Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500260 Social Education | OT | 3 | 2 |
2500260 Social Education | OT | 4 | 1 |
2500261 Education Studies | OT | 4 | 1 |
2500798 Primary Education | OT | 4 | 0 |
It is recommended to have completed the subject "The teaching-learning process" (GPE-GES) or "Teaching Methods and Curriculum Development" (GEP).
The teaching strategies for the training of adults are framed within a more general process that is specifically located in the teaching and learning processes; determining, from the differential education, the axes of action in training programs keep on.
The objectives are the following:
The differential didactics in relation to adults
Approaches and models in the education of adults.
The didactic relationship in the education of adults. Motivation and learning.
Educational strategies and adult education.
The forms of action in adult education and guidance for learning.
The methodological approach of the subject starts by focusing the process activity on the student's learning. For this, the student must be responsible, active and autonomous throughout the process, being the teacher's mission to help and guide him in this task.
The teaching staff:
1) will orient and/or provide the theoretical reference;
2) support and guide the student at all times, guiding for search or providing (as deemed) information, resources, ... necessary to facilitate learning;
3) ensure the autonomous learning of the student, proposing different teaching / learning activities, under the principle of methodological multivariance.
All this should facilitate the essential involvement and active participation by the student in their learning process. In this context, academic tutoring become a fundamental part of the work methodology.
Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public Health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVED-19.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom activity in large group. Practices and activities and master class occasionally. | 45 | 1.8 | 7, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 6, 30, 29, 31, 33, 32, 11, 10, 8, 9, 13, 16, 12, 15, 14, 21, 18, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 34, 19 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised work. Elaboration in group of practices and other activities. | 30 | 1.2 | 7, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 6, 30, 29, 31, 33, 32, 11, 10, 8, 9, 13, 16, 12, 23, 24, 15, 14, 21, 18, 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 34, 19 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Self-training. Reading of documents, search of information, study and preparation of evaluation tests, etc. | 75 | 3 | 7, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 30, 29, 31, 33, 32, 11, 10, 8, 15, 21, 18, 20, 22, 34, 19 |
The evaluation will be carried out throughout the course, through the activities shown in the evaluation activities grid.
If this is the case (according to the teacher's choice), the individual exam will be done in the last part of the subject. If necessary and if the ordinary test has been done, the recovery exam can be done after. The grade of the recovery will be a maximum of 5.
If this is the case (according to the teacher's choice), the critical conceptual map will be delivered the second week of November; if necessary, can be modified and repeated only once (obviously only if the ordinary task has been done). The maximum recovery grade will be a 5.
The task/block "Design of a training action for adults" should be aimed at a specific group (variables such as gender, age, social-labor-cultural conditionings, specific educational needs, etc. may be considered), will be delivered in the December-January period. If necessary, can be modified and repeated only once (obviously only if the ordinary practice has been done). The maximum recovery grade will be a 5.
The blocks/tasks "development of a formative action for adults" in the classroom and "other classroom activities (group assessment, assessments instruments, reflective self-assessment, etc.)" will be developed throughout the course and are NOT recoverable.
In order to pass the subject, each one of the 4 blocks of evaluative activities that structure the subject must be approved (minimum of 5) (design of formative action, development of formative action, other activities, examination/ critical conceptual map).
Throughout the course, the following will be taken into account for the evaluation of the students:
- their involvement, participation, collaboration, ... in the proposed activities, in the course of the sessions, with the group of colleagues, etc.
- good communicative competence (linguistic correction, fluent and correct expression (oral and written), high comprehension of academic texts, etc), and correct use of sources, notes, textual citations, bibliographic references, etc... following the APA regulations; an activity can be returned (not evaluated) or suspended if the teaching staff considers that it does not meet these requirements.
Class attendance is mandatory. The student must reach a minimum of 80% attendance in order to be evaluated, otherwise it will be considered as "not evaluable".
Non-realization, non-presentation, etc. of the assigned activities will be considered as "not evaluable", with the consequences that this implies in the final qualification of the subject.
If copy or plagiarism is detected in work, practices, activities, exams, etc. a 0 will be obtained in the final qualification of the subject (whether it is individual or group, in the latter case all the members of the group will have a 0), not being able to recover.
The methodology and the evaluation can be modified according to the restrictions to the attendance that the health authoritiesimpose.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Design and development of a training action for adults (group work). | 50% (30% design + 20% development) | 0 | 0 | 7, 3, 5, 4, 6, 33, 32, 11, 10, 8, 9, 13, 16, 12, 23, 24, 15, 14, 21, 17, 18, 20, 22, 27, 28, 34, 19 |
Other individual classroom activities (group assessment, assessments instruments, reflective self-assessment, etc.). | 15% | 0 | 0 | 7, 2, 1, 33, 32, 8, 9, 12, 21, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, 34, 19 |
Theoretical examination or creation of a conceptual map (critical) of the mandatory reading documents (option according to teaching criteria) (individual) | 35% | 0 | 0 | 3, 5, 4, 30, 29, 31, 33, 32, 11, 10, 8, 15 |
Álvarez Rojo, V. (2002). (Coord.) Diseño y evaluación de programas. Madrid: Eos Universitaria,
Barrera-Corominas, A. y Suarez, C.I. (2015). La educación de personas adultas, en J. Gairín (Coord.). Manual integrado de acción tutorial. Cartago, Costa Rica: Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica (pp. 27-64). Disponible en: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/143647
Bernal, A. (Coord) (2019). Formación continua. Madrid: Síntesis.
Benet, N. (1979). Estilos de enseñanza y progreso de los alumnos. Madrid: Morata.
Briasco, I. (2009). Hacia una didáctica inclusiva en la educación de adultos. Decisio, 23, 67-72.
Cabero, J. (1990). Análisis de medios de enseñanza. Sevilla: Alfar
Cabrera, F. (2000). Evaluación de la formación. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Díaz, F. y Hernández, G. (2002). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Una visión constructivista. México: Mc Graw Hill.
Bolívar, A. (2008). Didáctica y Currículum: de la modernidad a la postmodernidad. Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe
Fernández, T. y Ponce, L. (2016). Elaboración, gestión y evaluación de proyectos sociales (vol 2). Madrid: Pirámide.
Fernández, T. y Ponce, L. (2016). Planificación y actuación estratégica de proyectos sociales. Intervención social y programación (vol 1). Madrid: Pirámide.
Ferrández, A., Gairín, J. y Tejada, J. (1990). El proceso de aprendizaje en el adulto. Madrid: Diagrama.
Ferrández, A. y Puente, J.M. (Dres.) (1992). Educación de personas adultas (volumen 1 y 2). Madrid: Diagrama
Gairín, J. (1997). La planificación y el desarrollo de planes, en J. Gairín y A. Ferrández (Coords.) Planificación y gestión de instituciones de formación (pp. 151-201) Barcelona: Praxis.
Gairín, J. (Coord.) (2015). Manual integrado de acción tutorial. Cartago, Costa Rica: Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.
Gijón, J. (coord.) (2016). Formación por competencias y competencias para la formación. Perspectivas desde la investigación. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
Gimeno Sacristán, J. y Perez Gómez, A. (1989). La enseñanza. Su teoría y su práctica. Madrid: Akal.
Gimeno Sacristán, J. y Perez Gómez, A. (1992). Comprender y transformar la enseñanza. Madrid: Morata.
Gimeno, J. (2001). Educar y convivir enla cultura global: las exigencias de la ciudadanía. Madrid: Morata.
Imbernón, F. (2016). Diseño, desarrollo y evaluación de procesos de formación. Madrid: Síntesis.
Jurado, P. (2006). Condicionamientos en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje, en J. Tejada y V. Giménez (Eds.), Formación de formadores. Escenario Aula (pp. 647-701). Madrid: Thomson-Paraninfo.
Leirman, W. et al. (1991). La educación de adultos como proceso. Madrid: Editorial Popular.
Letelier, M.E. (2009). La Evaluación de Aprendizajes de Personas Jóvenes y Adultas. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 2(1), 147-161.
López-Barajas, E. y Sarrate, M.L. (coord.) (2002). La educación de personas adultas. Reto de nuestro tiempo. Madrid: Dykinson.
Marland, M. (1982): El arte de enseñar. Madrid: Morata.
Mas, O. (2007). Las necesidades formativas de las personas mayores de 50 años. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 44/1, 1-15.
Mas, O., Espona, B., Quesada, C. y García, N. (2012). La Formació als Centres de Treball als Cicles Formatius de Formació Professional. Tendències de desenvolupament i factors d’èxit per l’eficàcia. Temps Educació, 44, 279-298.
Mas, O., Olmos, P. y Salvà, F. (2017). Programas de formación profesional de nivel 1 (PFI): un estudio de caso desde la perspectiva docente. Qurriculum, 30, 103-124.
Merino, J.V. (2000). Programas de animación sociocultural. Tres instrumentos para su diseño y evaluación. Madrid: Narcea
Mena, B. (2006). El diseño curricular de la educación de personas adultas ante el nuevo reto educativo. Un acercamiento didáctico desde una perspectiva tecnológica. Aula, 8, 153-175.
Mora, D. (2002). Educación de adultos y didáctica universitaria en un sistema de educación a distancia. Revista Educación, 26(2), 159-167. Disponible en https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/2912
Moral, C. (2019). Competencias para el diseño y desarrollo de experiencias de aprendizaje en la formación del profesorado. Madrid: Síntesis.
Navarro, R. (Coord.) (2007). Didáctica y Currículum para el desarrollo de competencias. Madrid: Dykinson.
Olmos, P. y Mas, O. (2013). Youth, academic failure and second chance training programmes. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía (REOP), 24(1), 78-93.
Olmos P. y Mas, O. (2019). Building Up a VET System: Formal VET, en F. Marhuenda (Ed), The School-Based Vocational Education and Training System in Spain. Achievements and controversies (pp. 21-40). Singapur: Springer.
Olmos P., Mas, O. y Salvà, F. (2020). Perfiles de desconexión educativa: una aproximación multidimensional en la Formación Profesional Básica. Revista de Educación, 389, 67-91.
Perez Serrano, G. (2002). Elaboración de proyectos sociales: casos prácticos. Madrid: Narcea.
Pimienta, J.H. (2012). Estrategias de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Docencia universitaria basada en competencias. México: Pearson
Sepúlveda, F. y Rajadell, N. (Eds.) (2001). Didáctica General para Psicopedagogos. Madrid: UNED.
Tejada, J. (2001). La planificación del proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje, en F. Sepúlveda y N. Rajadell (Coords.) Didáctica general para psicopedagogos (pp. 233-279). Madrid: UNED.
Tejada, J. y Giménez, V. (Coords.) (2007). Formación de Formadores. Escenario aula. Madrid: Thomson-Paraninfo.
No specific software is used.