Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500891 Nursing | OT | 4 | 2 |
The main theme of the whole subject will be to evaluate the nursing finalist competences. In order to do so, the competency levels defined by Patricia Benner (1987) are taken as a reference, after studying the care practice of expert and novel nurses that she interviewed to study the differences of the same clinical contingency, following the model of acquisition of nursing skills. Dreyfus & Dreyfus (1979, 1982).
According to Juvé, et al. (2007), these are the peculiarities of this model:
For his part, Benner considers that it is with practice that nurses acquire a clinical wisdom as a conglomerate of basic practical knowledge and untreated theoretical knowledge. This wisdom goes through the "beginner to expert" process of Dreyfus & Dreyfus:
Beginner. Having no experience in the situations that arise, the nurse acts with rigidity, mechanically and very aware of the rules. He does not know how to act within the unforeseen: "The behavior marked by the rules, typical of a beginner, is extremely limited and inflexible. The core of the difficulty lies in the fact that as he has no experience in the situation or situation he is facing, it is necessary to give him some guidelines to guide his performance "(Benner, 1987). Nursing students fall into this category, although this competence can not be limited to students, this author considers that every nurse who passes to a new service of which she has no practical experience is forced to retreat to this category until she feel familiar (Cònsul M., 2010) It is intended that at the end of the internship period the student can demonstrate the competences of a beginner nurse.
Contents of the finalist competences that have to be used in external clinical practices in childhood and adolescence.
To take care of the children, the students will have to carry out the following activities:
To take care of the children, the students will have to carry out the following activities:
Facilitate the adaptation / coping process:
Assess, diagnose and address changing situations in sick children admitted:
Help the patient (0-18 years old) and / or his family to comply with the treatment and make him a participant:
Contribute to guarantee safety and the care process:
Work as a team and adapt to a changing environment:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
CLINICAL CASE SEMINARS | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 5, 7, 13, 8, 10, 12, 15, 14, 16 |
Type: Supervised | |||
PRACTICUM WITH GUIDELINES | 283 | 11.32 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, 7, 6, 13, 8, 10, 9, 12, 15, 14, 16 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
daily elaboration | 6 | 0.24 |
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
The final grade of the subject corresponds to the weighted average between the note of the external clinical practices (PCE) and the grade obtained from the elaboration of the reflective learning diary and in the clinical cases seminars, with the following weighting:
- 60%: clinical practices.
- 40%: clinical cases seminars and reflective diary.
IMPORTANT:
EXTERNAL PRACTICES (PE) (60%):
Attendance to all the hours scheduled in the teaching calendar and in the shift and assigned time is mandatory.
Attendance sheet: Through the daily signing of this document, the nurse responsible for each Student will confirm the schedule of each day. This document will serve as proof of the number of practice hours.
The only person responsible for the document will be the student. It will have to be updated at all times, and the student will be responsible for its information being truthful. The document will be submitted to the nursing associate teacher at the end of the practicum and uploaded to the Moodle.
This document may be asked at any given time by those responsible for the subject.
It is mandatory to go through the whole practicum period programmed on the teaching calendar, no matter the schedule of the practicum.
a) Justified absences in the following situations:
1. Family death
2. Specialized medical visit.
3. Acute illness.
4. Driving license test.
5. Official university test.
6. Official language tests.
b) Non-justified absences:
Those that are not on the previous list and are not authorized by the subject coordination. The student will write about them on the follow-up sheet and will make up for those hours in however way the teacher finds convenient. At the end of the practicum 1 point will be subtracted from the final mark for every day of absence.
c) Strikes, demonstrations:
Taking into account the student’s rights, those students who want to take part in a strike will need to inform their teacher and the nursing service previously, as well as writing about it on the follow-up sheet. That day will be considered non retrievable.
d) Non-justified and non-notified absence:
It might entail failing the subject.
e) Lateness:
Being late more than 5 times during the practicum might entail failing the subject.
Absences must be communicated to the associate teacher as early on as possible and the practicum department so that the learning process stays unaffected and new days can be chosen the make up for the lost hours.
Attendance to the simulation is mandatory and cannot coincide with the schedule assigned to the practicum. Not attending this session will be penalized subtracting 1 point from the final mark.
In all justified absences, the corresponding proof is mandatory.
Continuous and formative evaluation:
Approximately halfway through the internship period, the responsible teacher, together with the nurse, will prepare a summary of the student's progress and discuss it with the student.
This evaluation, of a formative nature, will summarize:
- the level of achievement of the objectives
- the strengths to be highlighted
- the weak points to improve, with the pertinent recommendations.
The student will also take care of his self-assessment and comment with the teacher.
Final evaluation:
At the end of the clinical practice period, the nurse will prepare a final report on the competences reached by the student.
In the same way, the student will carry out his self-evaluation and will comment with the nurse and the teacher.
In order to pass the subject, all the competences of the evaluation document of the clinical practices must be approved with a minimum grade of 5 (a grade lower than 5 in some competition will suppose not to overcome the practices).
*Attendance is mandatory in every shift that is programmed. Those absences that are not justified will be made up for during the period programmed for the clinical practicum when authorized by the teacher responsible.
DAILY REFLECTIVE LEARNING AND CLINICAL CASE SEMINARS (40%):
Continuous and formative evaluation
Will be evaluated:
- The elaboration, presentation and discussion of weekly activities that arise within the context of clinical practice: (reflexive diary and other activities).
- The evidences that support the contributions, the bibliography used and the fluid, coherent and adequate expression in written form.
- The ability to work in groups, respect for the plurality of ideas, people and situations and the ability to integrate into the healthcare team.
Finalist evaluation
On the last day of thesessions, the student will deliver to his teacher the activities corresponding to the reflective learning diary, in electronic format through the Moodle.
This document must be written following the rules established for the submission of papers.
The completion of work and cases is mandatory.
In order to pass the subject, the seminars must be approved with a minimum grade of 5.
They will be considered not delivered, (not evaluable), the works not presented within the deadlines established by the professor responsible for the subject.
Those that do not meet the criteria established by the teacher responsible for the subject will be considered as not delivered (not evaluable).
Attendance at case discussion sessions is mandatory.
This section will be considered not approved if the student does not attend more than one session.
In order to pass the subject, the student must be approved with a minimum grade of 5 (a grade lower than 5 in some competition will suppose not to overcome the practices).
OBTAINING THE FINAL GRADE
The lack of responsibility of the student is reflected in the final grade of the subject.
The sanctions that are applied are described in the Norm of the Nursing Practicum document:
www.uab.cat/medicina within the section Grades: Nursing; Practicum
According to agreement 4.4 of the Governing Council 17/11/2010 of the evaluation regulations, the qualifications will be:
Grade F = Fail (from 0 to 4.9).
Grade E = Pass (from 5.0 to 6.9)
Grade B = Good (from 7.0 to 8.9)
Grade A = Merit (from 9.0 to 10).
Grade A+ = Honour distinction (will be awarded to those students who have obtained the best grades totals greater than or equal to 9, within the cup of 5% of students enrolled in the subject).
According to the regulation on permanence regime in the official degree and master studies of the Autonomous University of Barcelona, students who do not provide sufficient evidence of evaluation will be assigned as non- evaluable.
* Criteria to assign not evaluable:
1. Failure to achieve the hours established in this guide.
2. Failure to submit papers within the established deadlines.
Private cases
The treatment of special situations and particular cases will be assessed in the committee formed for that purpose.
NOTE:
Any sign of academic dishonesty, such as plagiarism of document manipulation, as well as any discriminatory, violent or disrespectful attitudes towards patients, teachers or co-workers will be elevated to the practicum commission, which will analyse the situation and act accordingly.
An assessment commission can be created at any given time in order to assess special situations that do not find an answer in this guide or in those documents published on the practicum website.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Narrative records: portfolios and seminars | 40% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 5, 3, 7, 6, 13, 8, 10, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16 |
On the hospital practices evaluations | 60% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, 7, 13, 8, 10, 12, 15, 14, 16 |
Cònsul i Giribet, Maria. Ensenyar i aprendre infermeria amb un currículum integrat per mitjà de l’aprenentatge basat en problemes. El cas de l’escola universitària d’infermeria Vall d’Hebron. Tesis doctoral. Facultat de Pedagogia –Departament de Didàctica i Organització Educativa. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona; 2010.
Benner P. Práctica progresiva en enfermería. Manual de comportamiento profesional. Enfermería y Sociedad. Barcelona: Grijalbo; 1987.
Bulechek G, Butcher H, McCloskey J. Clasificación de intervenciones de enfermería (NIC). 7ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2018
Dreyfus HL. What computer can’t do: the milits of artificial inteligence.New York: Harper & Row; 1979.
Dreyfus SE “Formal models vs. Humans situational understanding:inherent limitations on the modeling of business expertise”. Office: Tegnology and People. 1982; 1:133-155.
Herdman TH, editor. NANDA International. Diagnósticos Enfermeros: definiciones y clasificación 2015 2017. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2015.
ICS (2020). 3clics: Atenció primària basada en l'evidència. [Internet]. 2008 [citat 11 juliol 2020];12. Disponible a:https://www.ics.gencat.cat/3clics
ICS. (2010). Manual de procediments d’infermeria. [Internet]. 2008 [citat 11 juliol 2020];12. Disponible a:https://elenfermerodelpendiente.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/manual_infermeria_2010.pdf.
Johnson M, Moorhead S, Bulechek G, Butcher H, Maas M, Swanson E. Vínculos de NOC y NIC a NANDA-I y diagnósticos médicos. Soporte para el razonamiento crítico y la calidad de los cuidados. 3ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier;2012.
Juvé M.E.,Huguet M, Monterde D, Sanmartín MJ, cuevas B et all (2007 a). Marco teórico y conceptual para la definición y evaluación de competencias del profesional de enfermería en el àmbito hospitalario. Nursing 2007;
25(4):56-61.
Luis MT. Los diagnósticos enfermeros: revisión crítica y guía práctica. 2ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier-Masson; 2013
Moorhead S, Johnson M, Maas M. Clasificación de resultados de enfermería (NOC). 4ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2018
Rauner F. El conocimiento práctico y la competencia de acción en la profesión. Revista Europea de Formación Profesional. 2007; 40:59-73.
Nanda Internacional. Diagnósticos enfermeros. Definiciones y clasifiación 2018-2020. Madrid:Elsevier; 2019.
Schön, A.D. (1989) La formación de profesionales reflexivos. Barcelona. Paidos.
Schon, D. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos. Hacia un nuevo diseño de la formación y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Madrid: Piados MEC.