Assessment

This subject/module does not incorporate single assessment.

The evaluation of the subject is specified as follows:

• 2 practices with an eminently practical character (voluntary), of concrete questions exposed in the agenda. Their weight in the final grade is 10% each (20% total) (individuals)
• 1 exercise of a section of a strategic tourism plan to present in poster format (10%) and written report (20%). It is considered as a final assessment test (in group)
• 1 oral presentation of the strategic plan project: 20% (assessable individually and in groups)
• 1 field trip, and the related previous preparation: 20% + 10% (in a group)

The practical activities are optional (but cannot be recovered if they have not been presented, it is explained in detail below).

These practical activities have an optional character (but they cannot be recovered if they have not been submitted).

On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

Requirements for evaluation (1st call)

• To obtain a minimum grade of 5 in the written plan, in order to average with the other parts of the assessment. In case of not fulfilling this requirement, this note cannot be compensated with another and it will be submitted to the recovery process.
• There is no obligation of a minimum score in the practical activities and the one obtained will be added to the others for the final grade of the subject. This means that they cannot be done, with the risk, however, that after the rest of the notes are not enough to pass the subject. Keep in mind that the optionality of the practices has a "price": they will be delivered within the established period (to be announced at the beginning of the course) and when it has finished they will not be admitted.

Requirements for recovery:

• Failure to complete the written report will mean that the student must submit to the recovery. That is, in spite of the "mathematical" possibility that the student passes having delivered the practicesand attended all the classroom sessions, it will not be so without such proof.
• In case that the minimum grade required in the written report is not obtained, the affected person will need to submit to the recovery. The rest of the notes will be saved for the final grade.
• As for the practical activities, only the recovery (or improvement of grade) of one will be accepted, as long as it has been delivered within the established term throughout the semester. That is to say, in the case of practices, re-evaluation does not imply being able to deliver one that has not been done before.
• On the other hand, no other "alternative" evaluation mechanism is foreseen (presentation of a paper, reading reviews, etc.).
• The oral presentation and the field trip cannot be re-evaluated or recovered.

According to UAB regulations, in order to participate in the recovery process, a minimum grade in the average of the subject must have been obtained. This rating will equal or exceed 3.5. (These conditions are adapted to the regulations on the evaluation of the UAB in Article 112. The recovery http://www.uab.cat/doc/Modificacio_normativa_academica_CG120717).

Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 1/3 of the assessment items.

Plagiarism

The copying or plagiarism of material, both in the case of works and in the case of exams, constitute a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero to the activity. In the case of recidivism, the entire subject will be suspended.
Let's remember that a "copy" is considered a work that reproduces all or most of the work of one or the other company /a. "Plagiarism" is the fact of presenting all or part of a text of an author as its own, without mentioningthe sources, be on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at:
http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html.

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

Procedure for Reviewing Grades Awarded