Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500244 East Asian Studies | OT | 4 | 2 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
To take this subject, students must have passed the following subjects: "Introduction to Political Science and International Relations"; "East Asian Politics", and "International Relations of East Asia". Specifically, this subject requires prior knowledge of the conceptual and methodological tools of the disciplines of Political Science and International Relations.
The aim of this subject is to interpret and understand the main debates that shape East Asia’s domestic and international political realities. Making use of the conceptual and methodological tools of the Political Science and International Relations disciplines, students will learn to think critically about the region’s political reality.
The subject is structured around several case studies on East Asian politics and international relations. The topics will deal with the domestic and foreign policy of Japan, China and South Korea, focusing on projects related to the key concepts of international relations such as public diplomacy, hard power, soft power or nation branding. Some of the specific cases to be analyzed will be: the public diplomacy programs implemented by the diplomatic missions of Japan, China and South Korea; the place of Okinawa and its culture in Japan-US political relations; the impact of Hallyu on the conflict between the two Koreas; the intraregional competition between Japan, China and South Korea based on martial arts as intangible heritage of UNESCO, among others.
The various case studies will be addressed through suggested readings and active discussions. The teaching team will indicate the theoretical and methodological lines to be followed in each case study. Students will be expected to participate actively.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Participation in discussions about the suggested topics | 35 | 1.4 | 7, 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 13, 16, 14, 15, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Presentations | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 8, 9, 4, 11, 17, 16, 14, 15 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Critical comment on readings | 20 | 0.8 | 7, 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 12, 11, 16, 14, 15, 6 |
Reading assignments | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 14, 15, 6 |
Continuous assessment
Students must provide evidence of their progress by completing various tasks and tests. These activities are detailed in the table at the end of this section of the Study Guide.
Review
When publishing final marks prior to recording them on students' transcripts, the lecturer will provide written notification of a date and time for reviewing assessment activities. Students must arrange reviews in agreement with the lecturer.
Missed/failed assessment activities
Students may retake assessment activities they have failed or compensate for any they have missed, provided that those they have actually performed account for a minimum of 66.6% (two thirds) of the subject's final mark and that they have a weighted average mark of at least 3.5.
Classification as "not assessable"
In the event of the assessment activities a student has performed accounting for just 25% or less of the subject's final mark, their work will be classified as "not assessable" on their transcript.
Misconduct in assessment activities
Students who engage in misconduct (plagiarism, copying, personation, etc.) in an assessment activity will receive a mark of “0” for the activity in question. In the case of misconduct in more than one assessment activity, the student involved will be given a final mark of “0” for the subject. Assessment activities in which irregularities have occurred (e.g. plagiarism, copying, impersonation) are excluded from recovery.
Single assessment
This subject may be assessed under the single assessment system in accordance with the terms established in the academic regulations of the UAB and the assessment criteria of the Faculty of Translation and Interpreting.
Students must make anonline request within the period established by the faculty and send a copy to the teacher responsible for the subject, for the record.
Single assessment will be carried out in person on one day during week 16 or 17 of the semester. The Academic Management Office will publish the exact date and time on the faculty website.
On the day of the single assessment, teaching staff will ask the student for identification, which should be presented as a valid identification document with a recent photograph (student card, DNI/NIE or passport).
Single assessment activities
The final grade for the subject will be calculated according to the following percentages:
-Short-answer test: 30%
-Developmental test: 30%
-Individual written assignment: 40%
Grade revision and resit procedures for the subject are the same as those for continual assessment. See the section above in this study guide.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group presentation | 30% | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 3, 10, 11, 13, 17, 16, 14, 15, 6 |
Individual written assignment | 40% | 25 | 1 | 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 3, 10, 12, 11, 13, 17, 16, 14, 15, 6 |
Short-answer test | 30% | 10 | 0.4 | 7, 1, 2, 8, 9, 5, 4, 3, 10, 12, 11, 13, 17, 16, 14, 15, 6 |
Basic bibliography
-Acharya, Amitav & Buzan, Barry (Eds.). Non-Western International Relations Theory. Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. New York, London: Routledge, 2010.
-Bowman, P. (2020). In authentic relations: traditional Asian martial arts, east and west. En: Hong, F. y Zhouxiang, L. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Sport in Asia. (pp. 11-19). Routledge.
-Breslin, S. (2010). Handbook of China's international relations. London: Routledge.
-Connors, M. K., Davison, R., & Dosch, J. (2018). The New Global Politics of the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge.
-Cull, N. J. (2019). Public Diplomacy: Foundations for Global Engagement in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
-Daly, P. (2012). Traditional Chinese Martial Arts and the Transmission of Intangible Cultural Heritage. En: Daly, P., and Winter, T. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Heritage in Asia (pp. 350-363). Routledge.
-Hijino, K.V.L., y Vogt, G. (2021). Identity politics in Okinawan elections: the emergence of regional populism, Japan Forum, 33:1, 50-76.
-Kawashima, N., y Hye-Kyung L. Asian Cultural Flows. Springer, 2018.
-Kerr, G. H. (1958). Okinawa, the History of an Island People. C. E. Tuttle Company.
-Kim, Y. (Ed.). (2019). South Korean Popular Culture and North Korea. Routledge.
-Kotler, P. (1998). El marketing de las naciones. Barcelona: Paidos.
-Lim, S. (Ed.). (2022). South Korean Popular Culture in the Global Context: Beyond the Fandom. Routledge.
-Mason, R. (2023). Layered Security on Okinawa: Reconciling International, National, and Subnational Narratives. En K. Nakatsuji (Ed.), Japan's Security Policy (pp. 117-139). (Politics in Asia). Routledge.
-McCormack, G., y Norimatsu, S. O. (2012). Resistant islands: Okinawa confronts Japan and the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
-Melgar, L. (2010). Diplomacia pública: la gestión de la imagen-país. El modelo español, Madrid: MAEC.
-Nye, J. S. (2005). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
-Nye, J. S. (2012). The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
-Park, S. Y., y Ryu, S. Y. (Eds.) (2020). Traditional Martial Arts as Intangible Cultural Heritage. ICHCAP-ICM-UNESCO.
-Smits, G. (2019). Maritime Ryukyu, 1050–1650. University of Hawaii Press.
No specific software will be used.