tradición. En el taller de la narrativa del siglo XX, Madrid, Càtedra.
Rafael NÚÑEZ RAMOS [1992], La poesía, Madrid, Síntesis.
Patrice PAVIS, [1980], Diccionario del teatro, Barcelona, Paidós, 1999.
Octavio PAZ [1956], El arco y la lira, Mèxic, FCE.
------ [1974], Los hijos del limo, Barcelona, Seix Barral.
Alex PREMINGER & T. V. F. BROGAN (eds.) [1993], Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, Princeton UP.
Ricard SALVAT [2010], Una mirada al teatre modern i contemporani, Barcelona, Institut del Teatre.
Robert SCHOLES (ed.) [1979/1982], Elements of literature, Nova York, Oxford UP.
Robert SCHOLES [1982], Semiotics and Interpretation, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press.
Emil STAIGER [1967], Conceptos fundamentales de poética, Madrid, Rialp.
Enric SULLÀ [2001], Teoría de la novela. Antología de textos del siglo XX, Barcelona, Crítica.
Peter SZONDI [1994], Teoría del drama moderno. Tentativa sobre lo trágico, Barcelona, Destino.
Peter WATSON [2000], A Terrible Beauty. A History of the People & Ideas that Shaped the Modern Mind, London, Weindenfeld & Nicolson.
Teams.