Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2504212 English Studies | FB | 1 | 2 |
No prerequisites
The course presents the main debates and conceptions of language from a philosophical perspective
The course is divided into four main sections: what is philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of literature and an update to this century
1) What is philosophy?
1.1. Philosophy as the territory of reason and argumentation
1.2. Philosophy as dialogue
1.3. Philosophy between science and art
2) An approach to the philosophy of language
2.1 The formal perspective of language. The first Wittgenstein
2.2 The embodied conception of language. Lakoff and Johnson's theory of metaphors
2.3 Philosophy of everyday language: the second Wittgenstein.
3) An approach to the philosophy of literature
3.1 The conception of language in Eastern thought. Daoism and Zen
3.2 Basic concepts of Gadamer's hermeneutical theory
4) Current panorama of the philosophy of language and literature
The methodology of the course combines presentations of the theory by teachers and participatory activities in small groups in the form of a seminar.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes | 35 | 1.4 | 8, 2, 4, 5, 6 |
Seminars | 11 | 0.44 | 2, 3, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
tutorship | 22 | 0.88 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Case studies | 31 | 1.24 | 8, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Readings of the recommended bibliography | 44 | 1.76 | 2, 5, 6, 7 |
The evaluation method will consist of three tests - Two will be short answer individual written tests or equivalent (multiple choice test). The third must be different, such as an exam to take home and return after 48 hours or an oral presentation. The first test will be used to evaluate topics 1 and 2, the second for topic 3 and the third for topic 4. The tests will be done once the topics associated with each of them have been completed. Each test will be worth a maximum of 10 points and there will be a global average obtained from the sum of the results of the three tests ((P1 + P2 + P3) / 3) that gives a minimum of 5 points to pass the course. It is necessary to carry out the 3 tests to pass.
For oral presentations, a minimum of three people per group is recommended. The presentations will be of a maximum of 15 minutes and will be made in substitution of the master classes.
A maximum of three days will be reserved in order to carry out these exhibitions.
Reassessments: students who have taken at least two of the three tests, and have failed some or all of the tests, or seek to improve their grade, may either re-examine those tests that they have not taken or that have failed, or take a single multiple choice test to evaluate the three parts. To raise the grade, you must take the exam of the three re-evaluation tests, keeping the mark after the one obtained during the re-evaluation.
Students who have not taken a minimum of two tests will be considered as 'not evaluable'.
In the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the rating of an evaluation act, this evaluation act will be scored 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event that there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple Choice test or equivalent 2 | 40% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 8, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Multiple choice test or equivalent | 40% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 8, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Written paper or oral presentation | 20% | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1, 8, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Barthold, Lauren Swayne, 2010, Gadamer’s Dialectical Hermeneutics, Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2010.
Carroll, N. (2003). The philosophy of horror: Or, paradoxes of the heart. Routledge.
Gadamer, H. G. 1989, Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edn. (1st English edn, 1975, trans. by W, Glen-Doepel, ed. by John Cumming and Garret Barden),
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
Midgley, M. (2018). What is Philosophy For?. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pears, D. (1986) Ludwig Wittgenstein. Harvard University Press.
Puett, M., & Gross-Loh, C. (2016). The path: What Chinese philosophers can teach us about the good life. Simon and Schuster.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/
Thacker, E. (2011). In the dust of this planet: Horror of philosophy vol. 1 (Vol. 1). John Hunt Publishing.
Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1961, D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trans.), New York: Humanities Press.
_ (1953) Philosophical Investigations , G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell
No specific software needed