Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2504216 Contemporary History, Politics and Economics | OB | 2 | 2 |
Those of the obligatory subjects of the degree in Contemporary History, Politics and Economics.
The aims of the subject are:
- Present the main historical issues related to gender perspective in the Late Modern Period
- Provide the students with the key elements to place gender perspective in the analysis of the Late Modern Period
- Provide the students with useful sources in order to develop their cognitive skills regarding the relationships between genders and history, politics and economics
The teaching methodology and the training activities can be diverse and will be evaluated according to the teacher's opinion. For Assistance to theoretical classes
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Theoretical classes | 20.4 | 0.82 | 21, 4, 9, 7, 18 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Flipped classrooms | 30.6 | 1.22 | 1, 3, 11, 21, 4, 6, 2, 10, 7, 14, 18, 24 |
Tutorials | 15 | 0.6 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study | 75 | 3 |
*The subject will be evaluated by applying the following procedures:
- Group wor and a flipped classroom in group (mandatory to qualify for recovery): 35%
- Individual assignment: 30%
- Writing exams: 35%
* All the subject matter of the course contained in the explanations in class and, where appropriate, compulsory readings that can be indicated during the course will be evaluated.
* The dates of completion of the tests in the classroom and delivery of work will be communicated to the students at the beginning of the course.
* At the time of completion of each evaluation activity, the faculty will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date of review of the grades.
Recovery
Revision
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam | Exam (35%) | 1.5 | 0.06 | 19, 11, 21, 9, 8, 17, 18, 15 |
Group Practices | 1 paper/seminary (35%) | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 3, 20, 12, 10, 13, 7, 14, 24, 23, 22 |
Individual Practices | 1 paper (30%) | 4.5 | 0.18 | 19, 20, 4, 6, 2, 14, 16, 5 |
• Anderson, Bonnie S. & Zinsser, Judith P (1988). A History of Their Own: Women in Europe from Prehistory to the Present, New York: Harper & Row.
• Anzaldúa, Gloria E. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
• Bacchi, Carol, L. and Eveline, Joan (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory, E-Book: University of Adelaide, pp. 111-138.
• Beckwith, Karen (2000). "Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective". European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431-468.
• Beckwith, Karen (2005) 'A Common Language of Gender?', Politics & Gender, 1 (1), 128-137.
• Connell, Raewyn (1990). "The State, Gender, and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal". Theory and Society 19 (5): 507-544.
• Connell, Raewyn W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press,
• Dahlerup, Drude (ed) (2006). Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge.
• Davis, Angela (1981). Women, Race and Class, Random House
• Duby, Georges & Perrot, Michelle, (1992). A History of Women in the West, vol. 5, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
• Federici, Silvia (1975). Wages against Housework. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
• Htun, Mala (2005). "What It Means to Study Gender and the State". Politics & Gender, 1 (1): 157-166.
• hooks, bell (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press.
• Kantola, Johana, ed. (2006). Feminists Theorize the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave
• Karamessini, Maria & Jill Rubery, eds (2014). Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality. London & New York: Routledge IAFFE Advances in Feminist Economics.
• Krook, Mona L. & Fiona Mackay (2011). Gender, Politics and Institutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Krook, Mona L., Susan Franceschet & Jennifer M. Piscopo (2012). The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press
• Lovenduski, Joni (2005). Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Mazur, Amy (2002). Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
• McBride Stetson, Dorothy M. & Amy G. Mazur (1995). Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Millett, Kate (1969). Sexual Politics. Granada Publishing, chapter 2 "Theory of Sexual Politics".
• Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (1984). "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discuourses". Boundary 2. 12:3-13:1. pp. 333-358
• Nash, Mary (2004). Mujeres en el mundo. Historia, retos y movimientos, Madrid: Alianza.
• Offen, Karen (2000). European Feminisms, 1700-1950. A Political History, Stanford University Press.
• Pateman, Carole (1989). The Disorder of Women. Stanford: Stamford University Press (Ch. 8: "The patriarcal welfare state").
• Phillips, Anne (1995). The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity and Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Scott, Joan Wallach (1986). "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis". The American Historical Review. 91 (5): 1053–1075.
• Waylen, Georgina, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola & S. Laurel Weldon (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
None