Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2504378 French Philology and Culture | OT | 3 | 0 |
2504393 English and French Studies | OT | 0 | 0 |
2504393 English and French Studies | OT | 3 | 0 |
2504393 English and French Studies | OT | 4 | 0 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
There is none.
This subject is a part of the nuclear for the academic training of French Studies students. It is therefore a compulsory subject. In this subject which is included in the topic French Linguistics, the aim goal is to give the student the means necessary to linguistic analysis of present-day written and oral documents in French. With these analyses it is aimed to contribute to the improvement of the linguistic and textual competences of the students when they express themselves in French but also in Spanish or when they translate from French to Spanish or from Spanish to French and, also, it is aimed to give an academic training which permits to the students to face an effective learning of French as a foreign language (FFL).
Linguistic comparison: definition, approaches, applications
Functional approach of languages: languages as a problem-solving system.
Invariant and variation. Main linguistic functions. Some examples.
Panchronical approach of languages: the grammaticalization process.
In this subject, the training will be directed by means of:- Master class with TIC and collective discussion- Interventions in class- Collective analysis of linguistic phenomena The exchanges in class will be teacher-student and student-student. The teacher will allocate approximately 15 minutes of a class to allow the students to answer the evaluation survey of the teaching performance of the topic. Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master class with TIC and collective discussion; Analysis of lexical, semantic and pragmatic phenomena | 53 | 2.12 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Preparation of oral and written presentations, tutorials | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Texts reading, exercises | 68 | 2.72 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
Assessment will be continous. It will include all the tasks done during the semester (exams, exercises).- Active participation in class in discussions 3- Active participation in class in discussions- Written or oral exercises- Partial exams on the topics approached. Assessment will will include all the work done during the term, the exams (which number will vary depending on the rhythm in which the program will be completed) as well the exercises done during all the term. Mid-term exams will be corrected in class and students will be able to ask any doubt about assessment. In the final exam, a date of revision will be fixed.- If a student has not done any of the mid-term exams, (s)he will not be assessed.- will only be avalaible to students who, having done the continuous assessment, have failed.Remedial exam But they will have not right to remedial exam if their average is inferior to 3,5 /10 or if they have not done at least 2/3 of the required tasks. Tasks not done will not be remediated (in this case the assessment will be 0/10) or the activities done in course. If the student has not got an average of pass, he will have to do a final exam including all the topics. In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB's virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives. Plagiarism: Total or partial plagiarism of any exercise will be automatically failed (0) of the plagiarised exercise. TO PLAGIARISE is copying from non identified sources from a text, even if it is one single phrase, which is appropriated by someone who is not the real author (it includes copying phrases or Internet passages and adding them without modification to the text which is presented as one's own). It is a seriousoffense. In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, , regardless of anythe student will be given a zero for this activity disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in of theassessment activities same subject, the student will be given a zero as the grade for this subject.final Particular cases: Students whose mother tongue is French will have to achieve the same assessment conditions than the rest of students. Students are the exclusive responsible of monitoring formative and assessment activities.
UNIQUE ASSESSMENT:
- a written exam (70%)
- an oral examn (30%)
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Participation in collective analyses | 25% | 4.5 | 0.18 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
partial exam 1 | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
partial exam 2 | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 8, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
partial exam 3 | 25% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 1, 12, 2, 4, 3, 5, 14, 6, 13, 7, 10, 11, 9, 15, 16, 17 |
Creissels, Denis (2006), Syntaxe générale. Une introduction typologique 2. La phrase.Paris : Hermes Lavoisier.
Creissels, Denis (2006), Une introduction typologique 1. Catégories et constructions.Paris : Hermes Lavoisier.
Feuillet, Jack (2006), Introduction à la typologie linguistique. Paris : Honoré Champion.
Kilani-Schoch, Marianne (1988), Introduction à la morphologie naturelle. Berne : Peter Lang.
Lazard, Gilbert (1994), L'actance. Paris : PUF.
Lazard, Gilbert (2001), Études de linguistique générale. Leuven-Paris : Peeters.
Lazard, Gilbert et Moyse-Faurie, Claire (éds.) (2005), Linguistique typologique. Villeneuve d'Ascq : Presses Septentrion, coll. « Sens et structures ».
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos (1991). Curso universitario de lingüística general. Tomo I: Teoría de la gramática y sintaxis general. Madrid: Síntesis.
Muller, Claude (2002), Les Bases de la syntaxe, Bordeaux : Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Seiler, Hansjakob (1988), The Dimension of Participation. Función 7. Guadalajara: Centro de Investigación de Lenguas Indígenas.
Seiler, Hansjakob (2002), Language Universals Research: A Synthesis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.
Bibliography will be completed along the term.
There is none