Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500241 Archaeology | OB | 2 | 1 |
No prerequisites
The subject of the course is structured in different thematic blocks of what is now called Public Archaeology and that maintain a strong relationship among them: the ideological, political and cultural role that characterizes archaeology in recent history; the formal and informal communication strategies of archaeological knowledge and its relation to the imaginaries about the past, especially about the distant past; the concept of archaeological heritage and its polysemic and, frequently, conflictive character, as well as its normative and administrative presence to the cultural and urbanistic policies. Across these thematic blocks, the different aspects of the archaeological practice and the new professional profiles of archaeology derived from an expanded definition of what currently involves archaeological activity will be discussed.
Accordingly, the training objectives are that students learn to know about these areas, where professional practices and activities related to archaeology are currently developed, to critically analyse their political and cultural uses and to acquire the basic contextual tools to develop her/his research and professional career in the field of archaeology. At the end of the course, students must be able to:
SYLLABUS
1. Management and communication of archaeology: public archeology
2. The image of archaeology: cinema, journalism, literature and the digital world
3. Power and vindication in archaeology
4. Memory policies. Conflictive archaeologies
5. Archaeological heritage, public and citizenship
6. Laws and conflicts around heritage
7. Heritage management models
8. Museums and archaeological museographies
9. Heritage education and didactics of archeology
10. The heritage industry and cultural tourism
Homework:
Classroom pracical activities:
Supervised activities:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom practical activities | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 2, 8, 6, 9 |
Field trips | 10 | 0.4 | 3, 4, 9 |
Lectures | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 4, 9 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervision | 5 | 0.2 | 5, 8, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Homework | 75 | 3 | 1, 5, 8, 6, 9 |
Evaluation modules
A continuous evaluation will be carried out in all the activities developed in the course. The evaluation system is organized in modules, each one will be assigned a specific weight in the final mark:
1. The directed activities represent 50% of the final mark. They will be evaluated through the group work module.
2. Autonomous activities represent 50% of the final mark. They will be evaluated through the module of individual works.
3. Supervised activities will be evaluated through the group work module and group presentations.
Follow-up of attendance at the sessions and participation in field trips by the students will be done by signing assistance sheets.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Evaluation calendar
At the beginning of the course, the students will be informed of the specific contents of the assessment modules and their delivery deadlines.
At the time of completion/delivery of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform (Moodle, SIA) of the procedure and date of revision of the grades.
Requirements to pass the course
• Regurlar participation in the course sessions.
• Participation in the programmed field trips
• Presentation / delivery of the assessment modules within the established deadlines.
• To achieve an average score of the evaluation modules of 5 or more on a scale of 10, provided that a rating of 4 or more has been obtained on a scale of 10 in each of them
• A student will be considered non-evaluable in case: 1.) do not deliver or submit one or more of the evaluation modules within the established deadlines, 2.) do not participate regularly in the sessions, 3.) Do not participate in the programmed field trips
Re-evaluation
The students who meet the following requirements may be submitted for reassessment:
• They must have completed the evaluation modules within the established deadlines, participated regularly in the course sessions and in the programmed field trips
• They must have reached an average score of the assessment modules of 3 or more on a scale of 10
• Only group work modules that have scored a score of less than 5 on a scale of 10. The modules of the classroom presentations are not re-evaluable.
Re-evaluation calendar
The re-evaluation dates are set by the Faculty of Letters. These dates are published on the website of the faculty in the month of July of the previous academic year. It is the responsibility of the students to be aware of the date of the re-evaluation of their course. The final test of the continuous evaluation will be scheduled at least one week before the reassessment date.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group work | 40% | 9 | 0.36 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 6, 7, 9 |
Individual essays | 50% | 10 | 0.4 | 3, 4, 5, 8, 7 |
Public presentations | 10% | 1 | 0.04 | 3, 2, 8, 6, 7, 9 |
There is no specific software for this subject.