Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500246 Philosophy | OT | 3 | 2 |
2500246 Philosophy | OT | 4 | 2 |
English competences with fluid reading comprehension are strongly recommended.
The specific objectives of the subject are the course:
As a philosophy of image, the course revolves around the philosophical problem of non-propositional forms of knowledge, focusing on the problems of aesthetic epistemologies and the criticism of images, investigating to what extent images constitute a possibility of thinking that resists the disciplinary nature with which the treatment of images is usually addressed, especially by the methodology of art history. In this sense, it seeks to promote an understanding of "critique" not merely conceived as an activity consisting of judging ideas, artistic practices or social movements, but rather as one that investigates the conditions of possibility and the modes of creation. within the framework of an expanded conception of what can be considered "knowledge".
1. Thinking on, thinking through, and thinking with images.
2. Crisis of representation
3. The unrepresentable
4. The society of the spectacle
5. The image as a symptom.
6. The creation of through images.
7. Philosophy in other media: Thinking with images
The methodology works on three fronts:
1. Theoretical class/ Lecture The program is configured according to a calendar. Each day the teacher will present a topic that the students must have prepared. The session will be carried out from a digital presentation with concepts and texts and will include the discussion with the students.
2. Tutorial system to be carried out through individual or small group meetings
3. Elaboration of personalized learning itineraries for the autonomous work of the student.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 45 | 1.8 | 3, 2, 13, 12, 6, 17, 18, 20, 21 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials and personalized learning development | 26 | 1.04 | 4, 19, 5, 14, 6, 24, 22 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Home work | 71.5 | 2.86 | 9, 19, 5, 16, 24, 22, 23 |
There will be a continuous assessment which consists of the following three parts:
TYPE OF ASSESSMENT
1. Realization of two partial exams
Partial 1
Partial 2
2. Writing of a short essay of 2000 words
General information
- At the beginning of the course, the format to be followed for the writing of the philosophical essay and an expanded list of recommended readings will be provided.
- In the calendar of activities that will be available at the beginning of the course, the dates of sitting of the written exams and the submission deadline for the remaining exercises are indicated. For a correct continuous evaluation, submissions outside the set deadlines will not be accepted. For more information, see the re-assessment criteria.
- Any change in the dates of evaluation or content will be notified with sufficient time in advance in class.
- In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
- In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity,
regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
NON-EVALUABLE STUDENTS
Students who do not sit at least one of the two partial exams will not be evaluated at the end of the course, unless they contact the personresponsible for the course sufficiently in advance, in order to consider an alternative form of evaluation. agreed between the teacher and the student.
Reassessment criteria
To have a final grade, it is necessary for the student to be evaluated of both the partial exams and the essay submission.
Reassessment date: to be determined.
WARNING - STUDENTS WHO WISH TO SIT THE REASSESSMENT EXAM MUST GET IN TOUCH BY EMAIL WITH THE TEACHER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COURSE AT LEAST TWO WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE DATE ESTABLISHED. PLEASE, DO NOT FORGET TO SEND ME AN EMAIL to my institutional email: gerard.vilar@uab.cat.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 Proofs | 25 % each of the three | 7.5 | 0.3 | 2, 7, 8, 1, 10, 11, 14, 25, 17, 15, 16 |
Attendance and participation in lectures | 25 % | 0 | 0 | 3, 2, 4, 7, 1, 9, 10, 11, 19, 13, 5, 14, 12, 6, 25, 17, 15, 18, 20, 24, 21, 22, 23 |
Basic compulsory readings
(Students must check the teacher's website at the beginning of the course to see if there are any changes regarding the readings and contents of the course)
Module 1:
Hans Belting, «Image, Medium, Body », Critical Inquiry 31 (2005): 302-319. full text.
W.T.J. Mitchell, « What is an image ». full text.
Horst Bredekamp, Teoría del acto icónico, Madrid, Akal, 2017, pp. 15-39.
Module 2:
George Steiner, « La crisis del lenguaje », en Presencias Reales, Destino, 1989, pp. 111-145.
Walter Benjamin, “La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica” en Obras, I.2, Madrid, Abada Editores, 2008.
Michel Foucault, Esto no es una pipa. Ensayo sobre Magritte, Barcelona, Anagrama, 1981, pp.47-51.
Module3:
Jacques Rancière, « Si existe lo irrepresentable ». Todo.
Module 4:
Guy Debord, La sociedad del espectáculo. [selected fragments] Ensayos, Madrid: Siruela, 2007.
Jacques Rancière, “Crítica de la crítica del espectáculo”, en: VV.AA, Pensar desde la izquierda, Madrid, Errata Naturae, 2012. Full text.
Module 5:
Sigmund Freud, “Un recuerdo infantil de Leonardo da Vinci”, Obras Completas. fulltext.
Jacques Rancière, “La imagen intolerable”, en El espectador emancipado, pp. 87-106.
Module 6:
Nelson Goodman, "Ways of worldmaking", chap 1.
Gilles Deleuze, « Qué es un acto de creación ». full text.
Module 7:
Jacques Rancière, “Imágenes pensativas” en: El espectador emancipado, Castellón, Ellago, 2010, pp. 107-129.
Further reading
Alloa, Emmanuel, La imagen diáfana. Fenomenología de los medios Visuales, Metales pesados, 2021.
Azoulay, Ariella, “What is a Photograph?”, Philosophy of Photography, 1 (2010), pp. 9-13.
Barthes, Roland, La cámara lúcida, Buenos Aires, Editorial Paidós, 2005.
Bellour, Raymond, Entre imágenes: foto, cine, video, Buenos Aires, Colihue, 2009.
Benjamin, Walter, Sobre la fotografía, Madrid, Pre-textos, 2004.
Brea, José Luis, Estudios visuales. La epistemología de la visualidad en la era de la globalización, Madrid, Akal, 2005.
Brea, José Luis, Las tres Eras de la imagen. Imagen-Materia, Filme, E-Imagen, Madrid, Ediciones Akal, 2010.
Debray, Regis, Vida y muerte de la imagen. Historia de la mirada en Occidente, Barcelona, Editorial Paidós, 1994.
Denisova, Anastasia, Internet Memes and Society, Routledge, 2019.
Didi-Huberman, Georges, La imagen superviviente. Historia del arte y tiempo de los fantasmas según Aby Warburg, Madrid, Abada Editores, 2009.
Elkins, James, “Un seminario sobre teoría de la imagen”, Revista Estudios Visuales,7, pp.132-173, 2010.
Foucault, Michel, Las palabras y las cosas. Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas, Madrid, Siglo XXI, 2010.
García, Ana María (Ed.) Filosofía de la imagen. Salamanca, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2011.
Guasch, Ana María, “Los estudios visuales. Un estado de la cuestión”, Revista Estudios Visuales, 1, pp. 8-16, 2003.
Heidegger, Martin, La época de la imagen del mundo, Santiago, Ediciones de los Anales de la Universidad de Chile, 1958.
Melot, Michel, Breve historia de la imagen, Madrid, Ediciones Siruela, 2010.
Mitchell, W. J. T. What do pictures want?: the lives and loves of images, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Nancy, Jean-Luc “The image-the distinct” en The Ground of the image, New York, Fordham University Press, 2005.
The main reading materials for the course and a complete bibliography are available on the teacher's website: greta.cat/grau
No program is used in this course.